Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   1/2: 88 oop (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=555635)

Merlinius 11-27-2007 03:31 PM

1/2: 88 oop
 
No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00/$2.00


CO ($226.96)
Button ($337.55) 54/16/1.0/357(80 hands)
SB ($198.00) (Hero)
BB ($42.83)
MP2 ($563.60)
MP3 ($234.10)

Preflop: Hero is SB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, Button calls $2.00, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to 10.0</font>, <font color="#666666">1 folds</font>, Button calls $9.00,

Flop: 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ( $24 )
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $15.00</font>, Button calls $15.00,

Turn: 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ( $54 )
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets $24.00</font>, Hero calls $24.00,

River: 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ( $102 )
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets $48.00</font>, <font color="#666666">1 folds</font>,

Final Pot: $147.00

Casper05 11-27-2007 03:32 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
bet/fold or check/fold turn

orange 11-27-2007 07:12 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
this seems okay.

Kimpan 11-27-2007 07:17 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
15 seems too small though, make it 18

Jamsym 11-27-2007 07:40 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
Flop bet should be larger. 15 into 24 looks weak and could invite trouble.

As played a would check/fold the turn.

Looks like he just value betting his K rag.

orange 11-27-2007 07:49 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
...why is it necessary to bet larger on the flop? you want more value?

Casper05 11-27-2007 07:50 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
[ QUOTE ]
this seems okay.

[/ QUOTE ]why are you calling the turn (or why aren't you betting it) vs a 54/16/1?

orange 11-27-2007 07:53 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
because they will float with any pair and usually bet it. i think there is more value in letting him bet than us betting ourselves (though betting the turn for value is tempting).

spivey 11-27-2007 07:55 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
I just call preflop because you get in such awful spots against an uberstation. I probably check flop and c/c 2 streets here if he's been semi-aggro (which it looks like he has).

Jamsym 11-27-2007 08:04 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
[ QUOTE ]
...why is it necessary to bet larger on the flop? you want more value?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because betting too small invites trouble. Where he would normally fold when he missed he correctly spots the bet as being weak and then floats us and puts us in tough spots like this one.

StaticVoid 11-27-2007 08:09 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
[ QUOTE ]
54/16/1.0/357 (80 hands)

[/ QUOTE ]

What is the 357?

orange 11-27-2007 08:19 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
...why is it necessary to bet larger on the flop? you want more value?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because betting too small invites trouble. Where he would normally fold when he missed he correctly spots the bet as being weak and then floats us and puts us in tough spots like this one.

[/ QUOTE ]
i think his calling range of $18 = his calling range of $15. this guy isn't folding any pair no matter what we do. also, why are you so intent on him folding? we are certainly ahead of a decent part of his range right? (not saying him folding is bad, but him calling isn't overly terrible i wouldnt think).

Jamsym 11-27-2007 08:48 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
...why is it necessary to bet larger on the flop? you want more value?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because betting too small invites trouble. Where he would normally fold when he missed he correctly spots the bet as being weak and then floats us and puts us in tough spots like this one.

[/ QUOTE ]
i think his calling range of $18 = his calling range of $15. this guy isn't folding any pair no matter what we do. also, why are you so intent on him folding? we are certainly ahead of a decent part of his range right? (not saying him folding is bad, but him calling isn't overly terrible i wouldnt think).

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't expect him to fold a pair.

I just think that if we bet $15 instead of $20 he is more likely to think we are FOS and try to bluff us.

In theory you will say that's good and we should be happy to have him bluffing us but in practice we are OOP with a marginal hand and no idea whether we're snapping off bluffs or getting valuetowned.

jlocdog 11-27-2007 09:58 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
Dave,

Just because he will float often and bet the turn doesn't mean that we will be in a better spot for it. We hate half the deck come turn. By the river we hate most of it. The quicker this hand ends the better. B/f that turn.

kaby 11-27-2007 10:04 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
[ QUOTE ]
bet/fold turn

[/ QUOTE ]

orange 11-27-2007 10:11 PM

Re: 1/2: 88 oop
 
Jam,

I can see your point. I don't necessarily agree with it as I think that relative FE of $16 instead of $18 is fairly close. But you bring good merits to your argument.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.