Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Full Ring (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=539192)

arras 11-06-2007 11:56 AM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
piscogay plays wierd, like 15/5/1.5 i think. might lose.

Deruy is very straight forward. Got like 15k hands @ 12/7.5/4 does alot of weird bet sizing.

[/ QUOTE ]

How long has Deruy been shortstacking? It seems to be a recent switch.

Sandviper23 11-06-2007 12:06 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
piscogay plays wierd, like 15/5/1.5 i think. might lose.

Deruy is very straight forward. Got like 15k hands @ 12/7.5/4 does alot of weird bet sizing.

[/ QUOTE ]

pisco is a well known bot.

[/ QUOTE ]




How can a bot last long enough to be well known as a bot to begin with? [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

seki 11-06-2007 02:49 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
Same info on pisco, slight loser 15/5 after 1k-ish hands.

Deruy is like 10/9/5 in my DB, but not a meaningful sample (<200).

jnic00 I have at 22/22/5 and losing over a <500 sample. I don't think he has a call button. Only note on him "tard", which means he probably stacked me.

only notes I have on non-fish: "ABC" or "FPS". If I mention a note like the "tard" above, and you happen to read this, please don't take it personally. Most of the time it doesn't reference your overall game, just the hand you stacked me on. "Tool" tends to mean the opposite: I stacked you, and you whined.

edit: all stats/samples are from my Q4 db (started october 1), as I'm not at my machine with my full-year db.

Chargers In 07 11-06-2007 02:52 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
piscogay plays wierd, like 15/5/1.5 i think. might lose.

Deruy is very straight forward. Got like 15k hands @ 12/7.5/4 does alot of weird bet sizing.

[/ QUOTE ]

How long has Deruy been shortstacking? It seems to be a recent switch.

[/ QUOTE ]Deruy and Svensk have been buying in for $30 since the table increase.

random50 11-06-2007 03:01 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm finding it quite the grind, although maybe just getting used to 12 tabling.

What about 25NL tables, for those that play there. Do you find that the regulars are more spread out?

[/ QUOTE ]

There's rarely more than 2 names I recognize easily at the table, although admittedly I'm not particularly observant.

My database in which I've played 40K hands has only 3 players with 1K+ hands logged and 25 with 500+ hands. So seems very spread out to me.

Chargers In 07 11-06-2007 03:09 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm finding it quite the grind, although maybe just getting used to 12 tabling.

What about 25NL tables, for those that play there. Do you find that the regulars are more spread out?

[/ QUOTE ] Regulars at the $25 are terrible. Alot of them play like 10/2 or 14/4. There have only been a couple I've been impressed with and they have both moved up and I still dabble in the $25 when I'm too tired to play the $50. Just steal relentlessly when you can at the $25 and isolate the fish when they limp. Also isolate the weak/tight set miners that limp when you have the button with nearly atc as long as the blinds are somewhat tight.

Chargers In 07 11-06-2007 03:12 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
I got piscogay at 13.5/5.35 after 2,002 hands and down $197.25.

Brimstead 11-06-2007 03:24 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
i have piscogay at 14/9/1.5 , down ~$45

Mike Kelley 11-06-2007 03:25 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
piscogay plays wierd, like 15/5/1.5 i think. might lose.

Deruy is very straight forward. Got like 15k hands @ 12/7.5/4 does alot of weird bet sizing.

[/ QUOTE ]

pisco is a well known bot.

[/ QUOTE ]




How can a bot last long enough to be well known as a bot to begin with? [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I've chatted with Pisco before. He's not a bot all the time if he is one.

swainy 11-06-2007 03:27 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
any1 got a lot of hands on me and feel like outing me as a useless player at nl50?

sn = swainy83

skydancing8 11-06-2007 03:29 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
What is improved about this thread this time?

Brimstead 11-06-2007 03:31 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
its new

Paul Levy 11-06-2007 04:43 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
thoughts on NL200 players:

capaneo,
jahwe,
lordyefc,

[/ QUOTE ]

Capaneo and jahwe are solid tags, I have them both around 17/11. Jury's still out on Lordyefc, I've seen him make some weird plays postflop.

baseball01 11-06-2007 05:19 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
I just moved up to NL50. Thoughts on some of the regulars:

jhart1358
Jonny_Moxon
pdk01
KillingAce
KiWiKaKi
AlexanderT
KingzRGut

QTip 11-06-2007 05:28 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thoughts on:

Marccus85
Fumbo420
Kelistaan(this guy is always discussed)
lifegoeson
Tru_Dat
The_Minion

Those are ones that I see at the tables constantly.

[/ QUOTE ]

They're all blah and Fumbo is mega bizarre. I refer to these players as a whole as "oddity nits" cause thats the only general way to describe them.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm confused at why you think you're a poker god.

Vedast 11-06-2007 08:09 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
Anybody know what happened to

Dufman79
LaPoCaFlame
Pandochat

I used to play with them a bunch but haven't seen them around a whole lot lately. Did they move up or go busto?

[/ QUOTE ]

Dufman79 plays nl200$ now.

Brimstead 11-06-2007 08:16 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
I just moved up to NL50. Thoughts on some of the regulars:

jhart1358
Jonny_Moxon
pdk01
KillingAce
KiWiKaKi
AlexanderT
KingzRGut

[/ QUOTE ]

i've only got ~350 hands on KillingAce, running at 11/7/3. He's not ABC, i've seen him do a couple of tricky things before.

AlexanderT is laggy, 30/14/2.6. He gets tricky in the battle of the blinds, likes to make a move or two in those situations, in my experience anyway.

Brimstead 11-06-2007 08:17 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
any1 ever play with billmich or emmalogan at nl50? emmalogan must deposit hundreds of $$$ a week!!!

CalledDownLight 11-06-2007 08:24 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
Thoughts on blunty31 at NL200 on Stars? Plays a lot of hands and probably winning at like 6+ ptbb/100.

bottomset 11-06-2007 08:24 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thoughts on:

Marccus85
Fumbo420
Kelistaan(this guy is always discussed)
lifegoeson
Tru_Dat
The_Minion

Those are ones that I see at the tables constantly.

[/ QUOTE ]

They're all blah and Fumbo is mega bizarre. I refer to these players as a whole as "oddity nits" cause thats the only general way to describe them.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm confused at why you think you're a poker god.

[/ QUOTE ]

he may not be a poker god but he may be the best 2/4 fr player

Vedast 11-06-2007 08:37 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
Thoughts on blunty31 at NL200 on Stars? Plays a lot of hands and probably winning at like 6+ ptbb/100.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

TheProdigy 11-06-2007 08:53 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thoughts on:

Marccus85
Fumbo420
Kelistaan(this guy is always discussed)
lifegoeson
Tru_Dat
The_Minion

Those are ones that I see at the tables constantly.

[/ QUOTE ]

They're all blah and Fumbo is mega bizarre. I refer to these players as a whole as "oddity nits" cause thats the only general way to describe them.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm confused at why you think you're a poker god.

[/ QUOTE ]

he may not be a poker god but he may be the best 2/4 fr player

[/ QUOTE ]

Correct. He is damn good is why he thinks he is a poker God. GM and Renton are also allowed to think they are poker Gods as well.

SomeoneElse 11-06-2007 09:03 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
Anybody know what happened to

Dufman79
LaPoCaFlame
Pandochat

I used to play with them a bunch but haven't seen them around a whole lot lately. Did they move up or go busto?

[/ QUOTE ]

Saw LaPoCaFlame at 100NL earlier today.

The Eureka Kid 11-06-2007 09:20 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
I've been planning a little 200NL lately and been running into the following players...

SobraoBoy
vjpconst1
treysfull21
Alphafoil
the_main
ryanmack91

Anyone got any thoughts on these players?

too eazy 11-06-2007 09:29 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thoughts on:

Marccus85
Fumbo420
Kelistaan(this guy is always discussed)
lifegoeson
Tru_Dat
The_Minion

Those are ones that I see at the tables constantly.

[/ QUOTE ]

They're all blah and Fumbo is mega bizarre. I refer to these players as a whole as "oddity nits" cause thats the only general way to describe them.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm confused at why you think you're a poker god.

[/ QUOTE ]


I don't think I'm a poker God so much as I think that everyone else overrates themselves and the people they play with. Basically the majority of regulars in any given level are bad up through 5/10 in my opinion. By bad I do not mean losing player, but marginal winner or worse.

To rephrase, I don't think I'm that good, I just think poker is easy because everyone else is bad. People simply don't practice poker as much as they do chess, baseball etc. and thus it's easy to be far ahead in the learning curve in this game, or far behind. Also there are plenty of regulars on extended heaters who play short bi rules and are susceptible to tilt meltdowns etc. (Which makes it easier for the bad nits to prosper)

too eazy 11-06-2007 09:30 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
and by prosper i mean win 1-2ptbb long term.

BBQSquirrel 11-06-2007 09:42 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
xaponet is tight-passive and runs 10/4. Just don't give him much action
Pipedream runs 7/5 in my databse. He won't donate to you but won't harm you either.
tesorillo is very passive (12/2). I once fold KK PF against his raise and sure enough he showed down AA

What do you think about these NL100 players

JP917
Tixmaster
NADA112
UPay4college
freepokerhand
virulin
im8yearsold
Alpha 5.20
McFiddish
Prairie Hawk
BBQsquirrel (me)

1p0kerboy 11-06-2007 09:44 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thoughts on:

Marccus85
Fumbo420
Kelistaan(this guy is always discussed)
lifegoeson
Tru_Dat
The_Minion

Those are ones that I see at the tables constantly.

[/ QUOTE ]

They're all blah and Fumbo is mega bizarre. I refer to these players as a whole as "oddity nits" cause thats the only general way to describe them.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm confused at why you think you're a poker god.

[/ QUOTE ]


I don't think I'm a poker God so much as I think that everyone else overrates themselves and the people they play with. Basically the majority of regulars in any given level are bad up through 5/10 in my opinion. By bad I do not mean losing player, but marginal winner or worse.

To rephrase, I don't think I'm that good, I just think poker is easy because everyone else is bad. People simply don't practice poker as much as they do chess, baseball etc. and thus it's easy to be far ahead in the learning curve in this game, or far behind. Also there are plenty of regulars on extended heaters who play short bi rules and are susceptible to tilt meltdowns etc. (Which makes it easier for the bad nits to prosper)

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh.

I think we're comparing a players' skills to the competition he plays against and nothing more.

We do this so that we can have a better feel for what the player is trying to do and so we can table select better.

Of course there's hardly any great players playing small/micro stakes.

Comparing players in a vacuum wouldn't really be helpful anyways.

too eazy 11-06-2007 09:46 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
yeah, you're probably correct 1p.

PrimogenitoX 11-06-2007 09:52 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
Kelisitaan is ridiculously bad. Does he actually beat these games? If so, WTF? Also, what do you think of PrimogenitoX? I play FR 600NL-2000NL when I am running bad at 6max or when I am stressed out and feel like chilling in a stress free 3bet/4bet free environment!

coordi 11-06-2007 10:19 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
online personas are fun. Im sure too eazy is a much more down to earth dude in person or say an AIM convo.

At 50 there arn't very many good regulars, just a bunch of ABC nits and rake machines (yes rake machines @ 50nl) Sobrao girl told me she playes like 100k a week. Not sure I believe but she plays a sick load of .5-1 bb/100 poker.

Jnic and nessv are probly best non 2+2 guys that play that i've noticed. I play I dont really notice alot of hands though so im sure there are better i missed.

can i get some 50nl regs to pm screen names. I only know like half of you fools.

ncboiler 11-06-2007 11:06 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
And also, do you guys have mad notes on everyone? What type of stuff?

[/ QUOTE ]

FWIW I am horrible at taking notes. I tend to note what people
cod call and limp with. Do they fire on two streets after raising PF...nothing special

Abdullaev 11-06-2007 11:17 PM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
Who here plays at the 10NL tables?

Seems to be full of multitablers and shortstackers. With not many tables running.

I'm finding it quite the grind, although maybe just getting used to 12 tabling.

What about 25NL tables, for those that play there. Do you find that the regulars are more spread out?

[/ QUOTE ]

I haven't played in a long time, and I recently came back when I learned that you could play 24 tables at once. I tried it out on 10NL and ended up at pretty much all of the available tables. So not many full ring 10NL games. There are a few former 25NLers down there who seem to be doing well. The rest seem to be willing to commit their stack with TPTK. Some want to be aggressive but have no brakes, some are passive with top set. It's like the land of broken toys. I think you could do very well by just setmining and playing premium pairs. Isn't poker, but it worked for me in my 24-table experiment.

As for 25NL, it is much more spread out. Far more tables available.

[ QUOTE ]
I just moved up to NL50. Thoughts on some of the regulars:

jhart1358
Jonny_Moxon
pdk01
KillingAce
KiWiKaKi
AlexanderT
KingzRGut


[/ QUOTE ]

I'm surprised AlexanderT is playing at 50NL, although I see him there occasionally. I have him at 31/14/1.3 over 2141 hands at 25NL over the summer, where he was getting beaten up fairly badly and seemed tilty. His numbers at 50NL are just as loose but his raise % is lower, near 10%, and he loses at a slightly lower-rate ptbb/100-wise. He's the only non-winning 25NLer that I am familiar with who moved up to 50NL.

KillingAce I have winning at 11/5/1.4 over 2300 hands. About 80% of the time he is ABC throughout an entire session. Rarely steals. But the other 20% of the time he seems either angry or drunk and plays MUCH less predictably . . . and better.

I have KiwiKaki 14/5/1.2 over 640 hands. Not much to say about him except that he lost $45 over that period, although he seems decent for 50NL.

QTip 11-07-2007 12:00 AM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thoughts on:

Marccus85
Fumbo420
Kelistaan(this guy is always discussed)
lifegoeson
Tru_Dat
The_Minion

Those are ones that I see at the tables constantly.

[/ QUOTE ]

They're all blah and Fumbo is mega bizarre. I refer to these players as a whole as "oddity nits" cause thats the only general way to describe them.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm confused at why you think you're a poker god.

[/ QUOTE ]


I don't think I'm a poker God so much as I think that everyone else overrates themselves and the people they play with. Basically the majority of regulars in any given level are bad up through 5/10 in my opinion. By bad I do not mean losing player, but marginal winner or worse.

To rephrase, I don't think I'm that good, I just think poker is easy because everyone else is bad. People simply don't practice poker as much as they do chess, baseball etc. and thus it's easy to be far ahead in the learning curve in this game, or far behind. Also there are plenty of regulars on extended heaters who play short bi rules and are susceptible to tilt meltdowns etc. (Which makes it easier for the bad nits to prosper)

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess I'll just throw my thoughts out here just in case there is some value in doing so.

I find players like tru_dat, the minion and so forth to be very good regs. I don't think there's many people out there that should be wanting them in their game. For someone to say their "meh" is a pretty ridiculous statement imo. In response to that I would have one question. What makes you (too easy in this case) not "meh" to be calling them meh. What do you think you're seeing in their play where you've got the edge on them. Personally, I think it's an imagined edge. And even if it's an edge, it certainly couldn't be large. If it is, then I'm drastically underestimating this game compared to limit. I find it humorous when people talk about being excited to have known tight players at their tables. You're just not going to be winning much money from them imo.

I don't think I'm that good at this game either (to which you've already agreed in other posts); however, I have over 250K+ hands at 4 ptbb/100 (can't be classified as an extended heater) and I'm quite certain you'd classify me as a bad nit.

To put it in a summary: I think many of you players overestimate yourselves, make judgements too quickly of other players based off of a very small sample of hands, overestimate your "perceived edge" against tight players, and are obnoxiously vocal about all of the above.

Hklm8383 11-07-2007 12:04 AM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
Agree pisco and deruy are str8forward and predictable, but that pretty much sums up NL50 grinders
Pisco is 15/5 in my DB too, don't think he's losing but he's not good

I like deruy but his play is nothing special. saw him playing 60bb tonight, must be running pretty bad

what about jnic00? he's one player who has actually been giving me some trouble lately. 2+2?

[/ QUOTE ]


jnic00 is steez4sheez

no wonder he is good (L)

Hklm8383 11-07-2007 12:09 AM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
Jnic and nessv are probly best non 2+2 guys that play that i've noticed. I play I dont really notice alot of hands though so im sure there are better i missed.

STEEZ4SHEEZ

Hklm8383 11-07-2007 12:12 AM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
tought on VLUFF at nl 200

FUTILEWAR

CalledDownLight 11-07-2007 12:27 AM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
tought on VLUFF at nl 200

FUTILEWAR

[/ QUOTE ]

vluff is only topped by jefflauzon and the incomparable dilith

Hklm8383 11-07-2007 12:32 AM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
tought on VLUFF at nl 200

FUTILEWAR

[/ QUOTE ]

vluff is only topped by jefflauzon and the incomparable dilith

[/ QUOTE ]

dilith is like 10/7/1

chip-star 11-07-2007 12:35 AM

Re: ** New & Improved ** Pokerstars Regulars Thread
 
[ QUOTE ]
Sobrao girl told me she playes like 100k a week. Not sure I believe but she plays a sick load of .5-1 bb/100 poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've played against sobraogirl at $5nl only a few weeks ago.

Have her as 12/4/3 over 1555 hands running at -0.01ptbb/100 and down 2 cents.

She has a pretty high af of 11.5 on the river too.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.