Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)
 

You guys are all retards that barely have a high school education. I'm surprised you can actually get through reading a multi-paragraph post let alone actually understanding the meaning of it.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)
 

Ban the kiddie imo.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)
 

[ QUOTE ]
You guys are all retards that barely have a high school education. I'm surprised you can actually get through reading a multi-paragraph post let alone actually understanding the meaning of it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Did you just level yourself seeing as how someone had already comment on what you just wrote before? Seriously - don’t throw bricks in glass houses...

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)
 

I didnt read whole post so dont know if anyone mentioned this. Although Doyle's physical read was 100% correct (gold thought he had the nuts, and was giving off tells that it was the case), in reality the only hands that DOyle doesnt beat that is consistent with jamie gold's play are q7ss - q2ss.

Although it can be argued that these are likely holdings in this game, i think doyle still has to call/or stack gold in this situation

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)
 

[ QUOTE ]
You guys are all retards that barely have a high school education. I'm surprised you can actually get through reading a multi-paragraph post let alone actually understanding the meaning of it.

[/ QUOTE ]

I understood exactly what you were saying, but I thought you were very much wrong. Part of the skill of poker is understanding your opponents, the more you respect their game the more wary you are about tangling with them - you'll take more chances against someone you think is a fish. But no one is conspiring with each other - any money you win is good, no matter who from.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)
 

What's up with everyone going on about how good doyle read was? Gold was acting like a kid on christmas ffs..who does not pick up on that?

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)
 

By the way, has anyone mentioned the possibility that gold knew where doyle was at and made that play exactly for that reason?
I know that everyone here despises gold and think he is the worst player so i assume the answer is no.
Nonetheless, could this have been an intentional great play from gold?

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)
 

Gold raised because he felt he had the best hand, I don't know why he is being villified for it. Like others have said it's easy when you can see the hole cards but seriously who there wouldn't think a 9-high flush would be good after Doyle made such a weak bet

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)
 

[ QUOTE ]
By the way, has anyone mentioned the possibility that gold knew where doyle was at and made that play exactly for that reason?
I know that everyone here despises gold and think he is the worst player so i assume the answer is no.
Nonetheless, could this have been an intentional great play from gold?

[/ QUOTE ]

Uhm.. no.

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (11/5 - 500k buyin - Spoilers expected)
 

[ QUOTE ]
By the way, has anyone mentioned the possibility that gold knew where doyle was at and made that play exactly for that reason?
I know that everyone here despises gold and think he is the worst player so i assume the answer is no.
Nonetheless, could this have been an intentional great play from gold?

[/ QUOTE ]

no way, I agree that Gold literally had thought he had the best hand there since he prob thought Doyle had some strong A. I'm sort of surprised that Doyle didn't just call and see what the river brought, since he was in position, but I think he saw or heard something that Jaime said that must of meant that Jaime was strong, cause Antonio did comment that Doyle was strong and folded something good there. So I don't know, very curious and wondering what Doyle's thinking was on that hand.