Re: 425 bb deep with AA
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
easy b/f $410

[/ QUOTE ]

edit: I'd also make it more pf being that A) we're oop and B) we're 425bb deep

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought of doing this, but I figured that would be obvious to a decent player if all the sudden by 3 bet was $60+ instead of $50. To me, it seemed like it would basically tell him I have a huge hand and he has very large implied odds to call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah making it bigger preflop works only up to a certain stack size. Once you get really deep by making it bigger preflop you are just making ur reverse implied odds bigger.

Tbh i think the best play preflop is to flat call unless villain is a huge retard that doesnt understand hand ranges

Re: 425 bb deep with AA
 

or u could fake reraise to 500.

Re: 425 bb deep with AA
 

b/f was the first thing to come to mind
i suppose c/c isn't bad if you expect him to bluff a missed flush draw. i just cannot imagine KQ or AQ betting this river if checked to

Re: 425 bb deep with AA
 

[ QUOTE ]
you should also consider 1/2 pot / call.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] against a guy i don't have history against there's no way I beat anything that raises a bet on the river

Re: 425 bb deep with AA
 

I'm really unsure what you're expecting from this post. Obviously most people are going to say b/f.

What stands out the most to me is that you're 4+ buyins deep yet you are unable to provide any info on the guy. This is probably because you're multra-tabling (with or without hud); but if you're posting hands in MSNL and are trying to get better, then I just don't get that.

Re: 425 bb deep with AA
 

[ QUOTE ]
hmm, surprised no one has said c/c yet. It would def depend on villiain, like if he was way passive then i would bet/fold, but i think vs a decently aggro player I would c/c

[/ QUOTE ]

el

Re: 425 bb deep with AA
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you should also consider 1/2 pot / call.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] against a guy i don't have history against there's no way I beat anything that raises a bet on the river

[/ QUOTE ]


I strongly disagree with this. Even against unknown if I were to lead for 1/2 pot I would def be calling a 3x/4x raise.

Re: 425 bb deep with AA
 

without reads anything besides betting is pretty awful, imo. this is why you like playing [censored] players deep.

he is checking behind a lot hands. you get to value bet him to death. he doesn't bluff, ever, if you bet. he rarely bluffs if you check. he rarely bets for value with a hand you beat if you check.

players at this level suck at playing deep, big pots so you should take advantage of this by extracting max value in these situations.

Re: 425 bb deep with AA
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you should also consider 1/2 pot / call.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] against a guy i don't have history against there's no way I beat anything that raises a bet on the river

[/ QUOTE ]


I strongly disagree with this. Even against unknown if I were to lead for 1/2 pot I would def be calling a 3x/4x raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

never, ever, ever.

Re: 425 bb deep with AA
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
hmm, surprised no one has said c/c yet. It would def depend on villiain, like if he was way passive then i would bet/fold, but i think vs a decently aggro player I would c/c

[/ QUOTE ]

el

[/ QUOTE ]

oops sorry