Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   MTT Community (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=63)
-   -   *Official* WCOOP Event #5 530 NL Holdem (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=502369)

AntonHeat 09-17-2007 12:58 PM

Re: *Official* WCOOP Event #5 530 NL Holdem
 
20 [censored] hrs wow ! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Silent A 09-17-2007 12:59 PM

Re: *Official* WCOOP Event #5 530 NL Holdem
 
[ QUOTE ]
taktloss47: Mr. Lee Jones, I just heard that the chipcount calculations were incorrect
hugh?

[/ QUOTE ]

Unless he's quibbling about the fact that $150,000 is less than 5% of $3,012,500 ... it wasn't

Kristian 09-17-2007 12:59 PM

Re: *Official* WCOOP Event #5 530 NL Holdem
 
FINISH THIS HU SO I CAN GET ON WITH MY LIFE PLS OK THX!!!

Proteus 09-17-2007 01:02 PM

Re: *Official* WCOOP Event #5 530 NL Holdem
 
[ QUOTE ]
taktloss47: Mr. Lee Jones, I just heard that the chipcount calculations were incorrect
hugh?

[/ QUOTE ]

It was 433K + 225K = 658K left in the prize pool.
They had to leave 150K to the winner, and each get 225K (2nd prize) = 58K left.
The chipcount was 24-36 so takt shold get 225K + 0,60 * 58K =260K
and AB should get 225 + 0,40 * 58K = 248K

Sorry my bad English

Hardgrove 09-17-2007 01:03 PM

Re: *Official* WCOOP Event #5 530 NL Holdem
 
Oh this brings back memories from one drunken split-session in Vegas this summer:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...ue#Post11204962

GOGOGOGOGO AB!!!!

Kristian 09-17-2007 01:04 PM

Re: *Official* WCOOP Event #5 530 NL Holdem
 
I read a debate concerning whether the 5% was supposed to be of the total prize pool, or of the prize pool remaining between the two players. Lee Jones thinks it is of the total prize pool. Personally, I don't think it makes much sense to prevent players from making a substantial HU deal.

Ontario_Tory 09-17-2007 01:05 PM

Re: *Official* WCOOP Event #5 530 NL Holdem
 
[ QUOTE ]
I read a debate concerning whether the 5% was supposed to be of the total prize pool, or of the prize pool remaining between the two players. Lee Jones thinks it is of the total prize pool. Personally, I don't think it makes much sense to prevent players from making a substantial HU deal.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think there's anything to prevent them from making a substantial HU deal, just that PS won't facilitate / enforce it.

edit: & the tourney lobby states "Any final table deal must leave at least 5% of the prize pool on the table". I read that to be the entire prize pool...


Dunkman 09-17-2007 01:05 PM

Re: *Official* WCOOP Event #5 530 NL Holdem
 
[ QUOTE ]
5th all-in. Twice takt was way ahead, the other times he was drawing live. Can't win.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess when you've got 260k locked up you can't complain about running bad, but damn I'd be pissed if I was tak.

sc000t 09-17-2007 01:08 PM

Re: *Official* WCOOP Event #5 530 NL Holdem
 
[ QUOTE ]
Lee Jones [Support]: Hi takt - we've reviewed the numbers. They're absolutely correct. You get $260,184.82 , illusive gets $248,648.93. You're racing for $150K exactly.

[/ QUOTE ]


Anyone else think they should change the 5% rule about chopping?

tozzy 09-17-2007 01:09 PM

Re: *Official* WCOOP Event #5 530 NL Holdem
 
jebus, 33?!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.