Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
Don't you love how Hanaway brags about locking me up for two years because I was a big mouth?

[/ QUOTE ]

What's the story behind this?

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Looks like it's started. Could the picture quality be any worse? At least the sound is good.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Not really

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

I'm tilting already.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Don't you love how Hanaway brags about locking me up for two years because I was a big mouth?

[/ QUOTE ]

What's the story behind this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Free Jay Cohen (now Vindicate Jay Cohen)

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Is there a way to save the video stream so I can watch later? I assume the video will be online at some point in the future, but I'd like to be able to watch before it is put online (assuming it won't happen immediately). As soon as my baby wakes up from her nap, I doubt I'll be able to keep watching.

I suppose I could pause the video. That might work.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

I am having trouble getting to play, I am using Real Player, what are you using, I see / hear nothing, only connecting....

obg

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]

I am having trouble getting to play, I am using Real Player, what are you using, I see / hear nothing, only connecting....

obg

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm using Real Player, no problems (except that the video quality stinks).

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I am having trouble getting to play, I am using Real Player, what are you using, I see / hear nothing, only connecting....

obg

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm using Real Player, no problems (except that the video quality stinks).

[/ QUOTE ]

same here

BTW -- F Lamar Smith

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Shelley Berkley is so awesome that I think I could convince my wife that a divorce would be a good idea so I could marry the esteemed Congresswoman.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Mr. Goodlatte, financial ruin, etc., ARE uncommon amongst internet gamblers. Citing two examples does not make it common.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Cool that Valerie Abend simply discussed the facts without appearing to take a side.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Weiler DOES have a view on internet gambling, despite his proclamations otherwise. He clearly plays online poker -- I have no doubt about it [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Can you guys keep posting highlights (and lowlights) for those of us at work and unable to watch?

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
Weiler DOES have a view on internet gambling, despite his proclamations otherwise. He clearly plays online poker -- I have no doubt about it [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Love this guy and his example..Spit in the face of the DOJ..

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Joseph Weiler did a great job on the WTO.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Is Duke on a time limit? She's making Vanessa Rousso's speaking seem slow.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
Is Duke on a time limit? She's making Vanessa Rousso's speaking seem slow.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think they're all on a time limit.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Is Duke on a time limit? She's making Vanessa Rousso's speaking seem slow.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think they're all on a time limit.

[/ QUOTE ]

But Conyers doesn't speak fast for anyone. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

I'm sure there's a time limit, but Annie was more rushed than any of the other speakers on the panel.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'm sure there's a time limit, but Annie was more rushed than any of the other speakers on the panel.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm glad Tom McClusky ran out of time.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'm sure there's a time limit, but Annie was more rushed than any of the other speakers on the panel.

[/ QUOTE ]

She seemed very nervous..

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm sure there's a time limit, but Annie was more rushed than any of the other speakers on the panel.

[/ QUOTE ]

She seemed very nervous..

[/ QUOTE ]
Like she was about to say yes when no one asks?
Seriously, Annie almost always seems a bit frenetic.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
Can you guys keep posting highlights (and lowlights) for those of us at work and unable to watch?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm slightly behind because I had to pause the video, but here is a summary of the opening statements:

Proponents - logical arguments

Opponents - gambling has caused the downfall of many civilizations, Christians hate it, and since there are no regulations on the internet, gambling shouldn't be regulated.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

I am cruising Cspan and Cspan-2? Is there any coverage of this?

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Hearing link (real audio)

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
I am cruising Cspan and Cspan-2? Is there any coverage of this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, no. Just online.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

The DOJ aszwipe has tried to divert the discussion to sexual predators online, and the Calopy guy has fallen for it. Annie Duke now talking about it and giving a bad example of technology.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Annie Duke's Q&A is better than her testimony.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

ok, TY guys, i am trying to listen online! Think positive thoughts

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
Annie Duke now talking about it and giving a bad example of technology.

[/ QUOTE ]

She wisely moved off it, at least.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Annie Duke now talking about it and giving a bad example of technology.

[/ QUOTE ]

She wisely moved off it, at least.

[/ QUOTE ]

She was much better in the Q&A..Loved the re-directs to the DOJ only wished they would've/could've pressed her more specically on the Wire Act..

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Just tuned in. Is it over or are they resuming?

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

They're in recess because of votes they need to do.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Very basic question...What are they voting on????

And where did Rep Berkley go???? She was great but must've left after her testimony..Would've loved to hear her reply to the DOJ and the FoF guy...

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Annie Duke now talking about it and giving a bad example of technology.

[/ QUOTE ]

She wisely moved off it, at least.

[/ QUOTE ]

She was much better in the Q&A..Loved the re-directs to the DOJ only wished they would've/could've pressed her more specically on the Wire Act..

[/ QUOTE ]

I think Conyers indicated that he will do just that after the recess. I look forward to hearing more about the horse racing exemption/non-exemption (i.e., we, the DOJ, say we think it's illegal, but we've done nothing about for 30 years).

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

Can we sneak pokers UIGEA exemptino into a version of the war funding bill that won't get vetoed.

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

I have to leave, can someone post a link to the audio after it finishes, please!

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Annie Duke now talking about it and giving a bad example of technology.

[/ QUOTE ]

She wisely moved off it, at least.

[/ QUOTE ]

She was much better in the Q&A..Loved the re-directs to the DOJ only wished they would've/could've pressed her more specically on the Wire Act..

[/ QUOTE ]

I think Conyers indicated that he will do just that after the recess. I look forward to hearing more about the horse racing exemption/non-exemption (i.e., we, the DOJ, say we think it's illegal, but we've done nothing about for 30 years).

[/ QUOTE ]

Can we get Skall down there in time??? Would love to see him Q&A the DOJ lady...

Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread
 

I am sitting here at break of hearing, had to get here 2 hrs early to get good seat. Gallery is full. Think Annie was solid and that conyers will give her some good questions...Q&A should be solid for us. Thought it was very interesting when Lamar Smith, ranking R cmmtee member interupted annie to say ' I'm not questioning your skill at all.' when he was cutting he off on that james bond Q about inside str8 flush odds....


Bryan Spadaro
Membership Relations, Manager
Poker Players Alliance