Re: Hand Against Rugby: 100/200. I\'m not telling you what I have yet
 

[ QUOTE ]

i think i would call with QJ min.
but i think he (aba)has a flush here a pretty decent %.

[/ QUOTE ]

agree every single word

Re: Hand Against Rugby: 100/200. I\'m not telling you what I have yet
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
LOL
Now THIS is a retarded post.First for playing Brian HU(nice game selection),and then for asking a ridiculous question that I dont know who can answer CORRECTLY!

[/ QUOTE ]

are you really calling me retarded for playing HU when I'm not playing HU and for posting a hand that's tough instead of easy? i'm surprised you still post: you make yourself look like a moron all the time. you never get embarrassed thinking about all your past posts?

[/ QUOTE ]

If you read my 2nd post above...it will make sense FWF

If not ..then I look foward to meeting you as you requested in the other thread, at the USPC M/E Tuesday.

If I dont make it I will most DEF. be at Foxwoods next month for the entire series to discuss those posts.

~stephen feraca [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

Re: Hand Against Rugby: 100/200. I\'m not telling you what I have yet
 

rbk's post is real good

Re: Hand Against Rugby: 100/200. I\'m not telling you what I have yet
 

pair of 8s

Re: Hand Against Rugby: 100/200. I\'m not telling you what I have yet
 

King high

Re: Hand Against Rugby: 100/200. I\'m not telling you what I have yet
 

The question you should ask is what hand should you call against Rugbeee's check-raise so that Building Sweaters won't be disappointed.

Re: Hand Against Rugby: 100/200. I\'m not telling you what I have yet
 

Some people have to realize that srubgy can't see our cards most of the time.. I think he has a flush a lot, and the A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] like 90% of the time he decides to bluff. I'd call with QJ, and somewhere between 0 and 50% with a J.

Re: Hand Against Rugby: 100/200. I\'m not telling you what I have yet
 

It seems like OP would check behind lots of draws on the turn, along with weakish made hands, maybe as strong as AK-AT, or something like J9, 96, etc..... just about all of these hands got there on the river in one way or another. So in aba's mind it's extremely likely that this river bet is one of three things:
- An attempt to squeeze out some thin value with a 6, AT, TT
- A strong v-bet with J or flush
- Total bluff

I suppose he thinks that you have to fold anything short of a flush because his line looks alot like a deceptively played flush draw. As we know brian loves stealing pots so this seems like a really good spot to represent a flush when he knows that your range is so balanced against you having one. I think you call with your entire river value betting range.

Re: Hand Against Rugby: 100/200. I\'m not telling you what I have yet
 

[ QUOTE ]
i think you guys are interpreting the turn action wrong.
i think the fact that FWF chks behind on turn makes his hand stronger.
if he had air i think he fires again, given his turn check i would give his range to be either a big ace playing pot control or some kind of decent draw like QJdd etc...therefore i really dont think its a good spot for aba to CR bluff.

i think i would call with QJ min.
but i think he (aba)has a flush here a pretty decent %.

[/ QUOTE ]

ding ding ding

Re: Hand Against Rugby: 100/200. I\'m not telling you what I have yet
 

I suspect brian's likely to pull this c/r with a wide range, because we will presumably bet the river a ton ourselves, both for thin value and as a bluff. But it's a pretty big c/r (way bigger than he needs to get you off of a bluff), so I expect his hand to be stronger. I'm hesitant to call with much weaker than QJ.

I also think a bluffshove would be sick, but i'm not sure if he'd fold QJ or small flush or not. Probably not if you've been getting out of line at all.