Re: nl 100, I played my AA extremely passive. line check.
 

i think you should bet somewhere.

Re: nl 100, I played my AA extremely passive. line check.
 

I think when checked to on the flop with a strong straight and flush draws on board a cont. bet is standard most of the time. It's ok to check that flop for deception but you lose most the value you could get from a hand that could call thinking there ahead. If checked for deception on flop then you failed to capitalize by betting turn or river based on the deception. There's just too many ways he can catch up to you and you pay them off based on your passive play.

Re: nl 100, I played my AA extremely passive. line check.
 

What's calling your river shove on that board that you beat?

[ QUOTE ]
Bet this flop 100% and push turn, or check turn and push river if he checked behind the turn

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: nl 100, I played my AA extremely passive. line check.
 

[ QUOTE ]
Bet flop.

Since you didn't, bet turn.

Since you didn't, bet river.

Since you didn't, maybe get a coach.

[/ QUOTE ]I lol'd

Re: nl 100, I played my AA extremely passive. line check.
 

[ QUOTE ]
Bet this flop 100% and push turn, or check turn and push river if he checked behind the turn

[/ QUOTE ]

Villain is the SB, so he isn't likely to check behind on the turn.

Re: nl 100, I played my AA extremely passive. line check.
 

[ QUOTE ]
Bet flop.

Since you didn't, bet turn.

Since you didn't, bet river.

Since you didn't, maybe get a coach.

[/ QUOTE ]
True.

Re: nl 100, I played my AA extremely passive. line check.
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what do you guys think SB's range for coldcalling a UTG+1 3bet is?

[/ QUOTE ]

See lots of TAGFish do this with 22+/AK.

At night when they go to sleep, they count implied odds instead of sheep.

[/ QUOTE ]

lolol