The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

Moneymaker arose as televised poker (lipstack cams, etc.) and Internet Poker (Party, PS, etc.) were breaking out big in popularity. The fact that he looks like every dumb schmuck from middle America made it very easy for your average young male American to think -- HEY! if he could do it, I could do it!

Now, there are far fewer people that don't know about the existence of "organized" poker (as opposed to kitchen table poker), there are new impedements to playing online, and Jerry Yang isn't the folksy guy from the midwest. His effect on the poker world and the recruitment of new player will be far smaller than Moneymaker's.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

He will, however, be bringing the Jesus factor in. You can't buy that kind of booster.

Pretty soon we'll be seeing old guys get up from the table saying, 'Jesus, bring me my gutshot! Oh Lord, sweet Jesus Lord!', calling with 2:1 odds on the turn. This is going to be sweet.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

no. poker=busto.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
. . . and Jerry Yang isn't the folksy guy from the midwest. . .

[/ QUOTE ]

LMAO - Tennessee is now in the Midwest?

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

Sorry to repeat this, but I don't get any feedback on why it isn't a good set of ideas:

1. some day it might take any WSOP champion to help the poker community by signing up with a rakefree poker site, to end the ridiculous prevalence of players' expectations that they have to pay a rake. Since it is hopeful that any new champion will have more than enough money to live on, and who might not even want to play poker much afterwards (a la Yang) a reasonable deal can be struck with a site such as wsex.com (and I am not advocating any specific site, rather the idea that if any sites offer something very generous and advantageous to players as a whole, then it seems that the collective intelligence would work to reciprocate capitalize on this eventually, in its own interests) where the champion could even hope that players could voluntarily opt for parts of their 100% rakeback be contributed to charities of their choice (hearkening back to a Yang-like disposition, though prior to Negreanu's move to stars I had suggested this idea several times--no doubt Negreanu knows what is best for him, but what about the rest of the poker paying public?) and this could even be done via the float's interest or parlaying sports bets with charity to get that extra entertainment bang.

Are you following me so far? (and yes, it doesn't take brains to try and shoot it down, rather, it takes persistence and brains to get this idea started).

2. collective power amongst poker players can do several amazing and positive things if channeled logically. For instance, the concept of tipping in a more centralized manner (again with free choice for all) where players opt out of the usual routine (wear a button and tell your dealer) and contribute to an annual (or any periodic) award, however imperfectly constructed, to the best dealers in the world. We are talking about tips that must exceed $100M to $200M annually, so why not disburse these through fairly audited and judged merit based metrics? The joke being that an annual $100M winner-take-all (just one variant) prize would facilitate a quantum leap in dealing quality and you'd get brain surgeons vying for that prize, hence a better pool of talent for new dealers. Meanwhile, casinos would have to pick up the slack and pay decent wages etc. during the quick transition. Imagine any dealer paying attention so carefully all year to keep the lowest error rate possible and to be fair to all players, and whatever else it takes to excel, etc. The best deserve to be rewarded, (it's the American way, lol) the general manner with which most of us are ROUTINELY tipping today UTTERLY AND UNEQUIVOCALLY FAILS TO ACHIEVE MUCH OF ITS PURPOSE AND POTENTIAL.

It's not the specificity of the ideas I'm pushing that matters, but the lost opportunities of MANY well-considered methods of improving the QUALITY AND VALUE OF EXPERIENCE FOR ALL POKER PLAYERS THAT IS VERY PUZZLING TO ME.

The reason it doesn't happen is only because unorganized players play for various other reasons, entertainment, compulsion, and action.

Once we use our heads, with the appropriate reasoning and talent, guys like Raymer, Lederer, Ferguson, Bloch, Negreanu and any next generic champion could wake up and lead us.

I'd lead but you guys don't know who the hell I am.

So step up, somebody. Please. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

tl;dnr

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

A) Not even close

B) People saying he will bring the Jesus factor is just silly. ESPN will very likely not broadcast all that crap he said during allins

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
tl;dnr

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey. Thanks for taking your precious time to post.

Guess you prefer books with pictures, eh? [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
B) People saying he will bring the Jesus factor is just silly. ESPN will very likely not broadcast all that crap he said during allins

[/ QUOTE ]

I certainly hope they don't. If the live PPV hadn't broadcast that or his screams, he would have been a lot more popular with everyone.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
. . . and Jerry Yang isn't the folksy guy from the midwest. . .

[/ QUOTE ]

LMAO - Tennessee is now in the Midwest?

[/ QUOTE ]

LMAO -- selective quotations...

Relax buddy, if that makes you laugh your a** off, then it don't take much. -- I said middle America when talking about Moneymaker and never said he was from the midwest. It is probably what I meant to type for Yang as well, but went too quickly.

Middle America is a purposefully much more vague term.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
B) People saying he will bring the Jesus factor is just silly. ESPN will very likely not broadcast all that crap he said during allins

[/ QUOTE ]
I bet ESPN wont show Humberto being a douche either. LOLOLOLOLOL

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
tl;dnr

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey. Thanks for taking your precious time to post.

Guess you prefer books with pictures, eh? [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

it was too long -- but it is also too confusing and has nothing to do with the theme of this thread. Why not start your own thread about how poker champions can make the world (poker world and broader world) a better place and not hijack this one?

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
tl;dnr

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey. Thanks for taking your precious time to post.

Guess you prefer books with pictures, eh? [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

it was too long -- but it is also too confusing and has nothing to do with the theme of this thread. Why not start your own thread about how poker champions can make the world (poker world and broader world) a better place and not hijack this one?

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you do me a favor?

Paste my post into a new thread and take credit for it.

I assure you, it's sheer genius if you take the time to read it--for it's simplicity and veracity.

The point remains, why be a douche and post tl; dnr?

Try reading it one sentence a day.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
tl;dnr

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey. Thanks for taking your precious time to post.

Guess you prefer books with pictures, eh? [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

it was too long -- but it is also too confusing and has nothing to do with the theme of this thread. Why not start your own thread about how poker champions can make the world (poker world and broader world) a better place and not hijack this one?

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you do me a favor?

Paste my post into a new thread and take credit for it.

I assure you, it's sheer genius if you take the time to read it--for it's simplicity and veracity.

The point remains, why be a douche and post tl; dnr?

Try reading it one sentence a day.

[/ QUOTE ]


tl;dnr

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
A) Not even close

B) People saying he will bring the Jesus factor is just silly. ESPN will very likely not broadcast all that crap he said during allins

[/ QUOTE ]

lol why not. I think it'd be awesome. I found it annoying but it'd sure make a great story.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]

I assure you, it's sheer genius if you take the time to read it--for it's simplicity and veracity.


[/ QUOTE ]

Mmmmmh....

200 posts, 3 stars, ...

Obviously a genius at work!

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

what's the *** for? Can you explain?

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

Stars are handed down by the board moderators, for posting something offensive, illegal or downright stupid.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
Try reading it one sentence a day.

[/ QUOTE ]

OK.

[ QUOTE ]
some day it might take any WSOP champion to help the poker community by signing up with a rakefree poker site, to end the ridiculous prevalence of players' expectations that they have to pay a rake.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sentences generally start with capital letters. Assuming this is a "sentence" it makes little sense. It appears you mean to use the indefinite word "someday" but instead use the two words "some day."

You say that "it might take any WSOP champion to help the poker community" -- what does that phrase mean? Do you mean to say "A WSOP champion might help the poker community" by "signing up" with a "rakefree" poker site?

And by "signing up" do you mean getting an account with a site that does not collect rake or do you require that the player actually sign a sponsorship agreement with such a site?

What if that site does not offer him the compensation that PokerStars or FTP offers?

And how would this unnamed "any WSOP champion" end a "ridiculous prevalance" in "players' expectations"? Try not using large words unnecessarily...

Instead you might consider saying that "If a World Series of Poker champion was to agree to promote one of the poker sites that does not charge rake (or rebates 100% of the rake to the players), he might persuade many more players that they do not have to pay rake to play poker online."

There is the sentence for today. If I feel the urge, we will go to the next sentence tomorrow. Better yet, if you believe you have something important to offer and want to persuade us, why don't you take the time necessary to think carefully about what you are going to say and how are you going to say it before you spew it to the world?

Have a good evening.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Try reading it one sentence a day.

[/ QUOTE ]

OK.

[ QUOTE ]
some day it might take any WSOP champion to help the poker community by signing up with a rakefree poker site, to end the ridiculous prevalence of players' expectations that they have to pay a rake.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sentences generally start with capital letters. Assuming this is a "sentence" it makes little sense. It appears you mean to use the indefinite word "someday" but instead use the two words "some day."

You say that "it might take any WSOP champion to help the poker community" -- what does that phrase mean? Do you mean to say "A WSOP champion might help the poker community" by "signing up" with a "rakefree" poker site?

And by "signing up" do you mean getting an account with a site that does not collect rake or do you require that the player actually sign a sponsorship agreement with such a site?

What if that site does not offer him the compensation that PokerStars or FTP offers?

And how would this unnamed "any WSOP champion" end a "ridiculous prevalance" in "players' expectations"? Try not using large words unnecessarily...

Instead you might consider saying that "If a World Series of Poker champion was to agree to promote one of the poker sites that does not charge rake (or rebates 100% of the rake to the players), he might persuade many more players that they do not have to pay rake to play poker online."

There is the sentence for today. If I feel the urge, we will go to the next sentence tomorrow. Better yet, if you believe you have something important to offer and want to persuade us, why don't you take the time necessary to think carefully about what you are going to say and how are you going to say it before you spew it to the world?

Have a good evening.

[/ QUOTE ]

SKOOLED!

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
tl;dnr

[/ QUOTE ]

tl;dr

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
Stars are handed down by the board moderators, for posting something offensive, illegal or downright stupid.

[/ QUOTE ]
Oh OK, thanks! Surprised I don't see that many *************************** then [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
A) Not even close

B) People saying he will bring the Jesus factor is just silly. ESPN will very likely not broadcast all that crap he said during allins

[/ QUOTE ]

lol why not. I think it'd be awesome. I found it annoying but it'd sure make a great story.

[/ QUOTE ]

I bet they will. And even if they don't, I imagine he will be fairly public speaking about his religion and about how he donated 10% to his church or whatever (didn't he?). The tables will probably not be littered with religious folk now (who are by nature stupid and therefore bad at poker -- just kidding -- sort of) but it couldn't hurt.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
A) Not even close

B) People saying he will bring the Jesus factor is just silly. ESPN will very likely not broadcast all that crap he said during allins

[/ QUOTE ]
no he gave money to:

the Make-A-Wish Foundation, Feed the Children, and the Ronald McDonald House

feed the children is loosely related to the catholic church

lol why not. I think it'd be awesome. I found it annoying but it'd sure make a great story.

[/ QUOTE ]

I bet they will. And even if they don't, I imagine he will be fairly public speaking about his religion and about how he donated 10% to his church or whatever (didn't he?). The tables will probably not be littered with religious folk now (who are by nature stupid and therefore bad at poker -- just kidding -- sort of) but it couldn't hurt.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

Real Estate is location, location, location.

Poker is ESPN, ESPN, ESPN.

Moneymaker just happened to be the one who won when the four letter decided to take it big time.

Yes, he is "everyman" but television had more to do with it than anything.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

I think what will be interesting is to see how all this money effects his faith in the years to come.

Money can be the biggest test of one's faith and I wish him the best and hope he is well grounded.

Time will tell whether all this money destroys him like some of the lottery winners.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
Sorry to repeat this, but I don't get any feedback on why it isn't a good set of ideas:

1. some day it might take any WSOP champion to help the poker community by signing up with a rakefree poker site, to end the ridiculous prevalence of players' expectations that they have to pay a rake. Since it is hopeful that any new champion will have more than enough money to live on, and who might not even want to play poker much afterwards (a la Yang) a reasonable deal can be struck with a site such as wsex.com (and I am not advocating any specific site, rather the idea that if any sites offer something very generous and advantageous to players as a whole, then it seems that the collective intelligence would work to reciprocate capitalize on this eventually, in its own interests) where the champion could even hope that players could voluntarily opt for parts of their 100% rakeback be contributed to charities of their choice (hearkening back to a Yang-like disposition, though prior to Negreanu's move to stars I had suggested this idea several times--no doubt Negreanu knows what is best for him, but what about the rest of the poker paying public?) and this could even be done via the float's interest or parlaying sports bets with charity to get that extra entertainment bang.

Are you following me so far? (and yes, it doesn't take brains to try and shoot it down, rather, it takes persistence and brains to get this idea started).

2. collective power amongst poker players can do several amazing and positive things if channeled logically. For instance, the concept of tipping in a more centralized manner (again with free choice for all) where players opt out of the usual routine (wear a button and tell your dealer) and contribute to an annual (or any periodic) award, however imperfectly constructed, to the best dealers in the world. We are talking about tips that must exceed $100M to $200M annually, so why not disburse these through fairly audited and judged merit based metrics? The joke being that an annual $100M winner-take-all (just one variant) prize would facilitate a quantum leap in dealing quality and you'd get brain surgeons vying for that prize, hence a better pool of talent for new dealers. Meanwhile, casinos would have to pick up the slack and pay decent wages etc. during the quick transition. Imagine any dealer paying attention so carefully all year to keep the lowest error rate possible and to be fair to all players, and whatever else it takes to excel, etc. The best deserve to be rewarded, (it's the American way, lol) the general manner with which most of us are ROUTINELY tipping today UTTERLY AND UNEQUIVOCALLY FAILS TO ACHIEVE MUCH OF ITS PURPOSE AND POTENTIAL.

It's not the specificity of the ideas I'm pushing that matters, but the lost opportunities of MANY well-considered methods of improving the QUALITY AND VALUE OF EXPERIENCE FOR ALL POKER PLAYERS THAT IS VERY PUZZLING TO ME.

The reason it doesn't happen is only because unorganized players play for various other reasons, entertainment, compulsion, and action.

Once we use our heads, with the appropriate reasoning and talent, guys like Raymer, Lederer, Ferguson, Bloch, Negreanu and any next generic champion could wake up and lead us.

I'd lead but you guys don't know who the hell I am.

So step up, somebody. Please. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

After a single 177 word sentence, you ask "Are you following me so far?", and then you proceed to emit another few hefty blocks of total gibberish. Somehow, I don't think you give a damn about the answer.

Despite the genius displayed by Jack Kerouac in his wonderful novel On the Road, not every scatter-shot sequence of random verbiage is a work of art.

Have some self-respect man. Your parents and your neighbors paid property taxes so that you could learn the basic stuff by sixth grade. You should be embarrassed by this drivel.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
B) People saying he will bring the Jesus factor is just silly. ESPN will very likely not broadcast all that crap he said during allins

[/ QUOTE ]

I certainly hope they don't. If the live PPV hadn't broadcast that or his screams, he would have been a lot more popular with everyone.

[/ QUOTE ]
It wasn't broadcast so much as everyone's microphone was just up the entire time. I am sure they will edit Yang's antics out, but we got to hear it all, even when he was screaming away from the table. hycahcyahcyahasppft.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Try reading it one sentence a day.

[/ QUOTE ]

OK.

[ QUOTE ]
some day it might take any WSOP champion to help the poker community by signing up with a rakefree poker site, to end the ridiculous prevalence of players' expectations that they have to pay a rake.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sentences generally start with capital letters. Assuming this is a "sentence" it makes little sense. It appears you mean to use the indefinite word "someday" but instead use the two words "some day."

You say that "it might take any WSOP champion to help the poker community" -- what does that phrase mean? Do you mean to say "A WSOP champion might help the poker community" by "signing up" with a "rakefree" poker site?

And by "signing up" do you mean getting an account with a site that does not collect rake or do you require that the player actually sign a sponsorship agreement with such a site?

What if that site does not offer him the compensation that PokerStars or FTP offers?

And how would this unnamed "any WSOP champion" end a "ridiculous prevalance" in "players' expectations"? Try not using large words unnecessarily...

Instead you might consider saying that "If a World Series of Poker champion was to agree to promote one of the poker sites that does not charge rake (or rebates 100% of the rake to the players), he might persuade many more players that they do not have to pay rake to play poker online."

There is the sentence for today. If I feel the urge, we will go to the next sentence tomorrow. Better yet, if you believe you have something important to offer and want to persuade us, why don't you take the time necessary to think carefully about what you are going to say and how are you going to say it before you spew it to the world?

Have a good evening.

[/ QUOTE ]

The second sentence is 177 words, and it's even more nonsensical. I suggest you skip Friday and save it for the weekend.

Remember to drink heavily before reading it; I'm sure that's what it took for him to write it.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

Wow, you guys are such morons.

I scored in the 99.99998th percentile in all portions of the Four Sigma test, which is not designed to accurately measure beyond the level I surpassed.

I scored two 800s in the GRE with about 30 minutes to spare in 1986.

Sklansky often has typos, so I will strive to increase mine just to annoy you idiots.

Yeah, thrilling rebuttals, an ad hominem attack re *** (one post in OOT, it was the moderator's prejudice and stupidity), and wow, missing capital letters, oooh ...somedayyouwillallunderstandnot.

So, you are really too dense to understand my post?

Do you realize I do this for free? Other geniuses charge!

Do you understand that I've repeated it so often that I type 84 words a minute because I'm so brilliant?

Idon'thave togive you perfectspelling orgrammar but you morons miss the ideasthatserve your interests!

Somedayyouwillsee, I offersavingsand service today, but youwill take it someday in thefutureinstead aw3robod!

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

i have a nest of two pigeon chicks by my mansion, i Will now put one in a pickle jar and the other under a box

the mother will fret

i will eat a pigeon for din-din tonight

and another for breakfast

yum

unless you tell the dealers no more tipping for crappy service!

and one of you win next year's WSOP mE to do what I said, or I will win it and show you.

rake-free poker 4 all, do you get it now? hmmMmmmmMmmmMh?

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

ask your dealer for his/her email address, so you can tip via paypal instead of diluting their pooled tips with non-dealers

if the management thwarts you, here's how you modify your approach

assuming one casino per zip code, ask the dealer what his/her favorite number is (coded by "how many children do you have? so as to allow them to give you their chosen number without punishment).

Then you know beforehand because of my magnificent post here

yes here!

here?

yes!!

that the syntax to paypal them is...:;#

first name dot favorite number dot zip code @gmail.com

so you can tip them for great service, and not get bad service for those who don't deserve nuthin

now do you see yet more of my genius?

and the casinos, they have to respond by paying more!

ah haha hah aha

another brilliant idea cumming in a few minutes...

after I take a dump

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

okey you [censored] maorans, here's yett another genius idea from me

what's the combined dollar amount that all pokersites expend sponsoring their selfish self-intersted stars?

NOW, listen up dummies, what's the combined rake world wide in the same time period?

NOw, for you imbiciles, what's the combined annual tips in any given year, and by the way stupid, hw are your liking the service? [censored], right?

yeah, now do some math and correct the probl;em, ducy?

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

Poker economics is in the dark ages, you guys are fools right now.

Corporations shoudl be paying us to be seen.

We shoulldn't have to pay rake, it's gifted to us by wsex and you maorians don'teven pappreciate it.

we should award $100M, $200M prizes to the best dealers annually, for merit.

I know a great dealer in Niagara Falls, Hi Kevin!

so far I know no better dealer in the US, Hey Kev, you want $200M this year? Keep up your usual great work, you deserve a $1B afaic.

Brain surgeons, hedgefundmanagerse, line up, deal for us at our pleasrue. get it now? maorians.

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
I scored two 800s in the GRE with about 30 minutes to spare in 1986.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL at you bragging about something in 1986. Let me guess... You were in EXPO when you were in the 5th grade too? Can I be your friend? Or do you just live in the past?

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

Customer: Hey professor, great deal of that last hand, I like how you kept order at the table, by the way, using the Rome II protocols, what do you think of my diagnosis for irritable bowel syndrome (diarrhea)?

Dealer: I'm an astronomy professor.

Customer: Oh, sorry about that, how are the wife, the kids, and the latest Lyman-alpha blob that is emanating from the anuses of the retarded posters responding the Great Seemorenuts coming along?

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I scored two 800s in the GRE with about 30 minutes to spare in 1986.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL at you bragging about something in 1986. Let me guess... You were in EXPO when you were in the 5th grade too? Can I be your friend? Or do you just live in the past?

[/ QUOTE ]

Face it, you just can't handle it.

so i dum down my posts to your level maybe you et it, okey?

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

I live in the present and the future.

Yes, I can travel to the future.

Here's what's going to happen soon, and my genius got the ball rolling, you Maorians.

Total poker tips worldwide annually (conservatively): $30.01B

Level of service extracted by these tips: zero, +/- $10K


New format of rewarding dealers:

Lowest error rates, best ability to explain questions politely, best personality, ability to keep game flowing, hands per down average, fairness and impariality are all measured at a cost of $10M annually.

This still leaves $30B to disburse as awards, with a possible Hall of Fame and other perks to multiple year winners.

Which do you prefer, dealers?

$30B annually to the best dealer, winner take all;

or $18B, $9B, $3B to the top three finishers?

....



$1B to the best 30 dealers per year?


....


$1M to the best 30000 dealers per year?


Hey, i got the numbers all wronge, but what do I now, I only gots the higheset high ghi hi iq that everyone is so damn jealous about, do you get it ow?

Re: The Moneymaker Effect Pt II - The Yang Addendum
 

Oh crape, I forgot the interest on the float, that's mine to keep. azzholes!