Re: top 2 150 deep against nittish player
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah I run at around 21/18 and KTs is an autoraise for me UTG, and I've run a nittier than 17/13 over a few hundred hands on one table several times before.

[/ QUOTE ]
Now take "several times" and compare it to how often you've not run nittier than 17/13. Point being we can't rule out KT but we can discount it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Several times is an understatement. I'd say that I run at around 17/13 on a certain table a couple times a session. So no, we cannot discount KT.

[/ QUOTE ]
Discount = making less likely. Yes, we can. I'm not going to calculate how often you'll run 17/13 or less over 200 hands, but it's def less than 20%.

Re: top 2 150 deep against nittish player
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah I run at around 21/18 and KTs is an autoraise for me UTG, and I've run a nittier than 17/13 over a few hundred hands on one table several times before.

[/ QUOTE ]
Now take "several times" and compare it to how often you've not run nittier than 17/13. Point being we can't rule out KT but we can discount it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Several times is an understatement. I'd say that I run at around 17/13 on a certain table a couple times a session. So no, we cannot discount KT.

[/ QUOTE ]
Discount = making less likely. Yes, we can. I'm not going to calculate how often you'll run 17/13 or less over 200 hands, but it's def less than 20%.

[/ QUOTE ]

You don't have to add every combo of KTs. If you're using pokerstove only use one or two suits to weight it more accurately. Taking it out altogether is silly.

Re: top 2 150 deep against nittish player
 

[ QUOTE ]
You don't have to add every combo of KTs. If you're using pokerstove only use one or two suits to weight it more accurately. Taking it out altogether is silly.


[/ QUOTE ]
Agreed. Never said we should take it out altogether...