Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=225200)

Tickner 10-01-2006 12:54 AM

KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
Just sat down........

Party Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.50/$1
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $246.55
UTG+1: $99.50
CO: $98.50
Tickner: $102.80
SB: $269.51
BB: $99

Pre-flop: (6 players) Tickner is Button with K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
UTG calls, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 raises to $5</font>, CO folds, Tickner calls, SB calls, BB folds, UTG calls.

Flop: 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($21, 4 players)
SB checks, UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#cc0000">Tickner bets $18</font>, SB calls, 2 folds.

Turn: 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($57, 2 players)
SB checks, Tickner checks.

River: 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($57, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">SB bets $45</font>, Tickner Insta-calls.

Push_Fold 10-01-2006 12:57 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
Calling pre w/KTs is pretty thin. If I make that call I need to make or have a draw to a big hand on the flop. You flop TPGK and that is about all. With no reads I am not going to far with this.

Count Stackula 10-01-2006 01:00 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
I would fold the river....Also i am not calling this preflop (i know you were not asking for preflop advice though coz whatever works for you works)...but yea..i am folding this river

cbloom 10-01-2006 01:09 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
I would fold preflop. Hard to guess what SB has here. I might call cuz I'm curious, but it can easily be something like K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

Tickner 10-01-2006 01:35 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
Its also just as easy to put him on a FD with no pair.

MLSchaff 10-01-2006 02:25 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
I'm checking the flop behind here. Its unlikely that you are going to take down the pot against 3 villains, and when you are called you have no idea of knowing where you are at. Without stats/reads I'm folding river here.

wall_st 10-01-2006 02:31 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
Does this belong in BBV because you made some awesome call on a scary board with no reads ? I think this is pretty bad I am checking the flop and def folding the river in this situation. Maybe heads up it is a different story, but at .5/1 nl not that many villans like to bluff their busted flush draws.

Keyser. 10-01-2006 02:35 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
I think this is probably fine. He probably is slowplaying a monster at about the same frequency he is bluffing.

Tickner 10-01-2006 02:44 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
Does this belong in BBV because you made some awesome call on a scary board with no reads ? I think this is pretty bad I am checking the flop and def folding the river in this situation. Maybe heads up it is a different story, but at .5/1 nl not that many villans like to bluff their busted flush draws.

[/ QUOTE ]

What?

I think that busted draws are probably the main source of SSNL bluffs.

catalyst 10-01-2006 03:18 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
I am folding to this bet on the river. SB's calling your near PSB on the flop with 2 players left behind is scary. Given his actions, I think he is slowplaying a made hand here and I will give up on the river to his 4/5 pot bet. Without a good read on the player as having a tendency to make near PS bluffs on the river I am pitching this hand.

quarkncover 10-01-2006 03:21 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
I thought lego poker was a cool idea. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Oh yeah, Keyser_Soze is right on [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Dan Bitel 10-01-2006 08:11 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
Except the preflop call, this hand is pretty standard, no?

True 10-01-2006 08:22 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
this hand is super standard including the preflop call...

Don't understand why anyone advocates any different...

True

Tickner 10-01-2006 08:39 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
ok just making sure, thx.

quarkncover, what do you mean?

Kharlog 10-01-2006 09:03 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
I'd make psb on turn and check on river if got called...

kapw7 10-01-2006 10:49 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
What are we afraid of? K5?
Ppl wo think it's an easy fold lack essential hand reading skills.

Take that with a grain of salt - coming from a LHE player. I would be glad if someone could convince me to the opposite.

True 10-01-2006 11:05 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
What are we afraid of? K5?
Ppl wo think it's an easy fold lack essential hand reading skills.

Take that with a grain of salt - coming from a LHE player. I would be glad if someone could convince me to the opposite.

[/ QUOTE ]

K5 we aren't really scared of. We are scared of a made flush, a set, flopped 2 pair, K-x better than a T, etc.

True

wslee00 10-01-2006 11:51 AM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
no one likes bet turn, fold river?

kapw7 10-01-2006 12:23 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
What are we afraid of? K5?
Ppl wo think it's an easy fold lack essential hand reading skills.

Take that with a grain of salt - coming from a LHE player. I would be glad if someone could convince me to the opposite.

[/ QUOTE ]

K5 we aren't really scared of. We are scared of a made flush, a set, flopped 2 pair, K-x better than a T, etc.

True

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, I was being sarcastic about the K5. I just can't see how villain would have the range you describe 66% of times on avg. Again, I'm only making a discussion trying to learn.

So did you totally abandon LHE, True? or better... Traitor! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Tickner 10-01-2006 01:38 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
So did you totally abandon LHE, True? or better... Traitor! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

don't tell anyone, but LHE really sucks.

EDIT: I say this as a LHE -&gt; NLHE player

I also should add that having a LHE background as a NLHE player makes you that much better.

delta k 10-01-2006 01:39 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
EZ river call

Requin 10-01-2006 02:24 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
I'd fold. Villain is not betting a worse made hand on the river, he'd c/c. Basically all you beat is a bluff, and given the flop call he always flopped something, so he never has total air. He isn't calling the flop with the bare Kh even (unless he's awful). So you beat pretty much only an Ah that decided to play fairly passively, and now wants to bluff.

True 10-01-2006 02:33 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'd fold. Villain is not betting a worse made hand on the river, he'd c/c. Basically all you beat is a bluff, and given the flop call he always flopped something, so he never has total air. He isn't calling the flop with the bare Kh even (unless he's awful). So you beat pretty much only an Ah that decided to play fairly passively, and now wants to bluff.

[/ QUOTE ]

9-xh, loads more hands, gutshots with or without a heart... a pair with a heart in, etc.

True

Keepitsimple 10-01-2006 02:33 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
I think its a fold. The bet is too large for a blocking bet. So its either a good hand or a bluff.

Fly 10-01-2006 02:36 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
Except the preflop call, this hand is pretty standard, no?

[/ QUOTE ]

Requin 10-01-2006 02:37 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
9-xh, loads more hands, gutshots with or without a heart... a pair with a heart in, etc.

[/ QUOTE ] No gutshots call there on the flop, that's horrible. Hands worse than yours will c/c the river I think.

QuentinCompson 10-01-2006 03:10 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
no one likes bet turn, fold river?

[/ QUOTE ]

by checking the turn behind we almost force villain to bet the river with any hand... and by calling the river we can get value out of worse hands and bluffs

betting the turn only gains value if a draw calls... any worse made hand will fold... we can be quite sure to see a showdown if we check the turn and call a river bet (or check behind if checked to)

remember, villain only has to have a worse hand about 1 in 3 times to make the river a call (I think that math is somewhat close...)

QuentinCompson 10-01-2006 03:10 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
9-xh, loads more hands, gutshots with or without a heart... a pair with a heart in, etc.

[/ QUOTE ] No gutshots call there on the flop, that's horrible. Hands worse than yours will c/c the river I think.

[/ QUOTE ]

A missed draw will never c/c the river

Dumle 10-01-2006 03:59 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
If I intend to call that river bet, I would definately bet the turn.

Dumle

True 10-01-2006 04:58 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
If I intend to call that river bet, I would definately bet the turn.

Dumle

[/ QUOTE ]

ummm, this is wrong... If you intend to fold the river, then bet the turn, if you intend to call the river, checking is best.

True

DaveRockNo20 10-01-2006 05:08 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If I intend to call that river bet, I would definately bet the turn.

Dumle

[/ QUOTE ]

ummm, this is wrong... If you intend to fold the river, then bet the turn, if you intend to call the river, checking is best.

True

[/ QUOTE ]

yup

Dumle 10-01-2006 05:16 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
ummm, this is wrong... If you intend to fold the river, then bet the turn, if you intend to call the river, checking is best.


[/ QUOTE ]

You misunderstood me. I am only putting in money on one street here and I prefer to do that on turn, rather than river.

Dumle

Tickner 10-01-2006 06:06 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ummm, this is wrong... If you intend to fold the river, then bet the turn, if you intend to call the river, checking is best.


[/ QUOTE ]

You misunderstood me. I am only putting in money on one street here and I prefer to do that on turn, rather than river.

Dumle

[/ QUOTE ]

He understands this but he (and I for that matter) think you are putting it in on the wrong street.

True 10-01-2006 07:01 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ummm, this is wrong... If you intend to fold the river, then bet the turn, if you intend to call the river, checking is best.


[/ QUOTE ]

You misunderstood me. I am only putting in money on one street here and I prefer to do that on turn, rather than river.

Dumle

[/ QUOTE ]

He understands this but he (and I for that matter) think you are putting it in on the wrong street.

[/ QUOTE ]

If we bet the turn and a heart comes on the river, we lose money....

If villain would bluff the river and also call a bet lighter on the river because no heart came down and he doesn't have to worry about a flush coming in and also thinks we may be bluffing then checking the turn is best.

The more passive and stupid the opponent is requires more of a rethink into where we should be betting.

For instance :

Loose / Passive &lt; --------------------- &gt; Aggressive
Bet Turn &lt; --------------------- &gt; Bet river

The relationship between these 2 is almost directly proportional.

True

Dumle 10-01-2006 07:13 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
He understands this but he (and I for that matter) think you are putting it in on the wrong street.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you intend to call a river bet, which I am not sure you should, there's so many reason for betting this turn instead. The times you have him beat and he doesn't improve you will more than likely get to showdown anyway, so getting to showdown is not really an issue here.

If he has the ace of hearts, you really should charge him for that. If he calls, he is making a mistake. If he folds, well that's good also, much better than giving him a free card. The key here is that you will not make up for lost money on the turn on the river, since he will not bluff often enough, or big enough, with missed draws.

You can safely fold to a check-raise. If he is on a draw, he will more than likely push it on the flop, so a check-raise here means most of the time a real hand.

That's some of them, I can probably come up with a couple of more if I get some time.

Dumle

Dumle 10-01-2006 07:18 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
[ QUOTE ]
If we bet the turn and a heart comes on the river, we lose money....


[/ QUOTE ]

Not true, if he didn't have the odds to call, we gain.

[ QUOTE ]
If villain would bluff the river and also call a bet lighter on the river because no heart came down and he doesn't have to worry about a flush coming in and also thinks we may be bluffing then checking the turn is best.


[/ QUOTE ]

I don't see many weaker hands calling this flop, that doesn't contain a heart. And if he indeed has a heart, it is imperative to bet turn.

[ QUOTE ]
For instance :

Loose / Passive &lt; --------------------- &gt; Aggressive
Bet Turn &lt; --------------------- &gt; Bet river

The relationship between these 2 is almost directly proportional.


[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, but there are more things to consider when deciding whether to bet turn or river, such as the texture of the board, what you hold, etc. Plus, OP didn't give us a read on the opponent so this is not really relevant.

Dumle

True 10-01-2006 08:33 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
Dumle, you are completely under-estimating the bluffing frequency or value bet frequency of a weaker hand on this river in my honest opinion.

You can argue that betting the turn is imperitive, however there are a couple of flaws in your extrapolation of his ranges.

Your range is : Naked Draws = 20% equity, Draws + made hands = 30% equity, Made hands that beat us = ~95% equity.

If villain never c/r the turn as a bluff and never bets the river with a worse hand, then as long as Naked Draws and Weaker Made hands + draws = ~2x Stronger made hands then your analysis is correct.

I however think there is some merit to dismantling this range slightly, also to disagree with the fact that he doesn't c/r with a weaker hand... Your definition of this player puts him squarely on the diagram where we should check the turn, however a more unknown player has more erratic tendencies. The diagram is slightly skewed to show that against an unknown player we should favour or at least give thought to the fact that there would be merit in waiting to the river. Not everyone would release middle pair here on the flop, not everyone would release a gutshot. "We may have Ah-x on the river" and Villain may try and bluff his way to the pot, we have played this hand in similar fashion to that of Ah-x and it could easily be perceived to Villain that we would fold this.

A lot of players will bluff this river given this situation, and there are a lot of hands that we are ahead of. Betting the turn also knocks out weak flush draws, weaker made hands that would have invested money in the river in the form of a c/c or a bluff which we can capitalise on.

True

Don Key E37 10-01-2006 08:56 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
I probably fold k 10 suited to a good size utg raise but thats just me and I think its fine. Flop good. Turn good. I definetly think this is the way to go here, and dont think the times you are ahead make betting here worth the times you are behind or drawing dead.

River: Well this is tough, and I completely see why you decided to post this hand, and am very suprised you instacalled. I'm trying more and more to take my time with these tough decisions, especially on the turn and river where the bets are usually much bigger. After the way we played the turn, it seems like you almost have to call. As you were basically hoping for Ah qx or whatever to bluff at it on the river. The problem is poor players love to check raise. And if he happended to be a limit holdem convert they love the check call/ check raise line, and many do this all the time with sets in limit holdem. He could also be trying for this line with ah Kx. So again this spot is tough. I almost feel that this is a 0 EV play. I think the times you pick off a bluff, or worse hand are probably about even to the times you are ahead.

So I really have no advice, other than I don't think you would've played the hand bad whatever you decided to do on the river.

matrix 10-01-2006 09:00 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
some of you guys are giving villain here waaaaaaaaaaaaay too much credit imo.

I'm with db/quark/keyser - this hand is superdeluxe standard (if we turn a blind eye to pf)

If we check the turn we are committed to calling pretty much any bet on any safe river. I think OP's line here is more +EV than betting the turn IME *lots* of villains (especially those with ~300BB stacks who are more likely to be gambooolers) tend to bluff the river if we check the turn through.

Tickner 10-01-2006 09:05 PM

Re: KTs , Insta call on river with 1 pair
 
Can someone PLEASE explain to me whats wrong with the PF call?

Me an True talked quite a bit about this hand and we both agree that every street is pretty standard, especially preflop.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.