Official Stars Regulars Thread
couple regs that are good
Bri-c citanul DerekJC9954 F.Savage gskgsad ipokeder Lyric MrTeddyKGB NMcNasty purplEUROs supernova9 TalentedTom Unsyatisfied |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
This is fun!
couple regs that you think are good that are actually terrible bri-c talentedtom couple regs that you think are good that are actually good lyric purpleuros supernova9 unsyatisfied couple regs that you think are good that are actually mediocre and/or nittish citanul derekjc ipokeder mrteddykgb nmcnasty |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
i think derekjc is good
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
sometimes he's good, usually he's mediocre. i will give you that he can be a pain in the ass.
edit: I think he's very similar to MT UR Wallet. Can be annoying, but makes way too many stupid plays. Derek is a bit more aggro preflop which is a bit more annoying, but he isn't aggro in the right spots. If I werent 9-tabling he'd be no problem at all. When I'm playing a lot of tables, it's annoying to have him behind me, though, I agree. |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
TWP forgot to add the top player on stars which would obv. be Alotofaction
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
please delete that post
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
I would classify F.Savage in TWP's 3rd category.
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
I remember unsyatisfied and garompon as being two of the main everyday tagfish at 5/10 when I played there, tho maybe they are better now or playing lower limits.
I agree w/ Lyric and also think Jeetorius is very tough as was gp333 when he played 5/10. Get Loo$e usually owned me but hes busto now anyway [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
garompon still blows (he's actually biggest 5/10 loser in my DB - sweet!) but unsyat is better.
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
This is fun! couple regs that you think are good that are actually terrible bri-c talentedtom couple regs that you think are good that are actually good lyric purpleuros supernova9 unsyatisfied couple regs that you think are good that are actually mediocre and/or nittish citanul derekjc ipokeder mrteddykgb nmcnasty [/ QUOTE ] My opinion: bri-c is tough, derekjc is strong, unsyatisfied is a tag-fish, mrteddykgb is an enormous nit |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
twp who are the top 4 stars regulars at 3/6 (i would have said top 5, but......u kno)
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
I dont really play enough to know. The people who I see winning are unsyatisfied, datrip1, mturwallet, derekjc and ipokeder. The guys i mentioned as being good are all obviously at least one step above these guys but those guys usually play 5/10 or higher and are rarely seen at 3/6. Of these guys, it's hard to say who's the best. I'm not troubled by any of them. Probably MT and Derek are the toughest of these guys. They are both good for 3/6 regs but neither would beat 5/10 for that much although i would not be surprised if they could be winners at 5/10.
edit: bri-c is too nitty. and i hate him because he sat out when a huge deep stacked fish sat out which caused the fish to leave and the table to break instead of the fish likely coming back if the table hadnt broken due to bri-c sitting out. so he's obviously bad just for that reason. he doesnt know how to keep a fish happy. |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
forgot Psier. he's solid. except yesterday i bet into him with the nfd when he was the preflop raiser and he called with AK unimproved. then he bet and called a check/raise push on the ace turn. that's pretty fishy.
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
2/4 regs
People that think they are good but aren't Reefypoopoo Xaston citanul (although he seems to not suck as much as he did like 3 weeks ago) Nits UCIPitcher carinokid cdeez8 poonjockey People I respect/think are decent to good skier_5 TableATM |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
last night i was observing some 3/6 tables because i'm a big loser and also hate studying and i noticed Alotofaction had ~25 buyins spread across 9 tables. he seemed to be making a lot of strange plays though and i saw him bet well less than 1/3 pot a few times, also call a few reraises with what i would think are pretty questionable hands.
is he any good and how the [censored] did he get an average of almost three buyins at each of 9 tables? |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
he was probably stuck 5k on the night. yeah, he's awesome.
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
last night i was observing some 3/6 tables because i'm a big loser and also hate studying and i noticed Alotofaction had ~25 buyins spread across 9 tables. he seemed to be making a lot of strange plays though and i saw him bet well less than 1/3 pot a few times, also call a few reraises with what i would think are pretty questionable hands. is he any good and how the [censored] did he get an average of almost three buyins at each of 9 tables? [/ QUOTE ] He plays long sessions and no he is not good. |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
wow i didnt know some of those guys were nits i've been playingn without PA this will save me a lottt of money lol
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
Thoughts on scdavis0? I think hes amazing.
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
Couple of regs that are spewtard calling stations:
1. wiggs73 [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] 2. ??? Regs that I particularly don't like at my table: 1. unsyatisfied 2. vaesolis 3. Gogol's Nose |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
who can you say talentedtom is terrible?
he beats 3/6 for more than just about anyone. |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
Maybe because he plays like this? Classic fish.
POKERSTARS GAME #8685024399: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($3/$6) - 2007/03/01 - 13:08:01 (ET) Table 'Sapientia IV' 6-max Seat #3 is the button Seat 1: stabia62 ($136.85 in chips) Seat 3: daniele16 ($240.10 in chips) Seat 5: TalentedTom ($880.90 in chips) Seat 6: GogUMagog ($600 in chips) TalentedTom: posts small blind $3 GogUMagog: posts big blind $6 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to GogUMagog [Kc 5s] stabia62: calls $6 daniele16: folds TalentedTom: calls $3 GogUMagog: checks *** FLOP *** [6d 4d 8s] TalentedTom: checks GogUMagog: checks stabia62: checks *** TURN *** [6d 4d 8s] [8c] Loggie joins the table at seat #2 TalentedTom: checks GogUMagog: checks stabia62: checks *** RIVER *** [6d 4d 8s 8c] [Qd] TalentedTom: checks GogUMagog: checks stabia62: checks *** SHOW DOWN *** TalentedTom: shows [Qc 9d] (two pair, Queens and Eights) GogUMagog: mucks hand stabia62: mucks hand stabia62 is sitting out TalentedTom collected $17.10 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $18 | Rake $0.90 Board [6d 4d 8s 8c Qd] Seat 1: stabia62 mucked [9h 5h] Seat 3: daniele16 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 5: TalentedTom (small blind) showed [Qc 9d] and won ($17.10) with two pair, Queens and Eights Seat 6: GogUMagog (big blind) mucked [Kc 5s] |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Regs that I particularly don't like at my table: 1. unsyatisfied 2. vaesolis 3. Gogol's Nose [/ QUOTE ] ONE OF THESE THINGS IS NOT LIKE THE OTHERS when i get back into cash i assume my name will be on here somewhere. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] EDIT: twp wrong hand or what? |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
lucky,
Haha I know, he just aggravates the [censored] out of me for some reason. Take your time getting back into cash please. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
No, right hand. He played this hand terribly.
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
No, right hand. He played this hand terribly. [/ QUOTE ] Clearly |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
whatever. it's obviously not that important. i'm sure other people have played with him a lot more than I have and they will have their own evaluations. I have never found him hard to play against at all, though. i'd much rather sit at a table with 5 TTs over 5 Dereks, 5 MTs or 5 Psiers for sure. If you dont think that missing a value bet on the river in this hand is teribble, fine. I strongly disagree, but whatever. And if you dont think his preflop play is terrible, fine as well, but it is.
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
Any comments on whether I suck or not?
I'm gskgsad. I feel like I'm playing well but I can't win a showdown to save my life. Longterm w$@sd is 53, I'm at 48 over last 25k hands. I'm really starting to actually believe stars is rigged. |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
You're pretty solid. I wouldn't avoid you, but I wouldn't target you either.
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
MAN imagine 5 TWPs.........dangerous table!!!
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
<--------- (2/4) Bad TAG unless tilting: Entropy xx
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
oooh, I got mentioned [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Some regs I think are good DerekJC9544 Psier supernova9 purpleEuros catcher3333 Gogols nose lyric unsastifyed Vick is God someone told me they thought theCleaner was solid and what little I've played with him, I would agree so let's add him too. I'm sure there are more that I'm missing possibly because I havn't played much with them or even just recently. A few people I thought were good at one point, but now I'm not sure: Poonjockey Gerans percussion Some People I think that suck Carinokid DrCaligula farlzz LanderD manub ZekKGB HappyClammy DoctorofDoom I'm sure there are more in every category, but these come to mind. |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
I think unsyatisfied is good when I played with him I did not think he was nitty at all.
Also thoughts on prepsoterous. IMO he's very good. |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
Prep is a pain to play with IMO, but haven't played with him in quite some time.
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
oooh, I got mentioned [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] Some regs I think are good DerekJC9544 Psier supernova9 purpleEuros catcher3333 Gogols nose lyric unsastifyed Vick is God someone told me they thought theCleaner was solid and what little I've played with him, I would agree so let's add him too. I'm sure there are more that I'm missing possibly because I havn't played much with them or even just recently. A few people I thought were good at one point, but now I'm not sure: Poonjockey Gerans percussion Some People I think that suck Carinokid DrCaligula farlzz LanderD manub ZekKGB HappyClammy DoctorofDoom I'm sure there are more in every category, but these come to mind. [/ QUOTE ] I may suck at poker but I own you at flipping. |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
xorbie is the best.
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
prep is a huge pain in the ass.
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
prep is good. but lagtarded and tilts like none other.
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
Gogol's Nose, Gerans seem to be good at 2/4
in my limited 3/6 experience MT UR Wallet seems good, but tends to tilt/make crazy plays after losing a big pot. Haha and Sexy Leslie is good. Krantz/purpleeuros needs to stop 4betting me and is also probably the only player who I actively avoid when picking tables. |
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
gogol's nose is the best name by far
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.