Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   KK against thinking opponent (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=554993)

loosbastard 11-27-2007 01:03 AM

Re: KK against thinking opponent
 
[ QUOTE ]
b/f > c/f >> c/c >> b/c against this opponent

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. You're getting owned hardcore if you c/c frequently in this spot.

Speedlimits 11-27-2007 01:08 AM

Re: KK against thinking opponent
 
b/f

dont expect to be called much

Golfdish 11-27-2007 01:15 AM

Re: KK against thinking opponent
 
Why are we wanting to b/f? what hands that we beat will pay us off?

spivey 11-27-2007 01:18 AM

Re: KK against thinking opponent
 
Pretty much any made hand that doesn't beat us now?

traz 11-27-2007 01:32 AM

Re: KK against thinking opponent
 
The more I think about it, the more I hate bet-folding this hand. Seriously, he's so rarely calling with worse here unless he's terrible.

Even if we were double barrel bluffing, the As is a legitimate part of our range and even if TJ+ came this far, he's probably not calling the river.

CF is the only thing that makes sense to me

Speedlimits 11-27-2007 01:35 AM

Re: KK against thinking opponent
 
[ QUOTE ]
The more I think about it, the more I hate bet-folding this hand. Seriously, he's so rarely calling with worse here unless he's terrible.

Even if we were double barrel bluffing, the As is a legitimate part of our range and even if TJ+ came this far, he's probably not calling the river.

CF is the only thing that makes sense to me

[/ QUOTE ]

u realize any good villain is shoving on you if u check this river

jk3a 11-27-2007 01:35 AM

Re: KK against thinking opponent
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
value bet or c/c, i'm not folding

[/ QUOTE ]

what hands do i get value from, and youre not folding to a raise if we bet?

or did you mean youre not c/fing

[/ QUOTE ]

obv. not b/c. I prefer b/f to c/c but even c/c is fine here because he has to have AJ/JJ/99/55 to have you beat on the river.

dregal 11-27-2007 01:36 AM

Re: KK against thinking opponent
 
edit: just saw your post above

traz 11-27-2007 01:38 AM

Re: KK against thinking opponent
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The more I think about it, the more I hate bet-folding this hand. Seriously, he's so rarely calling with worse here unless he's terrible.

Even if we were double barrel bluffing, the As is a legitimate part of our range and even if TJ+ came this far, he's probably not calling the river.

CF is the only thing that makes sense to me

[/ QUOTE ]

u realize any good villain is shoving on you if u check this river

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you name the hands worse than KK that you would bet this river with, and why you would do it? It'd be turning your hand into a bluff 100% of the time, so would that be the goal?

traz 11-27-2007 01:39 AM

Re: KK against thinking opponent
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
value bet or c/c, i'm not folding

[/ QUOTE ]

what hands do i get value from, and youre not folding to a raise if we bet?

or did you mean youre not c/fing

[/ QUOTE ]

obv. not b/c. I prefer b/f to c/c but even c/c is fine here because he has to have AJ/JJ/99/55 to have you beat on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

You don't think he gets this far with some spade draws?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.