Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc) (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=548172)

Clayton 11-17-2007 08:35 AM

Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc)
 
ok cool, i called with a five

dirtylobster 11-17-2007 08:36 AM

Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc)
 

Board: 8c 8d 5h
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 42.671% 41.88% 00.79% 156714 2970.00 { 55+, AKs, AKo }
Hand 1: 57.329% 56.54% 00.79% 211566 2970.00 { JJ }

dirtylobster 11-17-2007 08:37 AM

Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc)
 
Lol. What did he have?

EDIT: Ah didn't notice it was 2/4. For 50bb I'd def. stick it in much lighter. But still not with a naked 5. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Clayton 11-17-2007 08:37 AM

Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc)
 
KT

Ratamahatta 11-17-2007 08:46 AM

Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc)
 
Does anyone have custom PAHUD layout for OnGame/PokerRoom and want to share it with me? Please?

bubaloo 11-17-2007 09:10 AM

Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc)
 
[ QUOTE ]
mynameizgreg's video is very good for the first 15 minutes as well.

[/ QUOTE ]
where are the videos on the site? i click vids but it says there arent any up yet.

RockRattler 11-17-2007 09:18 AM

Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc)
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't get what makes the regs threads appropriate for MSNL but not SSNL?

People who think they're circle jerks can just avoid them, but for mine they were just places where people who played in the same games could talk with each other. I followed the Party thread for a while then the FTP thread, and no feathers were ever rustled in either. I never saw anyone outed involuntarily or anything like that, they were just a bit of fun. They also gave people a venue to discuss site specific issues when they arose. It just strikes me as weird to ban them.

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT. Please open

bubaloo 11-17-2007 09:27 AM

Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc)
 
some people say its unlucky to win the first hand of the day.... i say [censored] that

Pacific Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.25/$0.5
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $22.81
UTG+1: $76.25
CO: $52.08
Button: $10.83
SB: $38.71
Bub: $50

Pre-flop: (6 players) Bub is BB with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG calls, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 raises to $1</font>, 3 folds, Bub calls, UTG calls.

Flop: T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($3.25, 3 players)
Bub checks, <font color="#cc0000">UTG bets $2</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#cc0000">Bub raises to $6.5</font>, UTG folds, UTG+1 calls.

Turn: Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($18.25, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Bub bets $13</font>, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 raises to $26</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Bub raises all-in $29.5</font>, UTG+1 calls.

River: 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($99.25, 1 player + 1 all-in - Main pot: $99.25)


Results:
Final pot: $99.25
Bub shows K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG+1 mucks A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

PartysOver 11-17-2007 10:09 AM

Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc)
 
So far I can see the first frame of the video's at LeggoPoker. The rest of the video won't load.

If I'm prompted to login, no pages will load afterwards just the green background.

The "remember me" doesn't work.

I'm on XP using and old version of IE. So far i'm really disappointed [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Daddy Warbucks 11-17-2007 10:32 AM

Re: SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc)
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't get what makes the regs threads appropriate for MSNL but not SSNL?

People who think they're circle jerks can just avoid them, but for mine they were just places where people who played in the same games could talk with each other. I followed the Party thread for a while then the FTP thread, and no feathers were ever rustled in either. I never saw anyone outed involuntarily or anything like that, they were just a bit of fun. They also gave people a venue to discuss site specific issues when they arose. It just strikes me as weird to ban them.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, completely agree. I'd gotten more active in the Party thread in the last 3 weeks, and there was a definite sense of community. I'd love to see them reopen, although i assume there was a legitimate reason they were locked, so i'll wait for the official green line.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.