Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Why isnt DN playing any hands? Does he think he'll win more money if he plays really tight?

[/ QUOTE ]Lose less at the very least... Seems like he was playing a perfectly reasonable style, maybe a little card dead or just didn't have any good hands for the show.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)
 

What's going on with Negreanu? The first couple seasons he played virtually half the hands and now he's playing nothing. Bankroll problems?

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)
 

I can't stand Gaime Jold.

I wish HSP would just cut him out of the program.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)
 

I think maybe Daniel has become more concerned with winning than playing every hand, making crying calls etc. This table is extremely loose, so maybe Daniel is right in tightening up.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)
 

DN IS A NIT LDO

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)
 

[ QUOTE ]
I can't stand Lamie Gold.

I wish HSP would just cut him into pieces.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)
 

wow... if jamie gold had checked J's full of aces like harman did all you 2p2 nits would be all over him. it was the safe play so congrats to you jen for making the safe play.

it's amazing what you p2prs rage about and the things that you totally miss.

when jen says she's been card dead that's ridiculous. she's only playing the top 2% of starting hands anyway.

ridiculous.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)
 

Is durrrrr old enough yet?

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)
 

Horrible episode. I'm seriously considering stopping watching altogether until the 500k table w/ Greenstein, PA, Esfandiari, etc.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/15)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Im tired of this table.

I would need stack sizes, but I'm pretty sure Jeniffer's JJ hand on paper was bad, but I think it was Jamie's speech that did it, and I have no prob with a player of her caliber going with her read despite good odds (it should also be noted that her read was good in a sense, it was clear that in Jamie's mind he had the nuts and really wanted her to call).




[/ QUOTE ]

do you notice how often on message boards discussing her play that we all give harman excuses that answer away the fact that she's simply a nit!

there needs to be a flashing sign above her opponent reading... YOU HAVE HIM BEAT JEN .. IT'S OK TO BET. before she even touches her chips.

she is the one at the table that is totally useless. it would be different if she was at least interesting. she is boring.. her play is boring. her table presence is uber boring.