Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 

well if mods decide it is too much effort or doesnt really care to find out who's gimmick is who's then mods may just ban them out of principle....I mean look what happened to Beanz, a gimmick with so much potential that got shot down in his/her prime. lolz.

furthermore, it would be such a shame for someones real account to get banned if Wook or I were to make a blatant mistake and get you confused with a gimmick [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] <font color="white"> oh noes! What have a started....? </font>

btw knockon, your would be supereasy to spot, ducy?

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 

[ QUOTE ]
From a game theory perspective this is a great way to get a bunch of gimick accounts to show up.

[/ QUOTE ]

in order of likelihood:

1. bravos1
2. bravos1
3. bravos1
4. unterfish
5. xylocain
6. bravos1

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 

Why do I play this game? I'm so sick of red numbers in my Excel file.

Something about FTP tilts me, but I'm not sure what. Can't wait til I clear my $50 in [unmentionable] and then I'm done there for the most part. I should have sold the last part to Eric or Art or somebody. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 

[ QUOTE ]
You know that sticky that mentions vB? It's right there early in the post. Early Nov.

[/ QUOTE ]

Damn, I actually had read that sticky and read right over that.

Sometimes, I think I'm losing my fricking mind.

Thanks for putting up with a dumbass question.

Doc

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You know that sticky that mentions vB? It's right there early in the post. Early Nov.

[/ QUOTE ]

Damn, I actually had read that sticky and read right over that.

Sometimes, I think I'm losing my fricking mind.

Thanks for putting up with a dumbass question.

Doc

[/ QUOTE ]

We [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] dumbass questions.

[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 

like glad wrap [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
From a game theory perspective this is a great way to get a bunch of gimick accounts to show up.

[/ QUOTE ]

in order of likelihood:

1. bravos1
2. bravos1
3. bravos1
4. unterfish
5. xylocain
6. bravos1

[/ QUOTE ]

Although I think Nash is a great gimmick.. he is not mine, but if I were not me, I'd agree w/ your list.. well except I wouldn't put unterfish on this one.

My list:

Buzz
Boz
BBB
Tyler
Wookie (except he is sleeping)
Ozi [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] (BAN! if true LDO)
Gib &lt;-- dark horse!

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Paying $50 for someone to write my paper due tomorrow. Eh eh?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not going to be any easier by posting on 2+2. Here, let me help...

[/ QUOTE ]

You have been banned at the The 2+2 Forums.
Reason: Banned until you finish your paper.
Ban duration: 12 hours.

[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] I finished at 9am

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 

Does the new forumware allow for sufficiently advanced banning or are a lot of the fun going away with the new software?

Re: Less Hugs, More Bans (NC Thread)
 

Finally having some winning sessions again!

Favorite hand of the night: UTG straddles, I 3bet with black 99, MP caps, straddler and I call. Flop: 983 2 diamonds, checked around (d'oh!). Turn Ad. UTG checks, I check, MP bets, UTG calls, I raise and MP insta-3bets. His quickness means he has a set or flush more than AK sadly so I just call. River random diamond. I bet and he folds AA face up. lol B&amp;Maments.