Re: Week 5 NFL thread
 

MT2R = in denial

Seriously, give it up. You're arguing an indefensible position. I can't tell if you're doing it because you think you are right or if you're just trying to piss us off.

Re: Week 5 NFL thread
 

Man, we need to get some video of this up on the internets quick.

Re: Week 5 NFL thread
 

Its nice to watch the late night football highlights again.

Re: Week 5 NFL thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
MT2R = in denial

Seriously, give it up. You're arguing an indefensible position. I can't tell if you're doing it because you think you are right or if you're just trying to piss us off.

[/ QUOTE ]

because I think I'm right and I hate officials

I watched the play slo-mo, frame-by-frame

I could be wrong, but the two views I had don't make me think so

It seems the official just deemed one guy had more of the ball then the other (it was in his gut)

Funny to hear the Packer wideouts on the play

too bad wideouts are about the least trustworthy eyewitnesses in the world

Re: Week 5 NFL thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
you have video that shows his left hand 3 feet away from the ball?

[/ QUOTE ]

I've got it on DVR, just like I would hope you do.

Take a look at Driver's left arm from start to finish. Describe what it does through the play. Convince me that it constitutes "maintaining possession".

Re: Week 5 NFL thread
 

None of this is changing the fact that McCarthy is a terrible coach.

Re: Week 5 NFL thread
 

MT2R: I was rooting for the Packers, and even thought it looked like a joint-possession deal at first. Then I saw the replay. I don't know what you think a catch is, but that's not it. Clear interception.

Re: Week 5 NFL thread
 

Has McCarthy made any comment on the call?

Re: Week 5 NFL thread
 

I'm non biased to each team, and from the replays I saw (sans DVR and slo-mo) I thought it was an int.

Re: Week 5 NFL thread
 

I also thought it was an INT fwiw imo.