Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Omaha High (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=405399)

RoundTower 05-17-2007 12:09 PM

3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
Interesting spot here, on iPoker. I don't know the villains very well but they both seem fairly straightforward. I'm pretty sure the raiser can raise with the bare nuts here, but he might also decide to just call. We are all approx 1150 deep.

I raise 2 off the button A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] to $20. CO calls, button calls, SB calls.

Flop K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. SB leads pot $86. I call. CO folds. Button raises pot to $430 leaving 700 behind. SB folds.

wazz 05-17-2007 12:21 PM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
Interesting spot, I can see arguments for all 3 actions. In the sense that villain 'must have' the nut straight, it's an easy fold, but once he has some set/2 pair + combo draw hands it's a semi-obvious all-in, though he has nut straight here much more often than set + combo draw. If he's got the naked straight with no redraws and he figures to have you both beat now, he would be raising the bare nuts to charge whatever draw you both had. In that sense, I like stop-and-going any heart / checking any board pair, though I'm not sure you have the stack depth to push him off a non-nut flush.

In any case, you always have plenty of outs here, so if there's enough doubt in your mind, I like shoving.

chucky 05-17-2007 01:24 PM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
The only way you can call is if you can bluff at hearts on turn. Otherwise, calling to hit 7 nut and 3 chop out is not a good strat. Calling this is also bad because you are OOP, so if a heart arrives on turn you will have to bet hard at flush board and hope villian doesnt have flush as well.

mustmuck 05-17-2007 01:36 PM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
[ QUOTE ]
In that sense, I like stop-and-going any heart

[/ QUOTE ]

See, I rarely try this one with a hand like hero's. My problem with it is that I'm not calling the flop with a bare FD, and if have have a set/FD or straight/FD then I'm shoving the flop. So on the turn if I shove a heart my hand makes no sense. No?

wazz 05-17-2007 02:12 PM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
In that sense, I like stop-and-going any heart

[/ QUOTE ]

See, I rarely try this one with a hand like hero's. My problem with it is that I'm not calling the flop with a bare FD, and if have have a set/FD or straight/FD then I'm shoving the flop. So on the turn if I shove a heart my hand makes no sense. No?

[/ QUOTE ]

One must vary ones' play to the point that your opponents can plausibly believe you would bet-call with a hand that includes the nut flush draw. For example, you might do so with nut flush draw + gutshot without even a pair.

Silent A 05-17-2007 02:31 PM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
Simulation vs co-ordinated JTxx ...

Omaha Hi Simulation
600,000 trials (Randomized)
board: khqd9h
Hand Pot equity Wins Ties
ahkskdjs 41.85% 240,146 21,860
jtMM,jtBB,JTBM 58.15% 337,994 21,860

There is $688 in the pot, it will cost you $344 to call, and he has $700 behind. If you push, it will cost you $1044 and the pot will be $2432. Therefore you need 1044/2422 = 0.43 equity to push. You only have this against a totally random JTxx (and only barely).

If you call and miss the flop, you will barely have pot odds to call (700/2432 = 0.29, and you'll have, on average, 0.29 equity). If you hope to scare him off if a heart hits, then there's probably a decent chance that he'll fold if a pair hits.

Let's say that Villain will fold any heart or pair turn card a fraction of the time, "f".

There are 16 such scare cards out of 45 possible turns. If he folds all these cards your EV for this line will be ...

EV = (16/45)*(688) + (29/45)*(0.29*2432 - 1044) = +$26

If he calls these scare cards then ...

EV = (7/45)*(1388) + (38/45)*(0.29*2432 - 1044) = -$70

So for this line to show a profit ...

26f > 70(1-f)
f > 70/96
f > 0.73

Note the EV of simply pushing the flop against co-ordinated JTxx is ...

EV = (0.42)(1388) - (0.58)(1044) = -$22.50

So the call and push a scare card line peforms better than a flop push if ...

26f - 70(1-f) > -22.5
f > 0.5

So Wazz's line is better than a flop push if you think villain folds more than 50% of time when a scare card hits, and it's outright +EV if he folds more than about 75% of the time.

These numbers seem high for what would be a 0.7 pot bet, especially when you consider that villain is probably more likely to fold on a paired turn than a flush turn (and you want the opposite).

Finally, what also concerns me is SB's hand. What pots the flop and then folds to a call and a raise? Unless he was betting his blockers with JJxx, there's a decent chance that he was holding at least 2 of your outs.

CrushinFelt 05-18-2007 12:14 AM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
Your last part SA about the problem about at least 2 of your outs being gone is my main problem with continuing in this hand. Spots like these just don't tend to work out well. As SA said you NEED a heart turn + a fold too much of the time to make this profitable because you're never going to get action on a board-pairing turn.

SA what would it take to modify your calculations if villain is ALWAYS folding board-pairing turn and thus the only question is whether or not he folds a heart?

I think what will happen is that we need him to fold a heart nearly all the time.

Silent A 05-18-2007 02:43 AM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
[ QUOTE ]
SA what would it take to modify your calculations if villain is ALWAYS folding board-pairing turn and thus the only question is whether or not he folds a heart?

I think what will happen is that we need him to fold a heart nearly all the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just change the 2nd EV calc to (approx) ...

EV = (7/45)*(688) + (38/45)*(0.29*2432 - 1044) = -$179

and ...

26f > 179(1-f)
f > 179/205
f > 0.87

wazz 05-18-2007 06:19 AM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
Assuming villain has neither he is more likely to fold to a heart than a board pair.

pete fabrizio 05-18-2007 07:01 AM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
I don't have much to add to the analysis, but I call and lead any non-board-pairing turn.

JasonP530 05-18-2007 07:33 AM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
Good analysis silent. You didn't take into account those times when villian has 2 pair plus gutter or something which you are way ahead of. This is somewhat balanced by the times he has more than the bare nuts(pair also), but I am not sure they even out...

Silent A 05-18-2007 02:18 PM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
[ QUOTE ]
Good analysis silent. You didn't take into account those times when villian has 2 pair plus gutter or something which you are way ahead of. This is somewhat balanced by the times he has more than the bare nuts(pair also), but I am not sure they even out...

[/ QUOTE ]

I only meant to analyze what happens against a co-ordinated JTxx, which, given the action, is by far the most likely hand villain has.

The only other hand I can think of that would pot here is 2nd/3rd set and a flush draw, probably with a gutshot (e.g. A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]). You'll see less of these than JTxx (because 3/4 hand combinations are inherently less common than 2 card combinations), but since you have much better equity against these types of hands you don't have to see that many to justify a call/push here.

Out of curiosity, for those who are more familiar with this level, am I giving a random villain far too much credit here for a very strong hand? The lowest I can think of going to is 2 pair + FD + (probable) gutshot.

pete fabrizio 05-18-2007 03:10 PM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
[ QUOTE ]
Out of curiosity, for those who are more familiar with this level, am I giving a random villain far too much credit here for a very strong hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you're giving him too much credit, but not "far" too much.

JasonP530 05-18-2007 06:46 PM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
your range is about right. two pair +fd is about the worst i would expect to see.

RoundTower 05-20-2007 11:16 PM

Re: 3 6 top set and gutshot, looks like i have too many outs to fold
 
If anything you aren't giving enough credit, I expected to see the nuts most of the time here, a good amount of that time he has a flush draw too.

I think there are some excellent points in this thread. If we call here and try to push him off a heart and get paid on a board pair, we need to be very optimistic that we can get him to commit himself on one and not the other. Also there is a decent chance he has hearts of some sort, or an ace for the same redraw we have. Also you have to put the first guy on a hand of some sort, leading this board into 3 players means he probably has pairs or hearts, both of those are bad for us.

Results: I folded and didn't beat myself up over it, but I didn't like the idea of folding a hand this good for one more bet.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.