Re: I Worry About Some Of You
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I dont understand a single word of this post.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: I Worry About Some Of You
 

[ QUOTE ]
David--

I'm rather surprised that you expected a significant part of the subset of readers who didn't understand your first post to understand this one. Indeed, if your instincts for redundancy are like this in general, I doubt you're much good at backgammon.

--Nate

[/ QUOTE ]

nice 2100th post imo

Re: I Worry About Some Of You
 

Fundamental Theory of Backgammon:
play against cheating backgammon players. it is +EV

Re: I Worry About Some Of You
 

[ QUOTE ]
Dear Dave,

It is my duty to inform you that a crazy person has gained access to your brain and is writing gibberish.

Sincerely,
VP$IP

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: I Worry About Some Of You
 

David Sklansky, the problem with you is not your head. It is how you use it.

Try to broaden your view and you will se that your roll as an famous poker writer and personality have a dimension which I doubt you are aware of. If you have been aware of that, you should not have been “forced” to start 22 new threads in this issue to try to justify your first statement, which of course was an nihilistic error.

Re: I Worry About Some Of You
 

nice trolling dave, but next time u want to pick a fight do it in smp.

Re: I Worry About Some Of You
 

Mr. Sklansky,

(This is one of the 5 serious posts on this thread, so please read)

I have understood what you have been saying in your posts since your first one on this issue, so I don't apply to that 2nd group.
You also believe that an Absolute Poker "boycott" is "probably futile" (atleast it's a lighter stance than you took a few posts ago), and you're right, it probably is. I am not even going to argue about the whole pragmatism vs. morality issue, as it doesn't matter here. Because regardless of your thoughts on a "boycott" and how improbable it may be, what has gone overlooked by most people on these forums is that you have already agreed to take up this cause .

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"I would be all for a probably futile effort to put them out of business if it was clear they have retained their thieves."

[/ QUOTE ]

It's abundantly clear that they have done just that.

Had they not, you can bet we would have heard about the arrests and prosecutions shouted from the rooftops of Costa Rica. Did Barings allow Nick Leeson to chill on a Panama beach and still get paid?

Instead, AP continues to protect, cover and lie for the perpetrators. It has officially named and shamed NOBODY in any of its garbage statements regarding the scandal, except when claiming Scott Tom hasn't been involved with AP for over a year (a proven lie).

Now you know, I hope you will stand by your statement and help to drive these cheating scumbags out of poker forever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course I do.
(You then go off on tangents that would take up too much space and have nothing to do with this.)

[/ QUOTE ]


The words are there, Mr. Sklansky. You typed them, now live up to them. Your posts so far haven't been pro-AP, they have been, in fact, anti-AP, yet the problem is you can be doing so much more to force Absolute Poker out of business. You can start by using some of your many connections in the poker world to try to get something done here.

Sincerely,
PoorSkillz

Re: I Worry About Some Of You
 

hi guys. im in red so i just keep posting new threads about the old thread instead of keeping everything together in one trainwreck thread.


im starting to feel like sklanky is the 50+ yr old version of kolo

Re: I Worry About Some Of You
 

TYO!

Re: I Worry About Some Of You
 

I'm going to venture a guess and say that most people that said things like that were just flaming for attention, and i highly doubt anyone truly believes that absolute liked your post or that you were in on the take.