Re: w$sd is a worthless stat (semi-brag)
 

[ QUOTE ]
my stats are 53.3 w$sd, 6.14 bb/100...60k hands

although imho i've run bad for long periods

am i to infer i don't look people up enough?

[/ QUOTE ]

The best way to figure this out would be to play your next 60k hands and everytime you don't want to look someone up, roll a ten-sided dice. If it says "1", then look them up when you would have folded.

Then for hands 120,001 to 180,000 look them up if the dice says either "1" and "2".

Und so weiter.

If Iggy is correct you will see a biphasic curve which will lead you to the optimal number for your type of play.

Re: w$sd is a worthless stat (semi-brag)
 

I [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Troll

Re: w$sd is a worthless stat (semi-brag)
 

You could do the same thing when contemplating whether to bluff right?

Re: w$sd is a worthless stat (semi-brag)
 

[ QUOTE ]
You could do the same thing when contemplating whether to bluff right?

[/ QUOTE ]

for 90% of players, just bluffing every time they think it's a borderline decision would probably improve their game.

Re: w$sd is a worthless stat (semi-brag)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
my stats are 53.3 w$sd, 6.14 bb/100...60k hands

although imho i've run bad for long periods

am i to infer i don't look people up enough?

[/ QUOTE ]

The best way to figure this out would be to play your next 60k hands and everytime you don't want to look someone up, roll a ten-sided dice. If it says "1", then look them up when you would have folded.

Then for hands 120,001 to 180,000 look them up if the dice says either "1" and "2".

Und so weiter.

If Iggy is correct you will see a biphasic curve which will lead you to the optimal number for your type of play.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, that's just stupid. I'll let others elaborate as to why.

Re: w$sd is a worthless stat (semi-brag)
 

Coz biphasic isn't a word?

Re: w$sd is a worthless stat (semi-brag)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Coz biphasic isn't a word?

[/ QUOTE ]Yes it is. (It's an adjective).

Buzz