Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/23 - $50K Horse - Parts 3 and 4)
 

hmmmm

Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/23 - $50K Horse - Parts 3 and 4)
 

The final table of this year's HORSE event kept with the HORSE format, unlike in 2006 when they went to a NL holdem final table.

Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/23 - $50K Horse - Parts 3 and 4)
 

I'm Sorry, my fault.

Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/23 - $50K Horse - Parts 3 and 4)
 

Quads over quads was ridiculous. At first I thought that Singer was being kind of silly saying "maybe I should have folded", but on that flop, if your opponent is playing like he has something, KK is really the only option isn't it?

I was rooting for Gabe too, but he was getting himself in a lot of bad situations...that Stud8 hand vs. Barry where he was drawing to a 7 low vs two players was pretty bad considering how strong Barry was playing. Most people who play a lot of Stud8 know that it's a really bad situation - drawing to win half when you could be drawing completely dead. Hard to figure you've got good odds on that...

Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/23 - $50K Horse - Parts 3 and 4)
 

what was the ratio of online pros to B&M pros in this tourney?

Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/23 - $50K Horse - Parts 3 and 4)
 

[ QUOTE ]
what was the ratio of online pros to B&M pros in this tourney?

[/ QUOTE ]

this looks like a complete list of entrants: http://www.pokernews.com/live-report...p-counts/day1/

Seems as if there were very few online pros although I don't recognize all the names. I think CTS staked foxwoodsfiend IIRC. Darrell Dicken and ZeeJustin I guess are online pros (or at least players known for playing online).

Re: WSOP on ESPN thread (10/23 - $50K Horse - Parts 3 and 4)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So is the final table all NLHE, or do they keep playing horse?

[/ QUOTE ]

it's all NLHE.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wrong