My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

Hey all,

I started playing SNGs two/three weeks ago (switching over from NL cash) and I've been quite successful. I started with the 33s, then moved up to the 55s and now I'm 8 tabling the 100s, starting another everytime I finish one. What do you guys think? Do you guys think I'm just having some beginners luck or might I be able to sustain these rates (40% ROI) or at least sustain a 30% ROI at the 100s? I will be very happy with that earning rate.

http://www.geocities.com/dewar232/results.JPG

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

God why does this happen to all the people who dont deserve it and never to the people who really need it.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

You need to see the biggest luckbox thread.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
You need to see the biggest luckbox thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

does anyone know how to tie a noose knot?

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
does anyone know how to tie a noose knot?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, I've been trying to tie mine for months but it's never tight enough, [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img].

Yugoslav

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

People are saying you are running very good.

However, you seem to be doing something right and I hope you stick around and contribute.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

This is obviously a hot streak but I think a lot of it has to do with switching over from NL cash. I have had abnormally good results after my stint playing 6max NL 200 (some ring). The early play is so bad that a person with good knowledge of the nuances of deep stack NL play can really tear these things up.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

Can you teach me how to win coinflips? My skill seems to lack in this area of SNGs

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

these are party regulars I presume ?

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

To put things in perspective, you as a new player might be able to sustain 5-7% ROI at the 100s.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

They are from a very successful 10/20 NL cash game player (lolotrickedu). Check out BBV if you really want to read more about it.

At any rate, either these SNG #'s are doctored or this is the most savage heater ever. I call BS on them to be honest with you.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

WTF?
#2994811 - 07/28/05 04:02 PM

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

There are two possibilities:

1,You are the greatest player in the history of the STTF

2,You are running incredibly hot

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
People are saying you are running very good.

However, you seem to be doing something right and I hope you stick around and contribute.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
People are saying you are running very good.

However, you seem to be doing something right and I hope you stick around and contribute.

[/ QUOTE ]

he made 50k a month in cash game: linky

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
People are saying you are running very good.

However, you seem to be doing something right and I hope you stick around and contribute.

[/ QUOTE ]

he makes 200k a month in cash game: linky


[/ QUOTE ]
FYP
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...rue#Post5701495

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

eHustler/lolo:

You are running hot. You are possibly also far better than the "I pulled the fact that the 109s can't be beat for more than 10% out of my ass and will accuse anybody who disputes that of lying" can conceive. That's no less than 85% of this forum from what I can tell. I hope you keep posting but you will surely be chastised by most posters here.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

Bill, thats 50k so far in May... 10k per day.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
eHustler/lolo:

You are running hot. You are possibly also far better than the "I pulled the fact that the 109s can't be beat for more than 10% out of my ass and will accuse anybody who disputes that of lying" can conceive. That's no less than 85% of this forum from what I can tell. I hope you keep posting but you will surely be chastised by most posters here.

[/ QUOTE ]
THIS WAS POSTED A YEAR AGO HE DOESN'T CARE ANYMORE NOW THAT HE MAKES 200K/MONTH

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

The best part of this screenshot was the 3 limit tournaments. Can't image how he got registered for them...

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

Also, I think the regulars are beatable by ~30% through the 109s at prime hours by an elite player.

*Ducks*

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

Sorry for the hijack, but I see this so often. What does FYP mean? For Your Pleasure?

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Sorry for the hijack, but I see this so often. What does FYP mean? For Your Pleasure?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope. [censored] You Pussy. J/K - its "fixed your post"

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

Ah, thank you very much. Anyway, OP is on the biggest heater since Moneymaker.

WTF - sorry for bumping this. It was on the third page, can't logically see how this happened. Apologies.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

I started playing STTs shortly before the party change, so I don't really remember the old structure..but were numbers like this even possible back then...

I'm very confused and most of all very disheartened from seeing this...

damn whoever bumped this thing...I was much happier an hour ago [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Bill, thats 50k so far in May... 10k per day.

[/ QUOTE ]

ok ok, not matter whether it is true or not, I'll just choose to take it as a lie.[img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

What's with the thread necromancy?

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

I personally think this person is just faking / stealing pokertracker stats. But it could be loloTRICKEDu, in theory...

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

I thought I had already read this. this thread is a year old people. We have a phantom bumper on our hands!

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
People are saying you are running very good.

However, you seem to be doing something right and I hope you stick around and contribute.

[/ QUOTE ]

he makes 200k a month in cash game: linky


[/ QUOTE ]
FYP
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...rue#Post5701495

[/ QUOTE ]

damn. seems real.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

Ok after reading that thread in BBV it looks like you are possibility#1.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

In mid '05 + top 10 TAG on the site + running hot = totally believable

In mid '06...not so much

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

In only 77 $109s, I would certainly think this is possible. Especially at the regulars.

Also, his numbers at the $33s arent THAT ridiculous either for regulars.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
In mid '05 + top 10 TAG on the site + running hot = totally believable

In mid '06...not so much

[/ QUOTE ]

You really think SnGs have gotten all that much tougher in the last year? I dunno. I mean...this guy is beating 10/20NL6-max for 6bb/100 10-tabling over 300k hands...

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

Yeah, only a chunk of the regulars used ICM properly back then plus the 33's were 800 chippers w. no 150 level etc etc...they are tougher now and much more robot/pushbot friendly on top of it (more time spent at 7-10 BB).

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

when i started to 8 table the 100s i ran that good for almost twice as long (+10k with about 60% roi). Its definatly possible, but not sustainable. I went undefeated when i accidently signed up for limit sngs 5/0/0/0 [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

LOL this is the sweetest bumped thread EVER on 2p2 whoever did it.


btw this guy is 100% legit. in case you didn't know.

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
LOL this is the sweetest bumped thread EVER on 2p2 whoever did it.


btw this guy is 100% legit. in case you didn't know.

[/ QUOTE ]

it was dan87 asking how to win coinflips

Re: My first 659 SNGs analysis (Low content)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Can you teach me how to win coinflips? My skill seems to lack in this area of SNGs

[/ QUOTE ]

Please explain. Did you slip into a coma in the middle of posting that and just wake up?