Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
5ptbb/100 for 30k hands can easily be variance

also, higher rake at nl25

[/ QUOTE ]

I do agree, however I think 30k hands is enough to know if I'm atleast a winner / loser at that level wouldn't you think? Even if my WR goes up or down slightly

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow!

Move down immediately.

[/ QUOTE ]


I'm assuming you're indicating that 30k hands is a worthless sample. Which I can't defend against [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
 

Didn't read thread, but obvious answer based on title is "play NL 100".

Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
 

[ QUOTE ]
Started at NL25 with $1000 and am down about 16BI over 5k hands. I'm not sure how I was beating NL100 pretty decently, btu am getting destroyed at NL25, my W$SD is 46% and W$SF is 43% (at NL25)

P.S. I don't have the $$ to just put up the money to start at NL100 again, I could play NL100 with 8BI but thats just suicide roll management.

[/ QUOTE ]

Also, if you started with $1000 and lost $400, how do you have $800 left?

<font color="white"> Lori </font>

Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
 

I posted this after a session, and somehow PT didn't catch 2 of my tables (I 4table but leave tables if they break / not enough fish) so I was actually down much less, I actually have like $750-60 so I just said 8BI in terms of simplicity.

Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
5ptbb/100 for 30k hands can easily be variance

also, higher rake at nl25

[/ QUOTE ]

I do agree, however I think 30k hands is enough to know if I'm atleast a winner / loser at that level wouldn't you think? Even if my WR goes up or down slightly

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow!

Move down immediately.

[/ QUOTE ]

being a 5ptbb/100 winner over 30k hands is pretty indicative of a winner imo

Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
 

wow I think Im gonna move from 25NL to 100NL pretty soon...lol

If the lowest level at the site is 10NL dont be suprised 25NL is a big jump winning players dont stay at 10NL very long and then they all get caught up with winners of 10NL and marginal losers at higher levels that have moved down. 50NL is still probably better though.

Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
 

10NL &lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt; 25NL &lt;&lt;&lt; 50NL &lt; 100NL &lt;&lt;&lt; 200NL &lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt;&lt; 400NL

Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
 

nl25 isnt even poker

Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
5ptbb/100 for 30k hands can easily be variance

also, higher rake at nl25

[/ QUOTE ]

I do agree, however I think 30k hands is enough to know if I'm atleast a winner / loser at that level wouldn't you think? Even if my WR goes up or down slightly

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow!

Move down immediately.

[/ QUOTE ]

being a 5ptbb/100 winner over 30k hands is pretty indicative of a winner imo

[/ QUOTE ]

Levelling going on?

Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
 

[ QUOTE ]
nl25 isnt even poker

[/ QUOTE ]