Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   Absolute Regulars Thread (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=420370)

TheHip41 06-16-2007 09:12 PM

Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
The rake is so brutal at these limits. I think it is hard for even the best players to have a sustainable good BB/100. Not sure if this is a valid way to look at rake BB/100, but I looked in the summary tab of PT and looked at the overall BB/100 for all players. To me this would seem to be the amount of $$ the house has taken. Well, using this method I get 3.23 BB/100 at 3/6 and 2.87 BB/100 at 5/10. That's pretty tough to overcome.

[/ QUOTE ]

between all the bonus and rakeback, i get at least 1.5bb/100 at 5-10 back. so it's not so bad.

Palomino 06-16-2007 11:21 PM

Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
 
This is true, and also this is why I stated that I'm not actually concerned with my PT BB/100. I just care about my bottom line and how much $$ I'm taking home with all the benefits. It does suck when I have a month where my PT shows me in the red, but that doesn't mean that I didn't make more money playing poker than I would have if I had a 'real' job.

TheHip41 06-16-2007 11:42 PM

Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
This is true, and also this is why I stated that I'm not actually concerned with my PT BB/100. I just care about my bottom line and how much $$ I'm taking home with all the benefits. It does suck when I have a month where my PT shows me in the red, but that doesn't mean that I didn't make more money playing poker than I would have if I had a 'real' job.

[/ QUOTE ]

I went on a 660BB slide over 50K hands. Between 3-6 and 5-10. Over the three months this happened, I had three winning months with rakeback and bonuses. That's enough to convince me it's worth it to play.

Abbaddabba 06-17-2007 05:17 AM

Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
 
He said he's rapunzel(sp?) for whoever wanted to know.

...

and he runs 17/11/0.93 after 105 hands in my database. :O

Palomino 06-17-2007 12:19 PM

Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
 
Wow, you been playing him in ring games? I have him tight, but not THAT tight.

TheScientist 06-17-2007 12:41 PM

Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
 
I have a 10k sample on rapunzel and he is nowhere near that tight. Winning in my database too, which is rare.

Scary_Tiger 06-17-2007 01:03 PM

Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
 
So who is JESSMPG?

swollyourroll 06-17-2007 01:37 PM

Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
 
Rapunzel41 - gravy legs sucks too. good example of a 36/24 player that is bad.

Joke Right?

I like when losing players think winning players are bad. Makes me feel goooood! NH GG USUK

Oink 06-17-2007 01:51 PM

Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
Rapunzel41 - gravy legs sucks too. good example of a 36/24 player that is bad.

Joke Right?

I like when losing players think winning players are bad. Makes me feel goooood! NH GG USUK

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL!

Oink 06-18-2007 01:26 PM

Re: Absolute Regulars Thread
 
Anyone know if YUMMYMOMMY69 is 2p2?

Also, Portensia from BATH is Wearethefall with a new sn/account?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.