Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   High Stakes Limit (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400 (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=538578)

doublebluff 11-05-2007 09:50 AM

Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
 
sorry double post

sup_bro 11-05-2007 10:24 AM

Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
 
not at all trying to hijack this thread but some of you are referring to actnjunkie as "SHE"...who is she?? just curious....

WillyT 11-05-2007 10:35 AM

Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
 
"not at all trying to hijack this thread but some of you are referring to actnjunkie as "SHE"...who is she?? just curious.... "

Brandi?

DeathDonkey 11-05-2007 09:00 PM

Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
 
Since its common knowledge its Chantel.

-DeathDonkey

WillyT 11-05-2007 09:20 PM

Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
 
Oh, right. I couldn't remember which one.

Thanks,
Bill

Schneids 11-05-2007 11:31 PM

Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
not if she pays off with K high and that is the majority of her range...

[/ QUOTE ]

hmmm, i just stoved it. Still think you lose money on the bet, but it's closer than i'd originally thought. If she occasionally bluffs k-hi when checked to, then i guess betting is ok.

[/ QUOTE ]

Combo of:

1) Weight it more heavily towards K-high than ace high since most of the reasonably big aces she'll cap preflop against me.
2) Betting takes away me having to make a decision if I check and she bets. You can never be too certain if it's a 0% or 5% or 20% likelihood she'll bet a K-high on the river.

Enon 11-06-2007 06:52 AM

Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
 
[ QUOTE ]
Since its common knowledge its Chantel.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm under impression various people play on it these days.

Mig 11-06-2007 11:14 AM

Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
 
I thought PS had a policy against account sharing ? Didn't they ban some accounts for that reason ?

MicroBob 11-06-2007 04:05 PM

Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
 
not that I'm aware of.
Letting somebody else play on your account is evidently okay I think.
YOU have more than one account of your own is not allowed though.

I believe they have specifically said that they allow letting others play on your account because there really isn't anything they can do to prevent it.
My memory might be off about this one though.

SpaceAce 11-06-2007 05:38 PM

Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
 
[ QUOTE ]
not that I'm aware of.
Letting somebody else play on your account is evidently okay I think.
YOU have more than one account of your own is not allowed though.

I believe they have specifically said that they allow letting others play on your account because there really isn't anything they can do to prevent it.
My memory might be off about this one though.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I believe this was settled by the Great Monkey Email some time back. PokerStars indicated that they could not be held responsible for players letting loose-aggressive pet monkeys play on the players' accounts.

SpaceAce


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.