Re: Abortions cutoffs and the Emancipation of Children cutoffs
 

If I'm not mistaken, the term "parasite" is incorrect in reference a fetus, because in biology it implies the organism is of a different species.

Re: Abortions cutoffs and the Emancipation of Children cutoffs
 

No, it refers to the nature of the relationship between two organisms regardless of their species. The foetus is parasitic to the mother.

Re: Abortions cutoffs and the Emancipation of Children cutoffs
 

In what (other) specific instance does biology refer to organisms of the same species as being in a host-parasite relationship?

Re: Abortions cutoffs and the Emancipation of Children cutoffs
 

[ QUOTE ]
If I'm not mistaken, the term "parasite" is incorrect in reference a fetus, because in biology it implies the organism is of a different species.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe, but I couldn't think of a different word to describe the relationship. Does it make any difference to the point?

Re: Abortions cutoffs and the Emancipation of Children cutoffs
 

[ QUOTE ]
In what (other) specific instance does biology refer to organisms of the same species as being in a host-parasite relationship?

[/ QUOTE ]

post-school age children

luckyme

Re: Abortions cutoffs and the Emancipation of Children cutoffs
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If I'm not mistaken, the term "parasite" is incorrect in reference a fetus, because in biology it implies the organism is of a different species.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe, but I couldn't think of a different word to describe the relationship. Does it make any difference to the point?

[/ QUOTE ]

It could make a difference in the baggage it carries, not that you intended anything. I had seen the term used that way before, and it always seemed weird. Just thought I'd mention it this time.