Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=56)
-   -   Beat: You're Grimstarr (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=530641)

Homo Simpson 10-25-2007 12:00 AM

Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
 
the dealer bobvigously

Mike Kelley 10-25-2007 12:43 AM

Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Youre being pretty short sighted if you think this site is a good thing.

[/ QUOTE ]
It's great for me. I don't know why you think it's so bad. Maybe it would be better if they didn't post a biggest losers list, but that's a small price to pay for such a fun database to use to call 2+2 exaggerators and wannabes out.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're a [censored] idiot.

[/ QUOTE ]

ImsaKidd 10-25-2007 01:17 AM

Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
 
I couldnt search for myself at all

gordo16 10-25-2007 01:38 AM

Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
 
thats pretty damn inaccurate and terrible for online poker; hope stars puts a ban to it very soon.

Nick Rivers 10-25-2007 02:30 AM

Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
 
[ QUOTE ]
without accusing anybody of anything, this looks suspiciously like spam, so plz to be confirming that it's not

[/ QUOTE ]
Spam would be me advertising porn or Nokia phones, not me putting up a link of geniune interest to the poker-playing 2+2 community. A link to a site I'm not even affiliated with. Jesus Christ.

To all the nay-sayers, I hear you. I'm willing to give it a chance and see where it goes, though. It's stats are wrong for me, but only by way of admission of hands. It appears to have recorded about 70% of the hands I've played since its inception. But, it appears to be less than a month old, so some bugs are to be expected.

[Phill] 10-25-2007 02:56 AM

Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
 
The problem is not the accuracy of the site. It could be 100% accurate for all i care.

Nick Rivers 10-25-2007 03:30 AM

Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
 
[ QUOTE ]
The problem is not the accuracy of the site. It could be 100% accurate for all i care.

[/ QUOTE ]
Is your problem with the site that the sky is falling?

RunDownHouse 10-25-2007 03:35 AM

Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
 
If OP can't understand why he'd be accused of spamming, it's a [censored] far reach to hope he can understand why a site like this would be against TOS.

JReezy 10-25-2007 03:36 AM

Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
 
My stats look very accurate, actually. I don't understand what peoples' problem with this site is, when others publicly talk about datamining and some even advertise their databases for sale.

Daliman 10-25-2007 03:39 AM

Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
 
Hmm, it's off like 30k on mine....I'm gonna go with unreliable.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.