Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=54)
-   -   More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=192936)

Entity 08-21-2006 10:02 PM

More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
MP is loose, doesn't raise much preflop but tends to be more aggressive after the flop than his preflop play would suggest. While he raises about 10% of his hands preflop he makes up for it postflop; I've seen him raise the turn with questionable draws, play gutshots and middle pair aggressively, etc. He tends to show down any pair too often.

Button is loose and calls down with very very very marginal holdings often.

Party Poker 10/20 Hold'em (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Button calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero checks.

Flop: (3.50 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, MP checks, Button checks.

Turn: (1.75 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP calls, Button calls.

River: (4.75 BB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises</font>, Button folds, Hero calls.

Final Pot: 8.75 BB

helpmeout 08-21-2006 10:07 PM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
when you get 2 calls on the turn I'm likely check/folding that river

The Bryce 08-22-2006 12:21 AM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
There's like, no value in betting the turn. Indoooose.

Victor 08-22-2006 12:39 AM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
wow i really hate ur river bet. what do you beat here? i cant imagine ace high makes up enough of his range.

Entity 08-22-2006 12:42 AM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
[ QUOTE ]
wow i really hate ur river bet. what do you beat here? i cant imagine ace high makes up enough of his range.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's 3-ways and Button (my main target with the valuebet since I think the other will have a hand weaker than Jx very often given his general aggression) will call with any pocket pair, any 4, and occasionally Ace high. I've seen him calldown with KQ-high on monotone boards when he held none of the specific suit. He's a pretty big payoff station. HU I think I can check to induce but I felt at the time that with the station protecting the pot I put myself into an icky position when MP bets and Button calls, because MP will still make retarded bluffs and station will still call with a wide range, but I'm not sure that my hand good nearly as often when it goes check-bet-call (and I should fold, as helpmeout suggested) than when I do the betting msyelf. Of course, then I get myself in this spot, and...

What's the weakest hand everyone who suggests checking the river would bet here, 3-ways, against this lineup?

Rob

cartman 08-22-2006 07:33 AM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
[ QUOTE ]
I felt at the time that with the station protecting the pot I put myself into an icky position when MP bets and Button calls, because MP will still make retarded bluffs and station will still call with a wide range, but I'm not sure that my hand good nearly as often when it goes check-bet-call

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you may be mixing apples and oranges here. Given that neither of them fold, your hand will be good more often if it you check and it goes bet-call and if you bet and it goes call-call. The reason is that the first scenario includes bluffs by MP. You may feel better about betting, but that is just because at the time that you bet you won't yet know whether MP will call.

I don't hate your bet because I think it is likely enough that MP would have spoken up by now if he had a hand better than yours. But if he is likely to bluff if you check, then in my opinion you should give him the chance and not feel any worse about calling them both than you would have about betting.

I think the important thing to realize is that neither of them is folding a better hand than yours anyway so, if you don't have the winner when you overcall the river, you wouldn't have had the winner if you bet either.

Are you confused yet? I know I am [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Cartman

cartman 08-22-2006 07:39 AM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
[ QUOTE ]

What's the weakest hand everyone who suggests checking the river would bet here, 3-ways, against this lineup?


[/ QUOTE ]

For me this depends almost entirely on how likely it is MP would have bet or raised sooner with a J or K and how likely it is he will bluff if I check. Just from your description I would think around JT caliber but that is rank speculation.

MATT111 08-22-2006 08:00 AM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
On the turn you have enough reason to think your hand is best and you will get calls from worse hands a lot. I still like c/calling better as a bet will likely come from MP and BT will call very often. Also you would really hate getting raised.
As played I like the river bet as BT may have picked up a worse pair on the turn or river and MP may call with a small pp as well. I guess you really have to fold to the river raise unless MP is a complete retard. Your read suggest he would have popped somethging like an OESD on the turn. (My guess would be he rivered a set).

john kane 08-22-2006 03:10 PM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
i bet turn and check-call river

jay b. 08-22-2006 03:15 PM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
[ QUOTE ]
There's like, no value in betting the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

How come?

veganmav 08-22-2006 03:17 PM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
I read what you said and I still have no idea why you would wnat to bet this river.

Nate tha\\\' Great 08-22-2006 03:57 PM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
I think calling the river raise is probably a bigger mistake than betting the river. I always call down in this kind of spot, hoping to catch some resteal, and always wind up being shown a better hand.

MATT111 08-22-2006 04:26 PM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
[ QUOTE ]
I read what you said and I still have no idea why you would wnat to bet this river.

[/ QUOTE ]


BT is a calling station. So he calls with a 3 or 4 but doesnt bet it.

Entity 08-23-2006 02:11 PM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think calling the river raise is probably a bigger mistake than betting the river. I always call down in this kind of spot, hoping to catch some resteal, and always wind up being shown a better hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

What's your line on the river, Nate? Bet-fold, check-fold, check-call?

This was one situation where, for whatever reason, I thought he'd have a monster here sometimes (often KK or AA) or a bluff. Nothing really in-between. Getting 7.75:1 I thought it was close enough to call given that I didn't trust him, and was shown T9o for the missed OESD, but I still think the river play is a pretty close decision overall.

Rob

Nate tha\\\' Great 08-23-2006 02:22 PM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
I'd probably bet-fold.

re: the call -- I get what you're saying, but my experience is that opponents just don't bother to do a lot of re-stealing in small, momentumless pots. They probably should, but they don't.

Trix 08-23-2006 06:46 PM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
I bet the flop, river and usually the turn too, but think checking is interesting and might be better.

Surf 08-23-2006 07:10 PM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
[ QUOTE ]
I bet the flop, river and usually the turn too, but think checking is interesting and might be better.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think betting the flop is a mistake.

Surf

Trix 08-23-2006 07:15 PM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
I dont have to take it down right there more than 20% or so, you dont think that will happen ?

Edit: err, I know that this alone doesnīt make it better than checking as you arenīt losing the hands just because you check, but Iīm going to give up alot if someone bets and it will happen pretty often too, so I think itīs better to lead myself.

Surf 08-23-2006 07:39 PM

Re: More controversy -- river bet-call with 3PBK
 
[ QUOTE ]
I dont have to take it down right there more than 20% or so, you dont think that will happen ?

Edit: err, I know that this alone doesnīt make it better than checking as you arenīt losing the hands just because you check, but Iīm going to give up alot if someone bets and it will happen pretty often too, so I think itīs better to lead myself.

[/ QUOTE ]

if you think it's a worthwhile bet b/c you take it down 20% of the time that's fine, but we've turned our pair of 8s into a bluff, which doesn't seem terribly practical since nearly every better hand will call and very few worse ones will.

Surf


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.