Re: paging Lee Jones - softplaying
 

Other operators, whether internet or B&M, would say "we do this because it's the way the rule's always been, and we won't change it."

Stars says "we do this because it's the way the rule's always been, and we need to think it through."

Whatever the result, this is a huge differential in thought process and one for which Stars deserves a great deal of praise.

Re: paging Lee Jones - softplaying
 

Lee,
If you can't detect softplaying, how can you detect much worse, subtler forms of collusion that are against your rules?

Re: paging Lee Jones
 

[ QUOTE ]
I also have to say I'm disappointed @ elky, I've known him since back when he was starcraft pro and always thought he had straight ethics.

[/ QUOTE ]He still has straight ehtics. Do you know why? BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH IT AND IT'S PERFECTLY LEGAL!

Re: paging Lee Jones - softplaying
 

[ QUOTE ]
Lee,
If you can't detect softplaying, how can you detect much worse, subtler forms of collusion that are against your rules?

[/ QUOTE ]Give it a rest.
If you can't even answer this question yourself, then I think anyone who explains it to you will just be wasting their time.

Re: paging Lee Jones - softplaying
 

so Lee, Is it okay if we agree to "hard" play each other and go nuts everytime we are in a hand with the person we are in agreement and benefit from the crazy image from the rest of the table?

Re: paging Lee Jones - softplaying
 

Twin & H@LL rule PS...

Re: paging Lee Jones - softplaying
 

[ QUOTE ]
Twin & H@LL rule PS...

[/ QUOTE ]
Did you just bump a nearly year old thread to say that?