Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   News, Views, and Gossip (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1 (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=544612)

TonyRoflmao 11-12-2007 09:36 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
mike usually plays 10/20 - 25/50 fwiw

bigbb33 11-12-2007 09:36 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
Whoever Mike is (esp if it's good2cu), he's going to have a very bad morning tomorrow when he logs back on.

iplayscared 11-12-2007 09:36 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
Full Tilt Poker Game #4156376643: Table Cairo (heads up) - $300/$600 - No Limit Hold'em - 20:33:19 ET - 2007/11/12
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 ($52,798)
Seat 2: tie53 ($306,811.25)
tie53 posts the small blind of $300
Shark_Man_Mike1 posts the big blind of $600
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
tie53 raises to $1,800
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $6,000
tie53 has 15 seconds left to act
tie53 has requested TIME
tie53 raises to $17,000
Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act
Shark_Man_Mike1 has requested TIME
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $52,798, and is all in
tie53 calls $35,798
Shark_Man_Mike1 shows [9c 9h]
tie53 shows [Qh Ac]
*** FLOP *** [Ts 4d 4c]
*** TURN *** [Ts 4d 4c] [Js]
*** RIVER *** [Ts 4d 4c Js] [5c]
Shark_Man_Mike1 shows two pair, Nines and Fours
tie53 shows a pair of Fours
Shark_Man_Mike1 wins the pot ($105,595.50) with two pair, Nines and Fours
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $105,596 | Rake $0.50
Board: [Ts 4d 4c Js 5c]
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 (big blind) showed [9c 9h] and won ($105,595.50) with two pair, Nines and Fours
Seat 2: tie53 (small blind) showed [Qh Ac] and lost with a pair of Fours

[/ QUOTE ]

could u post that any faster? chill out bro, its ok if ur not the one who posts the hand buddy

bigbb33 11-12-2007 09:37 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Full Tilt Poker Game #4156376643: Table Cairo (heads up) - $300/$600 - No Limit Hold'em - 20:33:19 ET - 2007/11/12
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 ($52,798)
Seat 2: tie53 ($306,811.25)
tie53 posts the small blind of $300
Shark_Man_Mike1 posts the big blind of $600
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
tie53 raises to $1,800
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $6,000
tie53 has 15 seconds left to act
tie53 has requested TIME
tie53 raises to $17,000
Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act
Shark_Man_Mike1 has requested TIME
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $52,798, and is all in
tie53 calls $35,798
Shark_Man_Mike1 shows [9c 9h]
tie53 shows [Qh Ac]
*** FLOP *** [Ts 4d 4c]
*** TURN *** [Ts 4d 4c] [Js]
*** RIVER *** [Ts 4d 4c Js] [5c]
Shark_Man_Mike1 shows two pair, Nines and Fours
tie53 shows a pair of Fours
Shark_Man_Mike1 wins the pot ($105,595.50) with two pair, Nines and Fours
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $105,596 | Rake $0.50
Board: [Ts 4d 4c Js 5c]
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 (big blind) showed [9c 9h] and won ($105,595.50) with two pair, Nines and Fours
Seat 2: tie53 (small blind) showed [Qh Ac] and lost with a pair of Fours

[/ QUOTE ]

could u post that any faster? chill out bro, its ok if ur not the one who posts the hand buddy

[/ QUOTE ]

Posting super fast is fine - if I'm not first, I just edit out my post so it doesn't clutter it up.

ElDuque 11-12-2007 09:39 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
mike usually plays 10/20 - 25/50 fwiw

[/ QUOTE ]

OMG. I hope he isn't risking most or all of his roll.....

Actually, yes I am.

Rob121 11-12-2007 09:40 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
ha it is goodtoseeu or whatever it is i feel bad for the dude seemed like a funny kid.

Ishan 11-12-2007 09:41 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
LOL why play hu and flip - doesnt make sense

bigbb33 11-12-2007 09:41 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
ha it is goodtoseeu or whatever it is i feel bad for the dude seemed like a funny kid.

[/ QUOTE ]

Predicting something?

Ishan 11-12-2007 09:41 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
Tie rulz OMFG
Mike on 13k on table 2

EWS87 11-12-2007 09:41 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
holy [censored] i go to get food and come back while leaving pt to datamine and see mike down 458K wtf

EWS87 11-12-2007 09:42 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
really hope this isnt jman

DopamineRelease 11-12-2007 09:42 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
if you google shark_man_mike1, a hand on pokerhand.org comes up. if you click on the hand, it says posted by good2cu.

i'm assuming that's what he's referring to.

[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1574559

See, it was pretty easy

jessicaalbiel 11-12-2007 09:43 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
really hope this isnt jman

[/ QUOTE ]

he's on the waiting list

Stellastarr 11-12-2007 09:44 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
Looks like he got some more money from somewhere.. He reloaded to a full buyin.

ElDuque 11-12-2007 09:45 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
really hope this isnt jman

[/ QUOTE ]

Jman runs too good. Impossible for him to lose this much.

nazahl 11-12-2007 09:46 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
good2cu is 3bet/folding a ton

Rob121 11-12-2007 09:46 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
if you google shark_man_mike1, a hand on pokerhand.org comes up. if you click on the hand, it says posted by good2cu.

i'm assuming that's what he's referring to.

[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1574559

See, it was pretty easy

[/ QUOTE ]
i dont get it

dying2win 11-12-2007 09:47 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
tie will bust on these tables unless he leaves soon

HEK 11-12-2007 09:52 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
i was gonna watch spiderman 3 but this is way better

DopamineRelease 11-12-2007 09:52 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
if you google shark_man_mike1, a hand on pokerhand.org comes up. if you click on the hand, it says posted by good2cu.

i'm assuming that's what he's referring to.

[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.pokerhand.org/?1574559

See, it was pretty easy

[/ QUOTE ]
i dont get it

[/ QUOTE ]
At the top it says the hh was posted by g2cu, lol. Then in the hh it says dealt to Shark_Man_Mike1. Therefore, Shark_Man_Mike1 = g2cu

EWS87 11-12-2007 09:53 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
i think i missed tie lose between 100-300K at the beginning but this is pretty nuts

http://img110.imageshack.us/img110/6619/sickxq1.jpg

Casper0 11-12-2007 09:54 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
Swongs are one thing ....but DAMN!

Casper0 11-12-2007 09:58 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
Tie sitting with 6.5 Buy ins at Table 'Boss' NLH

Gus Sitting with 9 Buy ins at Table 'Eginton' PLO

Tie needs to play catch-up

[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

DopamineRelease 11-12-2007 10:00 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly takes almost no effort to figure out. Heh, Im thinking now that it was pretty pointless to post that tho

[/ QUOTE ] So who the hell is it retard? Dont act like you're all high and mighty because you found something out.

[/ QUOTE ]
Maybe you should read my post again you [censored] idiot. People make new accounts to hide their identity. I didn't feel like being a dick about it and outing him so I hinted at how easy it was to find it. I didn't act high and mighty and if you PMed me I would have told you. I just didn't want to be the one to say that it was g2cu because I would not want someone to out me if I played nosebleed nl. Maybe if you tryed to actually do something by yourself you would have found that it was fairly easy to find. All you had to do was google it and read.

bigbb33 11-12-2007 10:01 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
Full Tilt Poker Game #4156676545: Table Cairo (heads up) - $300/$600 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:00:15 ET - 2007/11/12
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 ($127,188.50)
Seat 2: tie53 ($232,409.75)
Shark_Man_Mike1 posts the small blind of $300
tie53 posts the big blind of $600
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $1,800
tie53 calls $1,200
*** FLOP *** [2s 3c Qh]
tie53 checks
Shark_Man_Mike1 bets $2,400
tie53 calls $2,400
*** TURN *** [2s 3c Qh] [4h]
tie53 has 15 seconds left to act
tie53 checks
Shark_Man_Mike1 bets $7,200
tie53 calls $7,200
*** RIVER *** [2s 3c Qh 4h] [Td]
tie53 checks
Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act
Shark_Man_Mike1 bets $27,600
tie53 has 15 seconds left to act
tie53 calls $27,600
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Shark_Man_Mike1 shows [5c Ah] a straight, Five high
tie53 mucks
Shark_Man_Mike1 wins the pot ($77,999.50) with a straight, Five high
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $78,000 | Rake $0.50
Board: [2s 3c Qh 4h Td]
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 (small blind) collected ($77,999.50)
Seat 2: tie53 (big blind) mucked

bigbb33 11-12-2007 10:02 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
tie sits out, says brb

goofyballer 11-12-2007 10:02 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
You realize that despite your high and mighty air of superiority you're effectively outing anyway by pointing out how easy it is to find it, right?

bigbb33 11-12-2007 10:06 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
back on

a nonymous 11-12-2007 10:08 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
You realize that despite your high and mighty air of superiority you're effectively outing anyway by pointing out how easy it is to find it, right?

[/ QUOTE ]
QFT

Perestroika 11-12-2007 10:09 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
I am super glad I don't have to go through what G2CU will be going through tomorrow morning. God I bet he wished he smoked a joint and watched high stakes poker instead. [censored]

DopamineRelease 11-12-2007 10:10 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
You realize that despite your high and mighty air of superiority you're effectively outing anyway by pointing out how easy it is to find it, right?

[/ QUOTE ]
I wouldn't really call it outing because I never actually said it was g2cu until jeffmet posted. All I said was that it was easy to find. I Didn't mention HOW you could find it or anything else. I just wanted to let people know they could find it if they really wanted to. I didn't mean to come off sounding high and mighty and I don't think I did. Trying to contribute but not actually out him. I guess you can't do both because people don't want to do anything themseleves. But, think what you want man. I really don't get off by trying to look high and mighty on the internets

Phreak 11-12-2007 10:11 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
lol what if tie was a superuser who is doing it the "right way"

Stellastarr 11-12-2007 10:11 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
Tie sitting with 6.5 Buy ins at Table 'Boss' NLH

Gus Sitting with 9 Buy ins at Table 'Eginton' PLO

Tie needs to play catch-up

[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Gus is actually winning.. lol

Vega33 11-12-2007 10:12 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
Mike has 150k on one table- he's one hand away from being back in this thing.

yaaam1484 11-12-2007 10:12 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
imagine if tie53 becomes a shark and no one will play him

Perestroika 11-12-2007 10:14 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
imagine if tie53 becomes a shark and no one will play him

[/ QUOTE ]

My head is exploding.

ElDuque 11-12-2007 10:20 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You realize that despite your high and mighty air of superiority you're effectively outing anyway by pointing out how easy it is to find it, right?

[/ QUOTE ]
I wouldn't really call it outing because I never actually said it was g2cu until jeffmet posted. All I said was that it was easy to find. I Didn't mention HOW you could find it or anything else. I just wanted to let people know they could find it if they really wanted to. I didn't mean to come off sounding high and mighty and I don't think I did. Trying to contribute but not actually out him. I guess you can't do both because people don't want to do anything themseleves. But, think what you want man. I really don't get off by trying to look high and mighty on the internets

[/ QUOTE ]

You are all a bunch of cry babies. Plz stop ruining this good thread by making yourselves the topic. We only care about rich people.

billb 11-12-2007 10:24 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
[ QUOTE ]
imagine if tie53 becomes a shark and no one will play him

[/ QUOTE ]

Is there any chance he could be a good player(PA?) and just donking around till he gets enough weaker players looking to crush him then turn the tides and wipe everyone out?

Kind of wierd PA isn't sitting in or Aba?

andy099 11-12-2007 10:31 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
nice 100k raise into like 6k pot or something by mike

bigbb33 11-12-2007 10:31 PM

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 
Full Tilt Poker Game #4157013671: Table Cairo (heads up) - $300/$600 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:29:40 ET - 2007/11/12
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 ($179,291.50)
Seat 2: tie53 ($180,294.75)
tie53 posts the small blind of $300
Shark_Man_Mike1 posts the big blind of $600
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
tie53 raises to $1,800
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $6,120
tie53 calls $4,320
*** FLOP *** [Ts Jd 6s]
Shark_Man_Mike1 bets $8,400
tie53 calls $8,400
*** TURN *** [Ts Jd 6s] [2d]
Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act
Shark_Man_Mike1 bets $22,500
tie53 has 15 seconds left to act
tie53 calls $22,500
*** RIVER *** [Ts Jd 6s 2d] [2c]
Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act
Shark_Man_Mike1 checks
tie53 has 15 seconds left to act
tie53 checks
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Shark_Man_Mike1 shows [Qd Kd] a pair of Twos
tie53 shows [As 7s] a pair of Twos
tie53 wins the pot ($74,039.50) with a pair of Twos
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $74,040 | Rake $0.50
Board: [Ts Jd 6s 2d 2c]
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 (big blind) showed [Qd Kd] and lost with a pair of Twos
Seat 2: tie53 (small blind) showed [As 7s] and won ($74,039.50) with a pair of Twos


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.