Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 

Sound advice

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 

[ QUOTE ]
People keep saying that this is brag. Is that winrate really good? what does your average 2+2 100nl run at?

[/ QUOTE ]
This has been discussed to death. But the answer I believe is that the average 2p2er has a negative winrate.

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 

Is that a fact? Are we counting the lurkers or only the active members?

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 

looks good. good thing you are dirty or no one would be able to tell us apart!

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 

[ QUOTE ]
brag. heater.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, this is so not a heater

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 

[ QUOTE ]
looks good. good thing you are dirty or no one would be able to tell us apart!

[/ QUOTE ]

Haha nice to see other lobsters here. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
try the software forum for software to make it easier to multitable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why not just name the software that he should look into?

[/ QUOTE ]

'cause there's a variety of software options that might work for him, depending on his needs/sites/etc.

i'm fairly confident that OP is an intelligent person, so he should be able to figure it out for himself.

[/ QUOTE ]

Josem what would be your "Must Have for MTers Software List" for Tilt and or Stars players(NL6max obv)

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 

[ QUOTE ]
Josem what would be your "Must Have for MTers Software List" for Tilt and or Stars players(NL6max obv)

[/ QUOTE ]
No idea.

I play at party - I use PT, PAHUD, MTH and holdem manager.


When I play Stars SNGs (the only format I play there) I use the betpot script, but that seems to not work at the moment for me. If I cared, I'd look at the latest version and fix it.

Re: 50k hands of NL100 - stat check
 

[ QUOTE ]
Is that a fact? Are we counting the lurkers or only the active members?

[/ QUOTE ]

It is not a provable "fact" that average 2p2 player at 100nl is a losing player.

1) it depends how you define the group of players you're considering

2) it depends how you define losing player

3) most importantly, it doesn't really matter. something in the order of 5bb/100 would be good.