$27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?)
 

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t400 (2 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Hero (t3875)
Button (t9625)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
Button calls t200, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t3850</font>, Button calls t3450.

Flop: (t7525) J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

Turn: (t7525) 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

River: (t7525) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>

Final Pot: t7525

Results below
Hero has 8h 5s (high card, king).
Button has 4d 5d (one pair, fours).
Outcome: Button wins t7525

Bleh. I was fairly confident he had trash again. He decides to make a stand with 54... cuz it's s0000ted!

At least I had my money in with the best hand, and with 8-high there's not much more I can ask.

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

stupid overbetters

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?)
 

[ QUOTE ]


Bleh. I was fairly confident he had trash again. He decides to make a stand with 54... cuz it's s0000ted!

At least I had my money in with the best hand, and with 8-high there's not much more I can ask.

[/ QUOTE ]
I wouldn't feel too bad since any reasonable hand beat you.

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

Are you serious? I had tremendous fold equity here versus most players and about 9 BBs. I need to pick up a lot of these pots when he shows weakness like he does here.

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

I bet you watch a lot of the WPT and WSOP shows.

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?)
 

[ QUOTE ]

Bleh. I was fairly confident he had trash again.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, amazing "read."

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

Nope.

I'm not saying I made the best play in the world either. But which play is substantially worse:

Sometimes pushing all-in with any two cards after your opponent shows weakness, while short-stacked.

Sometimes calling an all-in with 5-high after your opponent shows strength, with a 2:1 chip advantage.

The point of this post was not that I made some great play. The point of this post was this was the worst limp-call I've ever seen. I've never seen someone do this with 5-high before.

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

[ QUOTE ]
Nope.

I'm not saying I made the best play in the world either. But which play is substantially worse:

Sometimes pushing all-in with any two cards after your opponent shows weakness, while short-stacked.

Sometimes calling an all-in with 5-high after your opponent shows strength, with a 2:1 chip advantage.

The point of this post was not that I made some great play. The point of this post was this was the worst limp-call I've ever seen. I've never seen someone do this with 5-high before.

[/ QUOTE ]

What forum do you think you are in?

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

I was the villain in this hand and I knew the OP had trash, so it was a fairly easy call, and it turned out to be the right one

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?)
 

Yeah I agree with you, he shouldn't call with 45. I prefer to check since you still have a decent amount of blinds heads up but yeah if you're going to raise then it has to be all in. Beware though of this play, people do limp strong hands heads up in sng's for precisely this reason. His justification that he knew you had trash too is the biggest load of rubbish ever, he still can't call.

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?)
 

he knew the 4 was coming, you need to stop thinking about what he had preflop and work on your flop, turn, and rivers

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?)
 

... lol everyone that's saying this is such a bad hand is extremely wrong. standard push.

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?)
 

[ QUOTE ]
... lol everyone that's saying this is such a bad hand is extremely wrong. standard push.

[/ QUOTE ]

if he got called by 54s, no it isn't

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

[ QUOTE ]
I was the villain in this hand and I knew the OP had trash, so it was a fairly easy call, and it turned out to be the right one

[/ QUOTE ]

...Good call...wrong forum [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

lol, DONK n GOs

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

I knew the villain was very loose, like 50/13 or whatever, but he's folded to my raises before, so I really didn't expect him to call here.

[ QUOTE ]

What forum do you think you are in?

[/ QUOTE ]

I wasn't sure whether this would be better in STT or here. Variance in the sense that I lost a 70/30, I guess. Not that I'd post every 70/30 here or anything; this simply was the worst call I've ever seen.

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers (worst ever?)
 

[ QUOTE ]
he knew the 4 was coming, you need to stop thinking about what he had preflop and work on your flop, turn, and rivers

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. This week I really need to improve on outflopping my opponents.

Isn't it illegal if the villain doesn't tell you he's a psychic, has a pattern mapper, or whatever? I mean, that just isn't fair.

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

[ QUOTE ]
I knew the villain was very loose, like 50/13 or whatever, but he's folded to my raises before, so I really didn't expect him to call here.

[ QUOTE ]

What forum do you think you are in?

[/ QUOTE ]

I wasn't sure whether this would be better in STT or here. Variance in the sense that I lost a 70/30, I guess. Not that I'd post every 70/30 here or anything; this simply was the worst call I've ever seen.

[/ QUOTE ]

worst call ever? Dude Ive seen people call money while playing the board on the river when 9 high would beat them

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

In this situation... yes, worst call ever. I'm talking pre-flop here. I have never seen someone limp, then call a substantial raise all-in for half their stack while heads-up with 54s.

There's very ways it could have been worse - 53, 52, 43, 42, 32. And I've never seen those yet. So... worst call ever. Show me someone calling with one of those worse hands in this situation.

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

dude I clearly made the correct call, and imho it was a great call and you got pwn3d, therefore it cannot possibly be thought of as a bad call.

Re: $27 SNGs - stupid limp-callers
 

Fair enough. Nice trolling.