Re: Sklansky concedes religious debate o rly?
 

Wooooa! And in so many ways.

A Google image search on "Erik Haber" rendered this baby where a poet named Reverend Dave is mentioned. Also, note the Harry Potter connection.

I don't know what to make of this though:

[ QUOTE ]
Professor Erik Haber
Center for Religious Stidies
Linköpings universitet
581 83 LINKÖPING
Tel: +46 13-28 10 00
Fax: +46 13-14 94 03

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Sklansky concedes religious debate o rly?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Clearly Mr. Yang has demonstrated that religious people are great poker players. Also his win definitely shows he is the best poker player of 2007 since he beat everyone else.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

Re: Sklansky concedes religious debate o rly?
 

[ QUOTE ]
lol donkaments

[/ QUOTE ]
This is the correct answer.

Re: Sklansky concedes religious debate o rly?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know what to make of this though:

[ QUOTE ]
Professor Erik Haber
Center for Religious Stidies
Linköpings universitet
581 83 LINKÖPING
Tel: +46 13-28 10 00
Fax: +46 13-14 94 03

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

They're like titties but with an S.

Re: Sklansky concedes religious debate o rly?
 

[ QUOTE ]
http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/2...penguiner6.png

This is really a more thinly vieled brag about my awesome penguin.

[/ QUOTE ]

When I first read the OP of this thread, I was going to move it to SMP. Now I am very glad that I did not. Good work NVG.

Re: Sklansky concedes religious debate o rly?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I have a little toy penguin on my desk.
It is cute, and wears a scarf.
If you twist its handle, it will do backflips.
Pretty ballin.

My penguin is fifteen times smarter than sheetsworld. Also, sheetsworld's IQ is roughly that of mayonaisse.

[/ QUOTE ]

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GGS5TiP5jSQ"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GGS5TiP5jSQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

Re: Sklansky concedes religious debate o rly?
 

It's not really fit for a professor to conclude anything on such a small sample size. The average religious/superstitious poker player has irrational beliefs about chance and math, and therefore will achieve less in long term poker.

In short term it's surely possible to win anything, these last 2 WSOP's have clearly proven that. I don't see why Sklansky would have to concede anything on this matter.

Re: Sklansky concedes religious debate o rly?
 

God loves donkeys mostest...

Re: Sklansky concedes religious debate o rly?
 

Why do I not get any hits when searching for your name in the employee search engine for Linköpings universitet?

Re: Sklansky concedes religious debate o rly?
 

[ QUOTE ]
http://i11.tinypic.com/54knfnq.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, thats so offensive. Yet I laughed [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]