Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   High Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   100/200 150bb deep - play along (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=432380)

TheWorstPlayer 06-22-2007 03:26 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
no, flop went chkchkchk. turn went bet/call/fold. i agree that turn should be checked. i would c/c or c/f the river. def don't think you're ahead 50% of the time you're called on the river (although of course I agree you're ahead more than 50% of the time, which is irrelevant).

KRANTZ 06-22-2007 03:33 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
what about river c/r?

TheWorstPlayer 06-22-2007 03:39 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
for value? too thin. for bluff? insane.

RichGangi 06-22-2007 03:39 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
[ QUOTE ]
I am leading river again hoping to get looked up light thinking that you took a stab on the turn w/ any number of oesd/gutter/fd hands.

I would seriously consider calling a raise as well.

[/ QUOTE ]

jsnipes28 06-22-2007 03:41 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
[ QUOTE ]
what about river c/r?

[/ QUOTE ]

i just don't think he's going to betting <Ax if you check to him outside of busted draws so there's no point in c/r those. If somehow you knew that he would bet 2nd pair then I think a river c/r would be pretty sick.

KRANTZ 06-22-2007 03:51 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
river c/r would definitely be a bluff not for value

jsnipes28 06-22-2007 04:01 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
[ QUOTE ]
river c/r would definitely be a bluff not for value

[/ QUOTE ]

wtf are you trying to bluff and how could you ever assume he's only betting hand that beat you if you check given the action?

TheWorstPlayer 06-22-2007 04:04 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
[ QUOTE ]
river c/r would definitely be a bluff not for value

[/ QUOTE ]
i'm gonna stick with 'insane'. i think c/c is a LOT better than c/r.

KRANTZ 06-22-2007 04:08 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
river c/r would definitely be a bluff not for value

[/ QUOTE ]
i'm gonna stick with 'insane'. i think c/c is a LOT better than c/r.

[/ QUOTE ]

what about c/f? where do you rate that?

couldn't i play a set exactly the same way with a river c/r?

i don't know if he will only bet hands that beat me. i hold the 3h so i could also have 3h5h. will aba make a somewhat obvious bluff with a missed draw? all relevant.

if he is betting for value, he probably has AT-AQ. so how is a c/r insane?

KRANTZ 06-22-2007 04:10 PM

Re: 100/200 150bb deep - play along
 
FullTiltPoker Game #2726546393: Table Data (6 max) - $100/$200 - No Limit Hold'em - 3:27:39 ET - 2007/06/21
Seat 1: pr1nnyraid ($34,878)
Seat 2: sbrugby ($36,188)
Seat 3: MUCKEMSAYUHH ($37,305.50)
Seat 4: TeeDitty ($35,508)
Seat 5: LucLongley ($39,279)
Seat 6: tkdcrew ($42,485)
pr1nnyraid posts the small blind of $100
sbrugby posts the big blind of $200
The button is in seat #6
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to pr1nnyraid [3h Ah]
MUCKEMSAYUHH folds
TeeDitty has 15 seconds left to act
TeeDitty raises to $700
LucLongley folds
tkdcrew folds
pr1nnyraid calls $600
sbrugby calls $500
*** FLOP *** [As 8h 4c]
pr1nnyraid checks
sbrugby has 15 seconds left to act
sbrugby checks
TeeDitty checks
*** TURN *** [As 8h 4c] [9h]
pr1nnyraid bets $1,600
sbrugby calls $1,600
TeeDitty folds
*** RIVER *** [As 8h 4c 9h] [2s]
pr1nnyraid checks
sbrugby bets $4,800

i hate a lead, btw, MAYBE he looks me up with something like 9Ts, but it's super thin


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.