Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

The "Fold to river bet optimal value at 2/4-5/10" post inspired me to bump this.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

My post includes a link to this post and please read the post again.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

[ QUOTE ]
My post includes a link to this post and please read the post again.

[/ QUOTE ]

You misunderstood me. I know what your post contained. If this bump had been a reply to your post, it would have been done via the "reply" button within your post.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

OK [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

why was the title of this post changed? I liked 'I hate you tiger woods' so much better [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

[ QUOTE ]
why was the title of this post changed? I liked 'I hate you tiger woods' so much better [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Because we stickied it and if the title is more indicative of the contents than we'll get more people looking at it first before making dumb stats posts. Then we were told that we can't sticky it.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
why was the title of this post changed? I liked 'I hate you tiger woods' so much better [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Because we stickied it and if the title is more indicative of the contents than we'll get more people looking at it first before making dumb stats posts. Then we were told that we can't sticky it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you sticky a seperate post with a link to it (like the digest)?

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

The big problem I have with these stats are that they are from average winners. 1.5BB/100 is nice but it's like seeing a .280 baseball player and saying I want to be just like him!

Don't get me wrong - it's interesting and I appreciate all the work but 1.5BB/100 is a tad low to be looking at stats.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
why was the title of this post changed? I liked 'I hate you tiger woods' so much better [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Because we stickied it and if the title is more indicative of the contents than we'll get more people looking at it first before making dumb stats posts. Then we were told that we can't sticky it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you sticky a seperate post with a link to it (like the digest)?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Apparently the problem is that we're not allowed to have more than two stickies. We're working on writing a new sticky to replace the current posting guidelines etc.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

"compiled" would likely work better in the title

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

This is exactly what I was about to request, awesome.

Something like the micro guidelines would be terrific.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

[ QUOTE ]
This is exactly what I was about to request, awesome.

Something like the micro guidelines would be terrific.

[/ QUOTE ]

I always wondered why we never had this.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

I am a $1 / $2 $2 / $4 player on pacific and have been somewhat profitable over 2000 hands. Been using the tracker under a month since I decided to really try and will give you my info if you want it... I can be reached udner aim on the same screen name projectuber or through the boards here. Just be sure to let me know what exaclty you want

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

where would i find these stats in my pt?


Loss from BB:

Mean: 0.18
Standard Deviation: 0.05
Min: 0.08
Max: 0.28
A one-half standard deviation range about the mean: 0.15-0.20


Loss from SB:

Mean: 0.11
Standard Deviation: 0.05
Min: 0.02
Max: 0.21
A one-half standard deviation range about the mean: 0.09-0.14

Re: Compiled Small Stakes stats
 

where would i find these stats in my pt?

Loss from BB:

Mean: 0.18
Standard Deviation: 0.05
Min: 0.08
Max: 0.28
A one-half standard deviation range about the mean: 0.15-0.20


Loss from SB:

Mean: 0.11
Standard Deviation: 0.05
Min: 0.02
Max: 0.21
A one-half standard deviation range about the mean: 0.09-0.14

Re: Compiled Small Stakes stats
 

These stats are only for full ring (10 handed) play? Not all hands you play are with 10 players on it. I play short handed and some HU mostly, but even someone who always plays full ring, many of their hands will be 8 handed or even 7 handed. And then a winning players' stats will be different. For example in HU you should have like a 45 - 70% VP$IP and 40 - 60% PFR, depending on your opponent

Re: Compiled Small Stakes stats
 

and your point is?

This is a terrific post and excellent work. The stats are for full 10 handed tables. If you want HU stats, it's not the post for you.

Re: Compiled Small Stakes stats
 

[ QUOTE ]
a) Anything that seems like a typeo?

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh, yeah -- the word "typeo". It's typo. See typo @ dictionary.reference.com

Re: Compiled Small Stakes stats
 

[ QUOTE ]
These stats are only for full ring (10 handed) play? Not all hands you play are with 10 players on it. I play short handed and some HU mostly, but even someone who always plays full ring, many of their hands will be 8 handed or even 7 handed. And then a winning players' stats will be different. For example in HU you should have like a 45 - 70% VP$IP and 40 - 60% PFR, depending on your opponent

[/ QUOTE ]

That's why this wasn't posted in the Shorthanded forum.

Re: Compiled Small Stakes stats
 

where is the attachment?? i cannot find it...

Re: Compiled Small Stakes stats
 

It's CMI's second post in this thread. It starts with:

"Introduction:

The intent of this post is NOT to have players change their game in an effort to make their stats look more like those presented ..."

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

It would be interesting to see the stats for winning (>= 1 BB/100, which is about .5 BB/hr), "breakeven" (-1 BB/100 < win rate < 1 BB/100), and losing (< -1 BB/100) players, to see if there is a difference in any of the stats.

This would shed some light on the importance of strategy/style vs. reads.

Re: Compiled Small Stakes stats
 

I just like that you used S plus to run your data analysis. That takes heart.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

How do these results correlate with BB/100? I am running about at 24% VPIP with 1.2 BB/100 for 20,000 hands (about 5% over these results for each position). I clearly need to be more selective on the hands I am playing, but I am having trouble determining which hands not to play.

Do you have any suggestions?

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

[ QUOTE ]
How do these results correlate with BB/100? I am running about at 24% VPIP with 1.2 BB/100 for 20,000 hands (about 5% over these results for each position). I clearly need to be more selective on the hands I am playing, but I am having trouble determining which hands not to play.

Do you have any suggestions?

[/ QUOTE ]

Play by a starting hand chart? Fold more?

Actually the best answer to your question, which is basically "how should i play poker", is to use the search function for more than just bringing up old stat posts.

Re: I hate you tiger woods.... AKA: Stats post
 

Im really surprised with a few of the figures - in particular, attempts to steal blinds and how low it is for everyone.

Mine is WAY off the charts at 45%.

(im at about 2.9BB/100 after 85k hands of full ring)

Compiled stats
 

I searched but can't find anything like this for short handed, does anyone know if it exists on the forum

Re: Compiled stats
 

I replied to sparky via PM, but he might need a hand from someone on here, so Ill post.

Does anyone know if/where Krishan's post similar to this, but for shorthanded play, is?

Re: Compiled stats
 

Updates?