Re: Special Sklansky Question: Arenas vs Duke
 

Good argument. Very cunning. You rock at the internet. My favorite thing is how you're so upbeat, even though people are clearly not as smart as you.

Re: Special Sklansky Question: Arenas vs Duke
 

pudge,

It's #1 easy. Giblert could easily sprain his ankle in the first half or something.

Re: Special Sklansky Question: Arenas vs Duke
 

My guess would be that he'd score somewhere between 50-60.

Re: Special Sklansky Question: Arenas vs Duke
 

MT2R, you are the biggest NCAA bball homer ever. I don't care if it takes more time to run a play, or if everyone has to play D together. The players are much worse overall and that is why they take so long to score and they have to play D together.

Re: Special Sklansky Question: Arenas vs Duke
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming he was out to score at every possession? 75+

[/ QUOTE ]

no way

college is a completely different animal-- defensive sets are ridiculously more complex
his team might not score 75

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you explain this comment? I played DII ball under a coach who was a former DI assistant and I wouldn't exactly call our defenses "complex." I understand that theres a lot more pressing in college, so perhaps you're saying that theres more defensive presses to remember than in the NBA.

Re: Special Sklansky Question: Arenas vs Duke
 

[ QUOTE ]
Duke sucks, he would score at will.

This would be interesting against a good college basketball tema.

[/ QUOTE ]As a Terp fan, I hate Duke too, but this is just a silly comment and really has nothing to do with the thread(as he was just trying to pick a random good team imo).

Re: Special Sklansky Question: Arenas vs Duke
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming he was out to score at every possession? 75+

[/ QUOTE ]

no way

college is a completely different animal--defensive sets are ridiculously more complex

his team might not score 75

[/ QUOTE ]

lol yeah college defense is much more complex than pro defense good one

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't really understand how anyone could watch the two games, study the two games, and think otherwise.
College defenses have to stop offensive sets that have 35 seconds to work with to obtain a quality shot. In addition, there are no illegal defenses. The off-the-ball motion on both defense and offense is much more a part of the game in college ball. Pro ball seems to always boil down to isolate and use superior match-ups.

I'm struggling for words here as I don't understand how one cannot view the college game as more complex. I'm baffled. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] It's in the structure of the rules themselves.

[/ QUOTE ]

Imo once you know the basics of playing defense there is nothing complex about man-to-man defense really. The most common thing that the average rec player doesn't understand is rotations off of double teams. Basically theres two kinds of help: Big man stepping up to help on a driving guard OR guard going down to double team a big man.

With the former:
-Big man steps up to help on driving guard
-Far weak side defender fills in on that big man's man
-Near weak side defender plays sort of in between the two perimeter players(his man and the man of the guy who just left) and has next pass out
-after the pass out, pretty much scramble to get on a man

With the latter
-guard doubles down
-Near weak side guard has next pass
-guy doubling down scrambles back to open man


Zone is a bit more complex only because there are different ones and it'd take too long to go through them all. However its not that complicated at all imo.


In the end, I think its a rather moot debate as neither NBA defense nor college defense is that hard to learn imo(although I obviously can't speak from experience regarding NBA defense). Its not like football where there are tons of plays to memorize.

Re: Special Sklansky Question: Arenas vs Duke
 

[ QUOTE ]
Arenas would be called for traveling no fewer than 10 times in the first half.

Every Duke player for the past decade has pretty much been NBA caliber or very close to it.

The game is 8 minutes shorter.

Shot clock is 11 seconds longer, meaning theoretically fewer shots should be taken.

No continuation, no defensive 3 seconds.

Shorter 3 point line.

He'd score 25.

[/ QUOTE ]You do realize that JJ Reddick averaged over 25 per game last year, right? You don't think that Arenas right now is a better scorer than JJ last year?

Re: Special Sklansky Question: Arenas vs Duke
 

[ QUOTE ]
(as he was just trying to pick a random good team imo).

[/ QUOTE ]

If "he" == Arenas, the choice of Duke was not random.
Funny thing is, last time Arenas played in a college game, it was against Duke.

Re: Special Sklansky Question: Arenas vs Duke
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
(as he was just trying to pick a random good team imo).

[/ QUOTE ]

If "he" == Arenas, the choice of Duke was not random.
Funny thing is, last time Arenas played in a college game, it was against Duke.

[/ QUOTE ]

By "he" I meant OP, but I see that I was wrong now. I've been in AC the past few days and havn't been following things, so I didn't know about Arenas saying that.