Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   The New Official FTP Regulars Thread (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=479460)

DMoogle 08-19-2007 12:41 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
I'm DMoogle on FTP. I haven't been playing much this month, partly because I was on vacation for the past week and a half, but if there's anyone here who's played much with me, I'd like to hear what you think about my play.

willw9 08-19-2007 12:44 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm DMoogle on FTP. I haven't been playing much this month, partly because I was on vacation for the past week and a half, but if there's anyone here who's played much with me, I'd like to hear what you think about my play.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ditto, 'cept I'm willw9 ldo.

Oki-Oki 08-19-2007 12:55 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
by the way, i learned that 2127serb is actually twin-caracas (or however you spell it)

apparently he went busto at nosebleeds and is trying to rebuild down here

[/ QUOTE ]

There is a 2127serb and a serb2127, played 2127serb HU at 2/4. Beat me out of a buyin and then I quit. He struck me as very very good.

G_Dollaz 08-19-2007 01:21 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
Oh and another thing, just to piss you msnl regs off just a lil more. Kurosh is up more in last 3 months then anyone else mentioned in this thread according to my DB...

[/ QUOTE ]

Has Kurosh been playing 100bb deep since I moved to stars or is he still shortstacking?

Also, fwiw I remember EGADZ being one of the best reg's when I was on FT (someone asked about him), and Tao, you also struck me as one of the better reg's. HEK was solid (despite me running like God against him for about 2 months straight), but from what I hear he moved up. Those are about the only people that I remember sticking out in my mind @ the 2/4. I was Toine_baby by the way....

samh133 08-19-2007 01:34 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
also, this has bothered me a few times.

josh336 please stop sitting at tables and instasitting out and sitting there till it boots you. i dont see you do this at 5/10 very much but ALL the time at 10/20. please either play or leave.

thanks.

[/ QUOTE ]

DaAznFella 08-19-2007 01:49 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
azn fella sooooo bad always has the nuts whenever he raises, autofold

David1234 08-19-2007 02:07 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
doom switch plays good in my limited experience with him

DJ Sensei 08-19-2007 03:41 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
I'm thinking about datamining some levels of FTP and then analyzing the play of some particularly regular shorstacks, presumably to release my results publicly. If we beat the hell out of them, maybe they'll stop playing so much and making the games crappier (or at least drop to lower levels so we dont care about them anymore). Any thoughts on that idea; whether its awesome or meh, ethically fine or douchey?

AAismyfriend 08-19-2007 05:47 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
lol blackjacksucks.....

Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $3/$6 Blinds - 4 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

Hero (SB): $613.65
BB: $296.35
UTG: $753.85
BTN: $591.00

Preflop: Hero is dealt T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (4 Players)
2 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $18.00</font>, BB calls $12.00

Flop: ($36) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $26.00</font>, BB calls $26.00

Turn: ($88) 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, <font color="red">BB bets $48.00</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $232.00</font>, BB calls $184.00

River: ($552) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $168.00</font>, BB calls all-in for $20.35
Uncalled bet of $147.65 returned to Hero
Uncalled bet of $0.00 returned to BB

Pot Size: $592.70 ($2 Rake)

BB had 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (a flush, Ace high) and LOST (-$296.35)
Hero had T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (a flush, Ace high) and WON (+$294.35)

tcorbin16 08-19-2007 05:58 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
oops

Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $5/$10 Blinds - 5 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $600.80
blackjacksucks (BB): $444.75
Hero (UTG): $1,000.00
CO: $1,399.35
BTN: $985.00

Preflop: Hero is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (5 Players)
<font color="red">Hero raises to $35.00</font>, 3 folds, blackjacksucks calls $25.00

Flop: ($75) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
blackjacksucks checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $55.00</font>, blackjacksucks calls $55.00

Turn: ($185) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
blackjacksucks checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $135.00</font>, blackjacksucks calls $135.00

River: ($455) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">blackjacksucks bets all-in for $219.75</font>, Hero calls $219.75

Pot Size: $894.50 ($3 Rake)

blackjacksucks had 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (three of a kind, Sixes) and WON (+$446.75)
Hero had A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (two pair, Jacks and Sixes) and LOST (-$444.75)

bigbabyjesus 08-19-2007 07:47 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
oops

Full Tilt Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $5/$10 Blinds - 5 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $600.80
blackjacksucks (BB): $444.75
Hero (UTG): $1,000.00
CO: $1,399.35
BTN: $985.00

Preflop: Hero is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (5 Players)
<font color="red">Hero raises to $35.00</font>, 3 folds, blackjacksucks calls $25.00

Flop: ($75) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
blackjacksucks checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $55.00</font>, blackjacksucks calls $55.00

Turn: ($185) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
blackjacksucks checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $135.00</font>, blackjacksucks calls $135.00

River: ($455) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">blackjacksucks bets all-in for $219.75</font>, Hero calls $219.75

Pot Size: $894.50 ($3 Rake)

blackjacksucks had 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (three of a kind, Sixes) and WON (+$446.75)
Hero had A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (two pair, Jacks and Sixes) and LOST (-$444.75)

[/ QUOTE ]

I ask myself alot, where do people like blackjacksucks get their money? this guy is constantly absolutely terrible. he might but in for 30bb's or whatever but he donks it off soooooooooo bad consistently i just dont know how he continues.

* i just checked his pokerdb, and he has $750 in cashes.

bigbabyjesus 08-19-2007 07:51 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm thinking about datamining some levels of FTP and then analyzing the play of some particularly regular shorstacks, presumably to release my results publicly. If we beat the hell out of them, maybe they'll stop playing so much and making the games crappier (or at least drop to lower levels so we dont care about them anymore). Any thoughts on that idea; whether its awesome or meh, ethically fine or douchey?

[/ QUOTE ]

ethically, its fine, i think for obvious reasons. we're all in the business to make money (fairly), and understanding an outlier's strategy and sharing it with others is just part of the game.

but i don't think it's worth your time. there was a solid shortstack thread by luego not that long ago where very correct strategies vs these guys where discussed (aka, stop calling them so light!.)

they are super annoying when they are at a table, especially when they have position on you. but they're not THAt prevalent; i would say about 25% of the time i play there is a smart shortstacker at the table.

tuckercat 08-19-2007 08:10 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
i love blackjacksucks!

the hand converter is messed and doing weird things, it won't convert what the final result was... first hand, blackjack had AQ off...second hand he had KJ. i've got like a million more banana hands with him. i love blackjacksucks!


Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Hold'em Cash Game
$3/$6 Blinds
6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

Hero (SB): $669.90
BB: $595.20
UTG: $224.80
MP: $603.75
CO: $605.20
BTN: $1,148.30

Preflop: Hero is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (6 Players)
UTG raises to $21.00, MP folds, CO folds, BTN folds, Hero calls $18.00, BB folds

Flop: ($48) 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
UTG checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($48) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
UTG bets $51.00, Hero calls $51.00

River: ($150) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
UTG bets all-in for $152.80, Hero calls $152.80

Pot Size: $455.60 ($3 Rake)

Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Hold'em Cash Game
$3/$6 Blinds
6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $684.00
Hero (BB): $1303.00
UTG: $120.00
MP: $325.10
CO: $870.50
BTN: $1,627.85

Preflop: Hero is dealt 10[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 10[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (6 Players)
UTG folds, blackjacksucks raises to $21.00, CO folds, BTN folds, SB folds, Hero raises to $60.00, blackjacksucks calls $39.00

Flop: ($129) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img](2 Players)
HERO bets $70.00, blackjacksucks raises all-in to $265.10, HERO calls $195.10

Turn: ($659.20) A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

River: ($659.20) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

Pot Size: $659.20 ($3 Rake)

bigbabyjesus 08-19-2007 08:14 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
i love blackjacksucks!

Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Hold'em Cash Game
$3/$6 Blinds
6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

Hero (SB): $669.90
BB: $595.20
UTG: $224.80
MP: $603.75
CO: $605.20
BTN: $1,148.30

Preflop: Hero is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (6 Players)
UTG raises to $21.00, MP folds, CO folds, BTN folds, Hero calls $21.00, BB folds
Uncalled bet of $3.00 returned to Hero

Flop: ($48) 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
UTG checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($48) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
UTG bets $51.00, Hero calls $51.00

River: ($150) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
UTG bets all-in for $152.80, Hero calls $152.80

Pot Size: $455.60 ($3 Rake)

[/ QUOTE ]

How you played this hand is vomit-inducing.

tagtastic 08-19-2007 12:04 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm thinking about datamining some levels of FTP and then analyzing the play of some particularly regular shorstacks, presumably to release my results publicly. If we beat the hell out of them, maybe they'll stop playing so much and making the games crappier (or at least drop to lower levels so we dont care about them anymore). Any thoughts on that idea; whether its awesome or meh, ethically fine or douchey?

[/ QUOTE ]

awesome.

do this now.

Irish Mafia 08-19-2007 12:16 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm thinking about datamining some levels of FTP and then analyzing the play of some particularly regular shorstacks, presumably to release my results publicly. If we beat the hell out of them, maybe they'll stop playing so much and making the games crappier (or at least drop to lower levels so we dont care about them anymore). Any thoughts on that idea; whether its awesome or meh, ethically fine or douchey?

[/ QUOTE ]

awesome.

do this now.

[/ QUOTE ]

DOOOOOOOOOO IT!!! they are the scum of the earth. The couldn't get away w/ their "strategy" playing real poker live. For instance, at Bellagio, buy-in for $200 at a 5-10 game, 3 people limp, shortie shoves 88, gets called by AQ...88 holds. Shortie immediately tells the dealer "deal me out", then immediately walks over to another table (pockets $200 of his winnings), and puts $200 on another on the new table and shoves AJ on his 4th hand. Its impossible to think of someone doing this live - and its a [censored], pathetic thing to do on-line too.

TheJared 08-19-2007 01:29 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
I'm interested what good short stacks we are talking about........

I mine FTP everyday from 2/4-25/50 (marry me hhsmithey) and have been since I got back to Vegas last month, not sure that is long enough for what you guys want.

obiedman 08-19-2007 01:45 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm thinking about datamining some levels of FTP and then analyzing the play of some particularly regular shorstacks, presumably to release my results publicly. If we beat the hell out of them, maybe they'll stop playing so much and making the games crappier (or at least drop to lower levels so we dont care about them anymore). Any thoughts on that idea; whether its awesome or meh, ethically fine or douchey?

[/ QUOTE ]

awesome.

do this now.

[/ QUOTE ]

yea please do, and i might even be interested in doing it alongside you. sounds like a pretty good idea to me

shipurstack 08-19-2007 03:10 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
i tried to put all my dbs together to post a screenshot but it wasn't working too well sorry. the whole exporting 250000 hh's and then importing them didn't go so well. that was one of my smaller dbs too.

yabastid 08-19-2007 03:42 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] tomitivo. his chat is so funny too.

[/ QUOTE ]

Played with him at NL200 the other night. His chat is absolutely hysterical and part of the reason I stayed as long as I did. Plus he dropped a dime in the 2 hrs he was there. I love the "omffffffffffffffffffffffffffffggggggggggggggggggg ggggggggggggggggggggggg! Idiots!" after every hand. Plus he ran like 51/12 or some [censored]. LOL

Tao_Jones 08-19-2007 03:46 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm interested what good short stacks we are talking about........

I mine FTP everyday from 2/4-25/50 (marry me hhsmithey) and have been since I got back to Vegas last month, not sure that is long enough for what you guys want.

[/ QUOTE ]

You mean like every table of each level 2-4 to 25-50??

Moonshine 08-19-2007 07:58 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm thinking about datamining some levels of FTP and then analyzing the play of some particularly regular shorstacks, presumably to release my results publicly. If we beat the hell out of them, maybe they'll stop playing so much and making the games crappier (or at least drop to lower levels so we dont care about them anymore). Any thoughts on that idea; whether its awesome or meh, ethically fine or douchey?

[/ QUOTE ]


I think it's stupid

1. you might as well publish a "how to short stack" post if you're going to do that

2. Is it really worth your time to do all that to try and take back the 1 bb/100 i'm winning from you?

3. It's not like there's much you can do anyway. You call less, we push more and vice versa. We're not THAT stupid


If you're gonna do this, fine, just post it in a private chat or something. nobody wants the games becoming even more flooded than they already are

tcorbin16 08-19-2007 08:32 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
ty moonshine.

tuckercat 08-19-2007 08:35 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
i'm just fine with the shortstackers at FTP. frankly, it's easy money most of the time, and i would be against anything that might be detrimental towards that end. let them short stack all they way.

jfish 08-19-2007 08:42 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
suuuuuuper sick hand here. this match was playing nuts and he has the balls to c/r my overbet on the river. hes really good and says we can play more at a future time, it was a sick match.



Full Tilt Poker Game #3304183816: Table Mare (heads up) - $5/$10 - No Limit Hold'em - 20:29:59 ET - 2007/08/19
Seat 1: Smart LAG ($1,685)
Seat 2: Larimani ($1,447.50)
Smart LAG posts the small blind of $5
Larimani posts the big blind of $10
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Smart LAG [7c Kh]
Smart LAG raises to $30
Larimani: are u jfish?
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG: ya
Larimani calls $20
*** FLOP *** [4c Ad 7h]
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani checks
Smart LAG: who are you
Smart LAG has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG bets $47
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani calls $47
*** TURN *** [4c Ad 7h] [7d]
Larimani checks
Smart LAG has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG bets $129
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani calls $129
*** RIVER *** [4c Ad 7h 7d] [9s]
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani checks
Smart LAG has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG bets $677
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani has requested TIME
Larimani raises to $1,241.50, and is all in
Smart LAG has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG has requested TIME
Smart LAG: ok super sick
Smart LAG: i have K7
Smart LAG: damnit that sucks nh
Smart LAG calls $564.50
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Larimani shows [Td Kc] a pair of Sevens
Smart LAG shows [7c Kh] three of a kind, Sevens
Smart LAG wins the pot ($2,894.50) with three of a kind, Sevens
Larimani is sitting out
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $2,895 | Rake $0.50
Board: [4c Ad 7h 7d 9s]
Seat 1: Smart LAG (small blind) showed [7c Kh] and won ($2,894.50) with three of a kind, Sevens
Seat 2: Larimani (big blind) showed [Td Kc] and lost with a pair of Sevens

JooWish622 08-19-2007 08:45 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
suuuuuuper sick hand here. this match was playing nuts and he has the balls to c/r my overbet on the river. hes really good and says we can play more at a future time, it was a sick match.



Full Tilt Poker Game #3304183816: Table Mare (heads up) - $5/$10 - No Limit Hold'em - 20:29:59 ET - 2007/08/19
Seat 1: Smart LAG ($1,685)
Seat 2: Larimani ($1,447.50)
Smart LAG posts the small blind of $5
Larimani posts the big blind of $10
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Smart LAG [7c Kh]
Smart LAG raises to $30
Larimani: are u jfish?
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG: ya
Larimani calls $20
*** FLOP *** [4c Ad 7h]
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani checks
Smart LAG: who are you
Smart LAG has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG bets $47
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani calls $47
*** TURN *** [4c Ad 7h] [7d]
Larimani checks
Smart LAG has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG bets $129
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani calls $129
*** RIVER *** [4c Ad 7h 7d] [9s]
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani checks
Smart LAG has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG bets $677
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani has requested TIME
Larimani raises to $1,241.50, and is all in
Smart LAG has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG has requested TIME
Smart LAG: ok super sick
Smart LAG: i have K7
Smart LAG: damnit that sucks nh
Smart LAG calls $564.50
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Larimani shows [Td Kc] a pair of Sevens
Smart LAG shows [7c Kh] three of a kind, Sevens
Smart LAG wins the pot ($2,894.50) with three of a kind, Sevens
Larimani is sitting out
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $2,895 | Rake $0.50
Board: [4c Ad 7h 7d 9s]
Seat 1: Smart LAG (small blind) showed [7c Kh] and won ($2,894.50) with three of a kind, Sevens
Seat 2: Larimani (big blind) showed [Td Kc] and lost with a pair of Sevens

[/ QUOTE ]

level?

pokeriseasy 08-19-2007 08:53 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
suuuuuuper sick hand here. this match was playing nuts and he has the balls to c/r my overbet on the river. hes really good and says we can play more at a future time, it was a sick match.



Full Tilt Poker Game #3304183816: Table Mare (heads up) - $5/$10 - No Limit Hold'em - 20:29:59 ET - 2007/08/19
Seat 1: Smart LAG ($1,685)
Seat 2: Larimani ($1,447.50)
Smart LAG posts the small blind of $5
Larimani posts the big blind of $10
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Smart LAG [7c Kh]
Smart LAG raises to $30
Larimani: are u jfish?
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG: ya
Larimani calls $20
*** FLOP *** [4c Ad 7h]
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani checks
Smart LAG: who are you
Smart LAG has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG bets $47
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani calls $47
*** TURN *** [4c Ad 7h] [7d]
Larimani checks
Smart LAG has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG bets $129
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani calls $129
*** RIVER *** [4c Ad 7h 7d] [9s]
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani checks
Smart LAG has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG bets $677
Larimani has 15 seconds left to act
Larimani has requested TIME
Larimani raises to $1,241.50, and is all in
Smart LAG has 15 seconds left to act
Smart LAG has requested TIME
Smart LAG: ok super sick
Smart LAG: i have K7
Smart LAG: damnit that sucks nh
Smart LAG calls $564.50
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Larimani shows [Td Kc] a pair of Sevens
Smart LAG shows [7c Kh] three of a kind, Sevens
Smart LAG wins the pot ($2,894.50) with three of a kind, Sevens
Larimani is sitting out
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $2,895 | Rake $0.50
Board: [4c Ad 7h 7d 9s]
Seat 1: Smart LAG (small blind) showed [7c Kh] and won ($2,894.50) with three of a kind, Sevens
Seat 2: Larimani (big blind) showed [Td Kc] and lost with a pair of Sevens

[/ QUOTE ]

level?

[/ QUOTE ]

How often do you think guys less than min shove over the top of an overbet as a bluff? If Jfish doesn't have a 7 he can't ever call, and he possibly folds 67, because he beats no hands accept total bluffs which are like 5% of his range. There is a reason he requested time with his hand. I doubt this is a level, although I snap call, but I'm not feeling too great about it.

Josh. 08-19-2007 09:24 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm thinking about datamining some levels of FTP and then analyzing the play of some particularly regular shorstacks, presumably to release my results publicly. If we beat the hell out of them, maybe they'll stop playing so much and making the games crappier (or at least drop to lower levels so we dont care about them anymore). Any thoughts on that idea; whether its awesome or meh, ethically fine or douchey?

[/ QUOTE ]


I think it's stupid

1. you might as well publish a "how to short stack" post if you're going to do that

2. Is it really worth your time to do all that to try and take back the 1 bb/100 i'm winning from you?

3. It's not like there's much you can do anyway. You call less, we push more and vice versa. We're not THAT stupid


If you're gonna do this, fine, just post it in a private chat or something. nobody wants the games becoming even more flooded than they already are

[/ QUOTE ]



ahh the sound of desperation

TheJared 08-19-2007 09:57 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm interested what good short stacks we are talking about........

I mine FTP everyday from 2/4-25/50 (marry me hhsmithey) and have been since I got back to Vegas last month, not sure that is long enough for what you guys want.

[/ QUOTE ]

You mean like every table of each level 2-4 to 25-50??

[/ QUOTE ]

yes

Jugador 08-19-2007 10:54 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
I'm a 600/1k regular, JugadorJR. If anyone has thoughts on my play, I'd love to hear about it. I'll add a few comments myself when I have more time this week.

rand 08-19-2007 11:27 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
magistir_Ludi
browerkid
donkeybrane
ekoc
cookbythebook
gawyn
ur_an_asset
polly baller
philuva
ripkevin
RikJamesB1atch
SilentAssassin3
TakeUrCheese
Phobosde

ripkevin Magistir_Ludi and Phobosde (and sometimes gawyn) are the only ones that I have trouble with, thoughts...?

pokeriseasy 08-19-2007 11:34 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
ur_an_asset totally owned me the other day. He's a nit but he seems good from the limited time I've played with him. I don't think philuva is very good.

rand 08-19-2007 11:44 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
yeah i dont either, the top is just a list of people that popped into my head

AAismyfriend 08-19-2007 11:59 PM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm a 600/1k regular, JugadorJR. If anyone has thoughts on my play, I'd love to hear about it. I'll add a few comments myself when I have more time this week.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are very solid IMO, better than most of the regs at 3/6 for sure.

AAismyfriend 08-20-2007 12:02 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
ur_an_asset totally owned me the other day. He's a nit but he seems good from the limited time I've played with him. I don't think philuva is very good.

[/ QUOTE ]

He's def good, but not very tough to play against IMO.

AAismyfriend 08-20-2007 12:04 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
magistir_Ludi
browerkid
donkeybrane
ekoc
cookbythebook
gawyn
ur_an_asset
polly baller
philuva
ripkevin
RikJamesB1atch
SilentAssassin3
TakeUrCheese
Phobosde

ripkevin Magistir_Ludi and Phobosde (and sometimes gawyn) are the only ones that I have trouble with, thoughts...?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ripkeniv.....really?

tcorbin16 08-20-2007 12:33 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm a 600/1k regular, JugadorJR. If anyone has thoughts on my play, I'd love to hear about it. I'll add a few comments myself when I have more time this week.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are very solid IMO, better than most of the regs at 3/6 for sure.

[/ QUOTE ]

i agree with this as well.

captainwacky 08-20-2007 12:57 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
magistir_Ludi
browerkid
donkeybrane
ekoc
cookbythebook
gawyn
ur_an_asset
polly baller
philuva
ripkevin
RikJamesB1atch
SilentAssassin3
TakeUrCheese
Phobosde

ripkevin Magistir_Ludi and Phobosde (and sometimes gawyn) are the only ones that I have trouble with, thoughts...?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ripkeniv.....really?

[/ QUOTE ]

haha... that's exactly what I said to myself when I saw that.

dnh83 08-20-2007 03:43 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
Hey guys. I've been playing at 2-4 for a few months now. I was wondering what you thought of my play.

My sn is tRiCkYsArAhLoLo

jfish 08-20-2007 03:47 AM

Re: The New Official FTP Regulars Thread
 
lol


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.