|
Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...rvel_comic.jpg
[ QUOTE ] A long while back, Moriarty over at Aint-it-Cool News reported that he'd read a script for Jurassic Park 4 written by none other than indy-stalwart John Sayles. Moriarty raved about the film at the time, mentioning a hidden mountain fortress and dinosaurs trained by the military to carry guns. Sounded absolutely butt-****ing crazy, but Moriarty claimed that if the script was done justice, the film would be amazing. [/ QUOTE ] Filmwad Link Let The Picture Editing Begin. Some that i found on another forum (Soundcircuit.com) are here... http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/a...llers_ver1.jpg http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/a...f_violence.jpg http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y15...onparkcopy.jpg http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/a...ii_society.jpg http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/a...Scarface_4.jpg http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/a...ace-1-1024.jpg http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/a...n_the_hood.jpg |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
Why did they ever come out with another one, the first one was a stone cold classic and they should really stop [censored] with it
dinosaurs with guns....give me a break |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
Looks like Snakes on a Plane has some competition for best movie idea ever
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
LOL it sounds awesome TBH.
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
[ QUOTE ]
Why did they ever come out with another one, the first one was a stone cold classic and they should really stop [censored] with it dinosaurs with guns....give me a break [/ QUOTE ] Jurassic Park is not a stone cold classic. It's "good", and it can be argued that III is better because III is just dinosaur greatness and isn't trying to be some diatribe on Chaos Theory and having children and the ethical problems of science. Sequels don't "[censored]" with a movie. Also you missed the point of the OP, which made it fairly clear that this was just an old script tossed around and this will not be what they're filming for the upcoming Jurassic Park IV. |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Why did they ever come out with another one, the first one was a stone cold classic and they should really stop [censored] with it dinosaurs with guns....give me a break [/ QUOTE ] Jurassic Park is not a stone cold classic. It's "good", and it can be argued that III is better because III is just dinosaur greatness and isn't trying to be some diatribe on Chaos Theory and having children and the ethical problems of science. Sequels don't "[censored]" with a movie. Also you missed the point of the OP, which made it fairly clear that this was just an old script tossed around and this will not be what they're filming for the upcoming Jurassic Park IV. [/ QUOTE ] 1. umm, did you read the link? 2. yes jurassic park owns, you're an idiot if you think three was better 3. yes sequels do decrease the value of the original IMO |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Why did they ever come out with another one, the first one was a stone cold classic and they should really stop [censored] with it dinosaurs with guns....give me a break [/ QUOTE ] Jurassic Park is not a stone cold classic. It's "good", and it can be argued that III is better because III is just dinosaur greatness and isn't trying to be some diatribe on Chaos Theory and having children and the ethical problems of science. Sequels don't "[censored]" with a movie. Also you missed the point of the OP, which made it fairly clear that this was just an old script tossed around and this will not be what they're filming for the upcoming Jurassic Park IV. [/ QUOTE ] WTF? I'm not sure about "stone cold classic" but Jurassic Park is an excellent, excellent film. If you think 3 was better, you're almost retarded. I really have no idea how someone could think that 3 was even an above average movie, let alone better than the first. |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
Three is probably the worst piece of crap ever. The first one was f'ing incredible. I'm going to think of a good movie poster to photoshop.
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Why did they ever come out with another one, the first one was a stone cold classic and they should really stop [censored] with it dinosaurs with guns....give me a break [/ QUOTE ] Jurassic Park is not a stone cold classic. It's "good", and it can be argued that III is better because III is just dinosaur greatness and isn't trying to be some diatribe on Chaos Theory and having children and the ethical problems of science. Sequels don't "[censored]" with a movie. Also you missed the point of the OP, which made it fairly clear that this was just an old script tossed around and this will not be what they're filming for the upcoming Jurassic Park IV. [/ QUOTE ] WTF? I'm not sure about "stone cold classic" but Jurassic Park is an excellent, excellent film. If you think 3 was better, you're almost retarded. I really have no idea how someone could think that 3 was even an above average movie, let alone better than the first. [/ QUOTE ] Worm, I stand corrected on the plot, I thought that was done away with long ago. III does exactly what it sets out to do, which is give us a bunch of pretty dinosaurs to look at in intense scenarios, including water and air scenes which hadn't been in the previous movies. The first is pretending to be an actual excellent movie like Jaws, using children and some nonsense moral arguments to trick you into thinking it actually has something to say and isn't just a fun summer movie, and it has a lot of people fooled. I made a post some time ago about people who hate III. It doesn't make any logical sense for somebody who voluntarily saw III to hate it. Why'd you go see the [censored] movie in the first place? What were you expecting? Lost World sucked, so why on earth would you go see III with any expectations other than being entertained by a bunch of CGI and animatronic dinosaurs, which the movie 100% delivers on? In any event, I said a legitimate argument could be made for it, not that I thought it was better. Ebert supports this viewpoint. |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
I thought the made up Godzilla Dinosaur was horrible, the CGI seemed worse then before, the acting was worse (Although i admit it was not Great or anything in one or two), it had no real climactic ending and the story was nearly non existent.
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
[ QUOTE ]
The first is pretending to be an actual excellent movie like Jaws [/ QUOTE ] lol? wtfbbq |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
If its anywhere near as good as I remember dino riders and the toys being from my distant memory it could possibly top Top Gun as the greatest movie of all time.... I can't wait!
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The first is pretending to be an actual excellent movie like Jaws [/ QUOTE ] lol? wtfbbq [/ QUOTE ] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaws_%28film%29 Number 56 on the 2007 AFI Top 100. |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
love it OP
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
I used to be unable to figure out whether I thought jurrasic park was so awesome ebcuae of teh story or the novelty of the FX. but, I decided that it really was a great story when I figured out that nowadays I still love JP 1, and not becuae of the novelty...becuase jp 2 sucked.
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
junt monkey: fair enough, III effects and action were great but i think you're selling the first one short. yes it does try to get across a sort of "messsage" about humans capabilities and bad judgement and i think it "does" get that across well. the premise is silly but don't you think if we could do it we would try and this is just pointing out what might have happened if we had.
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
I think JuntMonkey is probably right, but Jurassic Park is one movie that I can't think logically about. I saw it 14 times in theaters when I was a kid because I love it, and I love it because I saw it 14 times in theaters when I was a kid.
Also, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6etg_fX1Pw |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
[ QUOTE ]
junt monkey: fair enough, III effects and action were great but i think you're selling the first one short. yes it does try to get across a sort of "messsage" about humans capabilities and bad judgement and i think it "does" get that across well. the premise is silly but don't you think if we could do it we would try and this is just pointing out what might have happened if we had. [/ QUOTE ] Oh I don't think the premise itself is silly at all, we'd certainly do it and I'd love to see it happen. III is much more ridiculous than I in terms of premise and plot. |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
The dinosaurs in JP III look a gazillion times worse than they did in the first two, that's reason enough to hate it. I still find it entertaining and will watch it on TV but I went in expecting a bad movie and that's pretty much what it is.
Also, there was no scary element to JP II/III that there was in I. I guess I can partly attribute this to only being 8 or 9 when I first saw Jurassic Park, but the Maintenance Shed scene is very far above anything they did in the most recent two films. |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/a...38/goddino.gif
http://www.streetsandsoul.com/kingdino.jpg http://www.erickstevens.net/jp42.jpg http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/a.../gooddinos.gif http://www.streetsandsoul.com/oswaldino.jpg http://www.erickstevens.net/jp44.jpg http://www.coonery.com/misc/jp4c.jpg *Dead* (Same website) |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
[ QUOTE ]
http://www.streetsandsoul.com/kingdino.jpg [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Why did they ever come out with another one, the first one was a stone cold classic and they should really stop [censored] with it dinosaurs with guns....give me a break [/ QUOTE ] Jurassic Park is not a stone cold classic. It's "good", and it can be argued that III is better because III is just dinosaur greatness and isn't trying to be some diatribe on Chaos Theory and having children and the ethical problems of science. Sequels don't "[censored]" with a movie. Also you missed the point of the OP, which made it fairly clear that this was just an old script tossed around and this will not be what they're filming for the upcoming Jurassic Park IV. [/ QUOTE ] WTF? I'm not sure about "stone cold classic" but Jurassic Park is an excellent, excellent film. If you think 3 was better, you're almost retarded. I really have no idea how someone could think that 3 was even an above average movie, let alone better than the first. [/ QUOTE ] Worm, I stand corrected on the plot, I thought that was done away with long ago. III does exactly what it sets out to do, which is give us a bunch of pretty dinosaurs to look at in intense scenarios, including water and air scenes which hadn't been in the previous movies. The first is pretending to be an actual excellent movie like Jaws, using children and some nonsense moral arguments to trick you into thinking it actually has something to say and isn't just a fun summer movie, and it has a lot of people fooled. I made a post some time ago about people who hate III. It doesn't make any logical sense for somebody who voluntarily saw III to hate it. Why'd you go see the [censored] movie in the first place? What were you expecting? Lost World sucked, so why on earth would you go see III with any expectations other than being entertained by a bunch of CGI and animatronic dinosaurs, which the movie 100% delivers on? In any event, I said a legitimate argument could be made for it, not that I thought it was better. Ebert supports this viewpoint. [/ QUOTE ] 3 isnt terrible but it certainly isn't a great or even good film. the first one was fantastic in terms of direction by SS, set design, and special effects for the time, the acting was top notch too. All the set pieces were great. You can't compare the dino scenes in 3 because half the ones they chose to do in 3 were not POSSIBLE to do in 1 given the technology. Script for one is also way way better than the "lets steal a raptor egg and have them chase us around but then they'll let us go cuz we talk to them with a raptor whistle" in 3. JP can't hold a candle to Jaws but it still one of the best cgi summer tent pole pictures out there. |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
4-high that is incredible.
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
[ QUOTE ]
4-high that is incredible. [/ QUOTE ] The Godfather one is one of the best animated pic I've seen in a long while. ty |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
you mean the scarface one?
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
[ QUOTE ]
you mean the scarface one? [/ QUOTE ] ? you might want to rewatch both movies |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
Whatever anyone thinks of the movies doesn't matter.
Nicely done, 4 High. Some really fine work in this thread. |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Why did they ever come out with another one, the first one was a stone cold classic and they should really stop [censored] with it dinosaurs with guns....give me a break [/ QUOTE ] Jurassic Park is not a stone cold classic. It's "good", and it can be argued that III is better because III is just dinosaur greatness and isn't trying to be some diatribe on Chaos Theory and having children and the ethical problems of science. Sequels don't "[censored]" with a movie. Also you missed the point of the OP, which made it fairly clear that this was just an old script tossed around and this will not be what they're filming for the upcoming Jurassic Park IV. [/ QUOTE ] WTF? I'm not sure about "stone cold classic" but Jurassic Park is an excellent, excellent film. If you think 3 was better, you're almost retarded. I really have no idea how someone could think that 3 was even an above average movie, let alone better than the first. [/ QUOTE ] Worm, I stand corrected on the plot, I thought that was done away with long ago. III does exactly what it sets out to do, which is give us a bunch of pretty dinosaurs to look at in intense scenarios, including water and air scenes which hadn't been in the previous movies. The first is pretending to be an actual excellent movie like Jaws, using children and some nonsense moral arguments to trick you into thinking it actually has something to say and isn't just a fun summer movie, and it has a lot of people fooled. I made a post some time ago about people who hate III. It doesn't make any logical sense for somebody who voluntarily saw III to hate it. Why'd you go see the [censored] movie in the first place? What were you expecting? Lost World sucked, so why on earth would you go see III with any expectations other than being entertained by a bunch of CGI and animatronic dinosaurs, which the movie 100% delivers on? In any event, I said a legitimate argument could be made for it, not that I thought it was better. Ebert supports this viewpoint. [/ QUOTE ] 3 doesn't try to get across a stupid point? Are you kidding? First of all, the sappy family plot was horrible. Secondly, what about the whole disturbing nature [censored]? They steal the raptor egg, they get chased the whole movie, the raptors don't eat them when they give it back. Respek nature, yo. Also, having the trex die was [censored] horrible. |
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
|
Re: Jurrasic Park 4 AKA Dino Riders
Good addition, sj
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.