Re: Can you call it \'terrorism\' if no one is scared?
 

Slighy off-topic but here is website of a guy who set about the terrorists at Glasgow Intl.

John Smeaton

Re: Can you call it \'terrorism\' if no one is scared?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Slighy off-topic but here is website of a guy who set about the terrorists at Glasgow Intl.

John Smeaton

[/ QUOTE ]

WTF? ROFL. I got sucked in trying to make sense out of this site. Some funny stuff.

[ QUOTE ]
When the camera cut back to the studio, you could see them blinking and wondering just what language it was they had just heard.

[/ QUOTE ]

They weren't alone.

Re: Can you call it \'terrorism\' if no one is scared?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Just to be clear, I don't want to soften and make fuzzy what's done, I just want a term that is either more appropriate, or that belittle the hateful idiots that do this stuff. Preferably both if there's such a phrase.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think "suicidal murderous a**holes" works nicely. I'd like to see that used on the nightly news.

"Tonight, in London, another two muderous suicidal [censored] blew themselves up in a crowded marketplace. They murdered 5 and wounded 20 others in the attack. Officer Smith, when asked if there was a motive for the attack simply replied 'I guess they were just a bunch of [censored]."

Yeah, I'd like to hear that for a change.

Re: Can you call it \'terrorism\' if no one is scared?
 

How about, "The Moral Equivalent of Our Founding Fathers", to bring a little Reaganistic through-the-looking-glass style to it.