Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   I thought we were being friendly (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=538806)

Cue-Ball 66 11-05-2007 10:45 AM

Re: I thought we were being friendly
 
[ QUOTE ]
It's a suited 2 gapper against a nit open. Where do you draw the line? Any suited cards? Any semi connected cards? Any 2 cards?

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you call QTs?

Shizzle12345 11-05-2007 10:45 AM

Re: I thought we were being friendly
 
jesus christ just call and be over with it. This hand is so standard. Also if you got history with the guy, and you havent been bullying his ass out of alot of pots and basicly outplay the guy. Then you did something wrong and you deserve to lose with AQ here.

TheLoon 11-05-2007 10:50 AM

Re: I thought we were being friendly
 
I think I fold to his huge shove in this tiny pot. You say he is a nit. If this wasn't my read I would call.

TheLoon

Nick Royale 11-05-2007 11:06 AM

Re: I thought we were being friendly
 
Fold. You need to be correct almost 50% and a nit pushes 250bb in a tiny pot. Wtf at calling. This is what he does with the nuts because the pot is small anyway and you're deep so he's hoping you'll make retarded call. We should also consider AQ is almost as many combos as all possible sets combined, and his line is more consisent with AQ than a set.

Shizzle12345 11-05-2007 11:11 AM

Re: I thought we were being friendly
 
[ QUOTE ]
Fold. You need to be correct almost 50% and a nit pushes 250bb in a tiny pot. Wtf at calling. This is what he does with the nuts because the pot is small anyway and you're deep so he's hoping you'll make retarded call. We should also consider AQ is almost as many combos as all possible sets combined, and his line is more consisent with AQ than a set.

[/ QUOTE ]
and your correct more then 50% here vs sets and AQ. Lets asume this is a misclick a small part too, and maybe KJo sometimes too if hes tilting from another table or something. Or it could even be a super retarded played AA so were getting good odds to call.

mWired 11-05-2007 11:18 AM

Re: I thought we were being friendly
 
LOL @ call.
i can't even count how much money I did from bad players who
call in such spots where I push like 200BB into small pot with nuts and they call with like 5th nuts or something.

Daddy Warbucks 11-05-2007 11:22 AM

Re: I thought we were being friendly
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's a suited 2 gapper against a nit open. Where do you draw the line? Any suited cards? Any semi connected cards? Any 2 cards?

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you call QTs?

[/ QUOTE ]

I probably 3 bet.

Shizzle12345 11-05-2007 11:23 AM

Re: I thought we were being friendly
 
[ QUOTE ]
LOL @ call.
i can't even count how much money I did from bad players who
call in such spots where I push like 200BB into small pot with nuts and they call with like 5th nuts or something.

[/ QUOTE ]
what has that got to do with anything here, we got the 2nd fking nuts. We either call or fold, its not really important ev whise since its so close.

sh58 11-05-2007 11:24 AM

Re: I thought we were being friendly
 
come on. you hit your hand and want to fold. you have the 2nd nuts. instacall

BobbyLight 11-05-2007 11:31 AM

Re: I thought we were being friendly
 
I folded. I just don't get why a nitty player would do this with KK or a set; that would just be suicide.

There is no chance he has AA here for somebody who mentioned it.

It's either a misclick or AQ IMO, and I'm not sure if you would misclick like this.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.