Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   High Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   100/200 150bb deep - play along (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=432380)

jsnipes28 06-22-2007 04:13 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
i obv haven't played against aba, but against most players i think leading is perfectly fine. i think call>fold>c/r

TheWorstPlayer 06-22-2007 04:13 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
I think I would c/f usually, c/c against some people. Generally c/c against not so great people or really great people but not the run-of-the-mill winners. I've never played against aba, but assume he is great so i would prob c/c.

KRANTZ 06-22-2007 04:15 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
[ QUOTE ]
i obv haven't played against aba, but against most players i think leading is perfectly fine. i think call>fold>c/r

[/ QUOTE ]

why? i know what he can put me on, but what can he look me up with if i lead?

KRANTZ 06-22-2007 04:16 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think I would c/f usually, c/c against some people. Generally c/c against not so great people or really great people but not the run-of-the-mill winners. I've never played against aba, but assume he is great so i would prob c/c.

[/ QUOTE ]

if we assume (and it's a good assumption, clearly) that he is great then c/r should be far and away better than c/c. and wouldn't c/f be better, still? does a great player just make a transparent bluff like this?

TheWorstPlayer 06-22-2007 04:19 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think I would c/f usually, c/c against some people. Generally c/c against not so great people or really great people but not the run-of-the-mill winners. I've never played against aba, but assume he is great so i would prob c/c.

[/ QUOTE ]

if we assume (and it's a good assumption, clearly) that he is great then c/r should be far and away better than c/c. and wouldn't c/f be better, still? does a great player just make a transparent bluff like this?

[/ QUOTE ]
I think great players WILL make transparent bluffs like this because you assume they won't. But yes, I think c/f is fine. No, I dont think c/r is good at all, because he won't VB hands like AQ unless he's going to call a c/r on such a draw heavy board which all missed on the turn. I'd like a c/r for value here with a strong hand since it would let him bluff and would also give you a chance for him to call a c/r with a strong ace.

donkey 06-22-2007 06:27 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
c/f or c/r

c/c is pretty bad against a good player given the action

Ansky 06-23-2007 06:50 AM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
meh i think c/r kinda looks FOS here.

catcher193 06-23-2007 12:03 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
[ QUOTE ]
meh i think c/r kinda looks FOS here.

[/ QUOTE ]
which is why its good for value in certain battles. Easy bet, consider calling.

Bill King 06-23-2007 01:01 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i think once brian checks the flop behind you're probably okay,

[/ QUOTE ]

lol what? why? You think brian isnt check/raising a set a lot of the time here? Or slightly better Axss?

[/ QUOTE ]

i suppose he could check a set but probably not a slightly better Axss IMO

Bill King 06-23-2007 01:08 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
[ QUOTE ]
river c/r would definitely be a bluff not for value

[/ QUOTE ]

this is why i only c/r a [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] river, as far as non hearts i like betting and folding.. checking and calling is pretty weak unless its a bluff catcher


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.