Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Micro Stakes Limit (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   99 overcards to flop (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=513215)

I R BABOON 10-01-2007 03:02 PM

99 overcards to flop
 
MP3 = 75/18/ over 75 hands
CO = 60/0/45

Titan Limit Hold'em, $0.05/$0.10 (Titan HH Converter by Kreatief)

Button ($1.91) (Hero)
SB ($0.86)
BB ($4.57)
MP3 ($3.53)
CO ($1.00)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
MP3 calls, CO calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP3 calls, CO calls,

Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ( 3.7BB )
MP3 checks, <font color="#CC3333">CO bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, MP3 calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, Hero calls, MP3 calls,

Turn: Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ( 8.2BB )
MP3 checks, <font color="#CC3333">CO bets</font>, Hero???

Sushiglutton 10-01-2007 03:04 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
I call. There are still many worse hands he can hold.

BigBadBabar 10-01-2007 04:40 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
i frankly think we're screwed and would fold here. calling down isn't really bad either, but against his stats and the way it's played out, i don't like our chances at all.

Xylocain 10-01-2007 04:44 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
:g:
I would call down from flop raise hoping for a lower pp or a 7. I think folding would be too weak but you will see cool stuff like A2 and 44 pretty often.

sean c 10-01-2007 05:34 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
Baboon,

Your turn bets are wrong. They should be less.

To everyone who likes calling down why is raising not better?

OziBattler 10-01-2007 05:52 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
IR, those stats u gave are preflop...postflop here would be useful. Postflop these guys could be anything from a total maniac to someone who only uses his bet button when he has the immortal nuts...okay so they are probably not at the extremes but still (and Im saying for future hands as well) if youve at least got a postflop aggression factor from PT/PokerOffice then just stick it in your OP

Buzz-cp 10-01-2007 06:03 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
easy calldown, we are getting overlay from MP3.

sean: I don't like raising here because I'm not sure we're best.

Buzz

kerowo 10-01-2007 06:03 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
[ QUOTE ]
Baboon,

Your turn bets are wrong. They should be less.

To everyone who likes calling down why is raising not better?

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you really think you are still ahead on the turn? I like calling down for a read, but this really looks like a straight or a set.

Buzz-cp 10-01-2007 06:05 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
[ QUOTE ]
Baboon,

Your turn bets are wrong. They should be less.

[/ QUOTE ]

It probably looks wrong because the pot size on the flop is in BB, not SB.

sean c 10-01-2007 06:09 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
Buzz, kerowo,

I'm just thinking out loud. I'm not sure whats best. Let me ask it another way: if we are good often enough to call twice and we have the turn overlay of a player likely drawing and we can 100% throw our hand in the muck if either 3-bets why would raising not be better than just blindly calling twice?

sean c 10-01-2007 06:11 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Baboon,

Your turn bets are wrong. They should be less.

[/ QUOTE ]

It probably looks wrong because the pot size on the flop is in BB, not SB.

[/ QUOTE ]

My bad. Thx buzz.

Buzz-cp 10-01-2007 06:16 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
[ QUOTE ]
Buzz, kerowo,

I'm just thinking out loud. I'm not sure whats best. Let me ask it another way: if we are good often enough to call twice and we have the turn overlay of a player likely drawing and we can 100% throw our hand in the muck if either 3-bets why would raising not be better than just blindly calling twice?

[/ QUOTE ]

no problem mate. I'm not so fond of mucking when it appears (although it's not entirely clear to us) that we may be dealing with a maniac. Like ozzi, I think the postflop AF (or even aggression by street) would be helpful here. So I go to my default wa/wb calldown mode. I really hate calling down here, but sometimes I am pleasantly surprised.

Bona 10-01-2007 06:26 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
It doesn't look like we can raise anybody out on the turn. I think we are behind here and if we are we have a problem. No outs against a made straight. 2 outs agains a set. 6 outs (but we don't know which ones) against 2 pr.

I don't think a turn fold would be a mistake here. But if we call we have to call the river as well,I think,and I hate our implied odds if we do happen to be ahead.

THIS IS A QUESTION FOR ALL- NOT AN ANSWER:

Assuming typical opponent, not a maniac etc. What if we default cap (the flop) planning to fold to a turn donk or check the turn through? Will we, on average, save enough to see showdown profitably in these situations (when villain doesn't donk) or do we need to keep the pressure on for some other reson?

Point Blank 10-01-2007 07:55 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
do you think this guy would play

88, 77, 66 like this ... or A5?, or a 78, A6 (well - basically a GS or OESD)??

if so ... well - then it's a little harder to fold

but a donk and 3bet after another guy cold calls two is pretty strong ... don't feel bad about folding

I R BABOON 10-02-2007 04:08 AM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
aggression numbers flop/turn/river/total:
MP3=1.53/1.79/1.08/0.86
CO=1.83/1.60/2.00/0.54

BigBadBabar 10-02-2007 01:15 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
sean - there's a flaw with your rationale regarding a 3bet especially given the ranges you assigned to the villains.

Point Blank 10-02-2007 01:59 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
[ QUOTE ]
aggression numbers flop/turn/river/total:
MP3=1.53/1.79/1.08/0.86
CO=1.83/1.60/2.00/0.54

[/ QUOTE ]

IR ... don't pay too much attention to those stats over such a small sample size
keep them in mind ... but try to pay attention to what is make those stat

sean c 10-02-2007 02:07 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
BBB,

You mean a raise not a 3-bet. Like I said earlier in the post I'm not saying its right I was just thinking out loud. I have spent some time thinking about this and plan on stoving it tonight but I think there are a few important factors involved in what the correct turn action should be. Our equity vs both players ranges, the value of the overlay of MP3 and our river plan(if I just call here there are alot of river cards I'm folding to especially not closing the action).

If you see a flaw in my rationale feel free to show me.

BigBadBabar 10-02-2007 02:22 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
good catch, yes raise not 3bet

is this a free showdown raise or are you firing the river again if you just get called on the turn? if you're willing to invest 2 more bets at least then why not call turn, see river, giving us a chance to hit our 2 outer?

sean c 10-02-2007 03:07 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
I'm not sure if we have a 2 outer. There are not a whole lot of river cards I can imagine v-betting here but I wasn't thinking free showdown raise which means its may be best to just fold the turn and probably makes raising retarded. My point was if you were going to blindly call the turn and river would it be better to raise and gain the overlay from the drawing MP3. I don't know thats why I'm going to spend some time on this tonight. I mainly threw it out there to see if someone could blast holes in my thinking before I go through the exercise. Very interesting hand IMO.

Buzz-cp 10-02-2007 04:39 PM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
[ QUOTE ]
aggression numbers flop/turn/river/total:
MP3=1.53/1.79/1.08/0.86
CO=1.83/1.60/2.00/0.54

[/ QUOTE ]

these numbers don't look right to me
I don't have PT in front of me ATM, but it seems to me that total aggression should at least look like be in the middle of the values of aggression by street.

Buzz

I R BABOON 10-03-2007 08:35 AM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
aggression numbers flop/turn/river/total:
MP3=1.53/1.79/1.08/0.86
CO=1.83/1.60/2.00/0.54

[/ QUOTE ]

these numbers don't look right to me
I don't have PT in front of me ATM, but it seems to me that total aggression should at least look like be in the middle of the values of aggression by street.

Buzz

[/ QUOTE ]
http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/9...tatsyw6.th.jpg

Maybe I'm doing something wrong with looking it up (I'm fairly new to PT), but this is what I get after selecting the player in question in the player list and then go to the general info tab.

KaatzMeow 10-03-2007 09:39 AM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
Baboon, on the General Info tab click More Detail and then unclick the includ Pre-flop AF. You have included pre-flop agression into the total AF I think.

I R BABOON 10-03-2007 10:18 AM

Re: 99 overcards to flop
 
Ah I guess that was it then. total aggression after unchecking that option is:
MP3: 1.49
CO: 1.79


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.