texdolly on FTP
 

Can anyone confirm this is Doyle?

He's sitting with durrr and Gus playing 2/4 PLO and durrr just challenged him to more tables. texdolly says something like ok, razz, stud, what? durrr goes 'lol minbetaments are for fish, come play PLO/NL. Doyle doesn't respond.

The end.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

it's Doyle. Someone asked him the other day and he confirmed

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

Durr is awesome

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

Doyle doesn't have the cojones to face durr.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
it's Doyle. Someone asked him the other day and he confirmed

[/ QUOTE ]

Well that's conclusive.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
Doyle doesn't have the cojones to face durr.

[/ QUOTE ]

or the bankroll

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
it's Doyle. Someone asked him the other day and he confirmed

[/ QUOTE ]

Well that's conclusive.

[/ QUOTE ]

Texdolly was his s/n for Doyle's Room. Since Doyles Room transferred its customer base to full tilt, and shortly after there's a player sitting in the 1k/2k HORSE games by that name, its fairly certain that its him.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

Give the man a break. He's over 70 years old; of course he might hesitate some to play 20-year-old Tom Dwan on the internet. Put them against each other at a live table, and we'll see how they'll do.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
Give the man a break. He's over 70 years old; of course he might hesitate some to play 20-year-old Tom Dwan on the internet. Put them against each other at a live table, and we'll see how they'll do.

[/ QUOTE ]

Live tells are so overrated. Durrr would eat him alive when he turns 21. Those name pros are such fish on HSP. It's amazing they have the shark like reputations they do. Now granted, Doyle has actually looked the best out of the name pros on HSP but still..

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Give the man a break. He's over 70 years old; of course he might hesitate some to play 20-year-old Tom Dwan on the internet. Put them against each other at a live table, and we'll see how they'll do.

[/ QUOTE ]

Live tells are so overrated. Durrr would eat him alive when he turns 21. Those name pros are such fish on HSP. It's amazing they have the shark like reputations they do. Now granted, Doyle has actually looked the best out of the name pros on HSP but still..

[/ QUOTE ]

While I agree that there are some plays on HSP that *look* donkish, you'd have to know the history of all the players with respect to eachother to make that statement.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

Was texdolly highlighted in Red?

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
Give the man a break. He's over 70 years old; of course he might hesitate some to play 20-year-old Tom Dwan on the internet. Put them against each other at a live table, and we'll see how they'll do.

[/ QUOTE ]

Blah, blah, internet isn't real poker blah blah blah.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
Was texdolly highlighted in Red?

[/ QUOTE ]

Why were people in the rail asking this? Of course he's not red, he has no relationship with FTP. Just because you're a known pro does not mean you show up in red.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

texdolly has to be Doyle. Who else would pick that sn?

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
Durrr would eat him alive when he turns 21.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm...funny you say this without mentioning what game they are going to play. I can think of a few that I think Doyle would be favored in and I'm a Durr fan [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
texdolly has to be Doyle. Who else would pick that sn?

[/ QUOTE ]
someone impersonating doyle.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
texdolly has to be Doyle. Who else would pick that sn?

[/ QUOTE ]

someone who likes threads started on message boards on whether or not they are a name pro.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
texdolly has to be Doyle. Who else would pick that sn?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hi I'm with your bank, can you please PM me your bank account, name and adress, as well as any passwords for online accounts? thanks.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

Push fold leveled you.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Give the man a break. He's over 70 years old; of course he might hesitate some to play 20-year-old Tom Dwan on the internet. Put them against each other at a live table, and we'll see how they'll do.

[/ QUOTE ]

Live tells are so overrated. Durrr would eat him alive when he turns 21. Those name pros are such fish on HSP. It's amazing they have the shark like reputations they do. Now granted, Doyle has actually looked the best out of the name pros on HSP but still..

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not as much Doyle being at an advantage at a live table as Doyle being at a disadvantage on the net. After all, being over 70 years old, it's conceivable he isn't as comfortable with computerized poker at a high tempo.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Give the man a break. He's over 70 years old; of course he might hesitate some to play 20-year-old Tom Dwan on the internet. Put them against each other at a live table, and we'll see how they'll do.

[/ QUOTE ]

Blah, blah, internet isn't real poker blah blah blah.

[/ QUOTE ]

That wasn't my point; see above.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Durrr would eat him alive when he turns 21.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm...funny you say this without mentioning what game they are going to play. I can think of a few that I think Doyle would be favored in and I'm a Durr fan [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Durrr has what...5 years of Poker experience? Doyle has about 50 years under his belt. He would crush Durrr in the long run.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

Too bad Durrr has a longer run to look forward to.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Durrr would eat him alive when he turns 21.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm...funny you say this without mentioning what game they are going to play. I can think of a few that I think Doyle would be favored in and I'm a Durr fan [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Durrr has what...5 years of Poker experience? Doyle has about 50 years under his belt. He would crush Durrr in the long run.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd say durrr has played more hands than doyle has in NLholdem.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
Too bad Durrr has a longer run to look forward to.

[/ QUOTE ]

If Durrr hasn't bust by Doyl's age I'll be amazed. Strike that..if Durr doesn't go bust by the time he's 25 I'll be amazed.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]

Durrr has what...5 years of Poker experience? Doyle has about 50 years under his belt. He would crush Durrr in the long run.

[/ QUOTE ]

According to an interview with Durrr he started in 2004 .. which means he has around 3 years experience. Which makes me sick to my stomach.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Durrr would eat him alive when he turns 21.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm...funny you say this without mentioning what game they are going to play. I can think of a few that I think Doyle would be favored in and I'm a Durr fan [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Durrr has what...5 years of Poker experience? Doyle has about 50 years under his belt. He would crush Durrr in the long run.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd say durrr has played more hands than doyle has in NLholdem.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am sure someone who has played for 3 years has played more hands(NLHoldem) then Doyle in 50 years. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] You have to be kidding me.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]

because you're a known pro does not mean you show up in red.

[/ QUOTE ]

The quote above is pretty obvious.

I was wondering if his SN was in Red to see if he had become associated with FT. With his site closing to US players and moving the US player base to FT it wouldn't be a stretch for Doyle to join FT. They have a few big name players on their team.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Durrr would eat him alive when he turns 21.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm...funny you say this without mentioning what game they are going to play. I can think of a few that I think Doyle would be favored in and I'm a Durr fan [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Durrr has what...5 years of Poker experience? Doyle has about 50 years under his belt. He would crush Durrr in the long run.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd say durrr has played more hands than doyle has in NLholdem.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am sure someone who has played for 3 years has played more hands(NLHoldem) then Doyle in 50 years. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] You have to be kidding me.

[/ QUOTE ]

say it's close.

doyle plays a lot of other games apart from NL.

the internet is pretty fast also.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Durrr would eat him alive when he turns 21.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm...funny you say this without mentioning what game they are going to play. I can think of a few that I think Doyle would be favored in and I'm a Durr fan [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Durrr has what...5 years of Poker experience? Doyle has about 50 years under his belt. He would crush Durrr in the long run.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd say durrr has played more hands than doyle has in NLholdem.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am sure someone who has played for 3 years has played more hands(NLHoldem) then Doyle in 50 years. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] You have to be kidding me.

[/ QUOTE ]

say it's close.

doyle plays a lot of other games apart from NL.

the internet is pretty fast also.

[/ QUOTE ]

There is absolutely no way it is close. Do you understand there is about a 45 YEAR difference. Even if online would go at 200 hands per hour, he would not catch up.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]

There is absolutely no way it is close. Do you understand there is about a 45 YEAR difference. Even if online would go at 200 hands per hour, he would not catch up.

[/ QUOTE ]

Durrrr's avarage is surely way higer than 200 hands/hour. While Doyle's rate has been what, like 30 hands/hour for 50 years?

Haven't done the math, but I don't think Doyle is a big favourite when it comes to the number of hands played.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Durrr would eat him alive when he turns 21.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm...funny you say this without mentioning what game they are going to play. I can think of a few that I think Doyle would be favored in and I'm a Durr fan [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Durrr has what...5 years of Poker experience? Doyle has about 50 years under his belt. He would crush Durrr in the long run.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd say durrr has played more hands than doyle has in NLholdem.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am sure someone who has played for 3 years has played more hands(NLHoldem) then Doyle in 50 years. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] You have to be kidding me.

[/ QUOTE ]

say it's close.

doyle plays a lot of other games apart from NL.

the internet is pretty fast also.

[/ QUOTE ]

There is absolutely no way it is close. Do you understand there is about a 45 YEAR difference. Even if online would go at 200 hands per hour, he would not catch up.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's true it's not close the online player has played alot more hands... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Durrr would eat him alive when he turns 21.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm...funny you say this without mentioning what game they are going to play. I can think of a few that I think Doyle would be favored in and I'm a Durr fan [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Durrr has what...5 years of Poker experience? Doyle has about 50 years under his belt. He would crush Durrr in the long run.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd say durrr has played more hands than doyle has in NLholdem.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am sure someone who has played for 3 years has played more hands(NLHoldem) then Doyle in 50 years. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] You have to be kidding me.

[/ QUOTE ]

say it's close.

doyle plays a lot of other games apart from NL.

the internet is pretty fast also.

[/ QUOTE ]

There is absolutely no way it is close. Do you understand there is about a 45 YEAR difference. Even if online would go at 200 hands per hour, he would not catch up.

[/ QUOTE ]

Try 600, 700+ / hr, even more if he's really playing a lot of tables or playing really shorthanded. Doyle's getting 30 hands / hr. So ummm 1 hr of durrrr = 20 hrs of Doyle... so 3 years of durrr = 60 years of Doyle just assuming that all Doyle does is play NL holdem, which I think he plays a lot less of because he probably plays mostly mixed games.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

I'm pretty sure he averages more than 200 hands/hr with multitabling.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Durrr would eat him alive when he turns 21.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm...funny you say this without mentioning what game they are going to play. I can think of a few that I think Doyle would be favored in and I'm a Durr fan [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Durrr has what...5 years of Poker experience? Doyle has about 50 years under his belt. He would crush Durrr in the long run.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd say durrr has played more hands than doyle has in NLholdem.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am sure someone who has played for 3 years has played more hands(NLHoldem) then Doyle in 50 years. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] You have to be kidding me.

[/ QUOTE ]

say it's close.

doyle plays a lot of other games apart from NL.

the internet is pretty fast also.

[/ QUOTE ]

There is absolutely no way it is close. Do you understand there is about a 45 YEAR difference. Even if online would go at 200 hands per hour, he would not catch up.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know if you're levelling or if you're just plain ol' stupid. Let's assume that since Durrr started playing internet-poker, he's played on average 200 days/year of NL Hold'em where he averaged 6 hours a day while 4-tabling (which is perhaps an overly conservative assumption). 6 hours * 4 tables * 75 hands/hour (extremely conservation assupmtion) * 200 days * 3 years = 1,080,000 hands of NL Hold'em.

Now with Doyle, let's just assume he's been playing NL Hold'em for 40 years on average 150 days a year (which I think is highly ambitious because I think there were years in which he probably rarely touched the game). Let's assume on average 6 hours a day, playing 1 table of course and at around 40 hands/hour. 40 years * 150 days * 6 hours * 1 table * 40 hands/hour = 1,440,000.

So what I've done is take guestimates and make assumptions giving you the absolute benefit of the doubt, based on little research and I've already proven that your "it's not even close" statement displays your true level of ignorance.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]




I don't know if you're levelling or if you're just plain ol' stupid. Let's assume that since Durrr started playing internet-poker, he's played on average 200 days/year of NL Hold'em where he averaged 6 hours a day while 4-tabling (which is perhaps an overly conservative assumption). 6 hours * 10 tables * 75 hands/hour (extremely conservation assupmtion) * 200 days * 3 years = 2,700,000 hands of NL Hold'em.

Now with Doyle, let's just assume he's been playing NL Hold'em for 40 years on average 150 days a year (which I think is highly ambitious because I think there were years in which he probably rarely touched the game). Let's assume on average 6 hours a day, playing 1 table of course and at around 30 hands/hour. 40 years * 150 days * 6 hours * 1 table * 40 hands/hour = 1,080,000.

So what I've done is take guestimates and make assumptions giving you the absolute benefit of the doubt, based on little research and I've already proven that your "it's not even close" statement displays your true level of ignorance.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

KurtSF I was just making overly conservative assumptions to illustrate how retarded the "its not even close" statement was. I believe that Durrr has most likely played more hands than Doyle.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

if it is true that durr has played more hands than doyle, has durr also remembered more hands than doyle? when you multitable you don't have enough time to think about hands/actions as much as you do in live play. A live hand is worth more than an online hand.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

I'll take a bet with anyone that Durr has played more hands of NLH than Doyle.

Re: texdolly on FTP
 

[ QUOTE ]
if it is true that durr has played more hands than doyle, has durr also remembered more hands than doyle? when you multitable you don't have enough time to think about hands/actions as much as you do in live play. A live hand is worth more than an online hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

95%+ hands aren't interesting

I doubt doyle remembers all that many hands from 10yrs ago