Re: Awesome [not the typical schneids hand]
 

oops i forgot.. +good and

Re: Awesome [not the typical schneids hand]
 

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah Bryce my thought process was "it feels like he has ace high, a checkraise can't hurt any, lets see if I can get the whole pot instead of half of it." //End thought process.

[/ QUOTE ]

(1) How did it feel like he had A high (b/c it looks like he could have a pair here based only on betting patterns)?

(2) Which was a worse play, betting the JT on the river or calling the raise? Or were both plays OK?

Re: Awesome [not the typical schneids hand]
 

The bet was worse by far. No value in it.

-DeathDonkey

Re: Awesome [not the typical schneids hand]
 

[ QUOTE ]
AT, AJ, AQ are the only no pair aces with kickers that p lay...

[/ QUOTE ]

A8=AK866
A9=AK966 etc. all > AK664 (A2)

yadda yadda...

anyways, if anybody thinks i compose those thoughts while at the table, you are all crazy. if that was me in that hand id have a) c'red the flop for value, b) called down, or c) donk the flop, check call down, or d) donk flop, bet/call turn and check/decide river....whichever i felt like doing (aka, flippage of multisided coin [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] )

but IT'S BBV, less talky, more >55bb swingies!

Barron

Re: Awesome [not the typical schneids hand]
 

the bet was worse, no value like death said

Re: Awesome [not the typical schneids hand]
 

does anyone have that pic of the monkeys throwing poop @ ea other?