Re: My ability to start threads in BBV4life
 

Who cares about a title? Its the OP that matters.

Re: My ability to start threads in BBV4life
 

kk,

So far Eric is the only poster who I can think of being in the spot. This is in part because the gimmick was allowed more latitude by Gildy et all that I would do for similar gimmicks. So the next EricW probably gets cut off at the knees before he gains the following that makes me simply not ban him.

This is not a personal grudge. I'm not letting somebody troll the forum with stupid posts with an 8th grade mentality to sex. Because the guy behind the gimmick is funny, when he tries, he makes posts like the op of this thread. Your average EricW post is a lot less entertaining.

The point of BBV4L isn't "anything goes." It's a controlled chaos, and there's some expectation that the tone is something that is acceptable on a website tied to a for profit publishing forum.

Re: My ability to start threads in BBV4life
 

its not about the title or a new thread, its about not sifting thru 300 replies of [censored] just to see his newest post

Re: My ability to start threads in BBV4life
 

i read "dids ridiculous decision" from op, as "redidsulous decision", coincidence?

Re: My ability to start threads in BBV4life
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think EricW's curiousity about humans can be contained in one thread.

EricW doesn't limit himself to one religion.
EricW doesn't limit himself to one gender.
EricW doesn't limit himself to one species.
EricW doesn't limit himself to one gimmick.

Free EricW.

[/ QUOTE ]

<font color="white">okay so i don't care all THAT much, i just like making EricW-related MSPaints</font>

Re: My ability to start threads in BBV4life
 

[ QUOTE ]
Who cares about a title? Its the OP that matters.

[/ QUOTE ]
it's no longer an OP if it's in a containment thread....

(BIG)BIG_AL

PS. titles also attract people to read the post. If people don't want to read EW, then why don't they just not read it?

Re: My ability to start threads in BBV4life
 

[ QUOTE ]
You can't just ban me because you hold a personal grudge.

[/ QUOTE ]

He can make you post all your crap in one thread, though.

Re: My ability to start threads in BBV4life
 

[ QUOTE ]
kk,

So far Eric is the only poster who I can think of being in the spot. This is in part because the gimmick was allowed more latitude by Gildy et all that I would do for similar gimmicks. So the next EricW probably gets cut off at the knees before he gains the following that makes me simply not ban him.

This is not a personal grudge. I'm not letting somebody troll the forum with stupid posts with an 8th grade mentality to sex. Because the guy behind the gimmick is funny, when he tries, he makes posts like the op of this thread. Your average EricW post is a lot less entertaining.

The point of BBV4L isn't "anything goes." It's a controlled chaos, and there's some expectation that the tone is something that is acceptable on a website tied to a for profit publishing forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

Again, you haven't addressed the fact that the posting of your half nude shots are 10000000x worse for business than any of my posts could ever be. Also, my posts are innocent compared to much of the content in the threads of any "2+2 community" sub-forum.

And I am NOT a troll.

Re: My ability to start threads in BBV4life
 

Eric,

I would say the follow rules are the ones that you push:

"5- Seriously post less about dicks.

6- Remember that this is a message board tied to a for profit publishing company that wants to make mad loot. As such you can't do anything you want to, and some things that I might think are a damn laugh riot aren't ok."

Obviously #5 is my way of saying that there were/are far too many juvenile sex/relationship threads in BBV4L. To be frank, it was many of your posts that specifically motivated that rule. #

Re: My ability to start threads in BBV4life
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You can't just ban me because you hold a personal grudge.

[/ QUOTE ]

He can make you post all your crap in one thread, though.

[/ QUOTE ]
sure he CAN. That's not the point. The point is why should he have to? This decision goes against everything bbv4l stands for (albeit that's very little)

(BIG)BIG_AL