Re: The Official \"Tom Brady re-writes the record books in 2007\" Thread
 

epipen:

you don't happen to be from boston, do you?

it sucks that the pats d is so good too - would be nice to see brady eat it again this year

Re: The Official \"Tom Brady re-writes the record books in 2007\" Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
epipen:

you don't happen to be from boston, do you?

it sucks that the pats d is so good too - would be nice to see brady eat it again this year

[/ QUOTE ]

You don't happen to be from NY and a Boston hater do you?

PS: How are the Jets, Giants, Bills or whichever of the many NY teams you root for doing?

Re: The Official \"Tom Brady re-writes the record books in 2007\" Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
Vince Young >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>>>> Kurt Warner>>>>Brady>>>>>&gt ;>>>>>>>>>>>>M anning

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: The Official \"Tom Brady re-writes the record books in 2007\" Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
False.

Brady > Manning >>>>> Warner

[/ QUOTE ]

lol. Show's how much you know.

QB ratings: Warner 150, Brady 141.8, Manning 104.9

Re: The Official \"Tom Brady re-writes the record books in 2007\" Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
also, this is why DVOA should never be the end all argument when looking at individual players. Tom Brady is the same guy as he was last year, when he was 6th in DVOA. now I'm sure his dvoa would be best in the league, by a good margin. the difference is the talent around him.

[/ QUOTE ]

Its even more deceptive when using it to judge running backs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep. And everyone who's ever written for Football Outsiders acknowledges that.

Re: The Official \"Tom Brady re-writes the record books in 2007\" Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
False.

Brady > Manning >>>>> Warner

[/ QUOTE ]

lol. Show's how much you know.

QB ratings: Warner 150, Brady 141.8, Manning 104.9

[/ QUOTE ]

Shows how much you know, you are basing your argument on a half of a game for Warner.

Re: The Official \"Tom Brady re-writes the record books in 2007\" Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
False.

Brady > Manning >>>>> Warner

[/ QUOTE ]

lol. Show's how much you know.

QB ratings: Warner 150, Brady 141.8, Manning 104.9

[/ QUOTE ]

Shows how much you know, you are basing your argument on a half of a game for Warner.

[/ QUOTE ]

Leveled hard.

Re: The Official \"Tom Brady re-writes the record books in 2007\" Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
Kurt Warner>>>>Brady>>>>>&gt ;>>>>>>>>>>>>M anning

[/ QUOTE ]

You really think so?

I mean, I can see Brady being way ahead of Manning, but Warner is a bit old now and I don't know if he can be what he was.

/retard boston people

Re: The Official \"Tom Brady re-writes the record books in 2007\" Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
False.

Brady > Manning >>>>> Warner

[/ QUOTE ]

lol. Show's how much you know.

QB ratings: Warner 150, Brady 141.8, Manning 104.9

[/ QUOTE ]

Shows how much you know, you are basing your argument on a half of a game for Warner.

[/ QUOTE ]

Leveled hard.

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't tell what's a level and what isn't with all the stupidity in this thread. My bad.

Re: The Official \"Tom Brady re-writes the record books in 2007\" Thread
 

[ QUOTE ]
he's off to an incredible start, but the odds that is goes as swimmingly in weeks 4-6 as 1-3 are pretty low.

he's only slightly ahead of where Manning was after 3 games in 2004:

9 TD's
1 INT
903 yards
rating of 120

and look at Peytons 4 game stretch in November 04:

19 td's
3 int
1035 yards
rating of 129

so it's not really unprecedented to have these kind of stats after 3 games. having them after 16 games would be.

[/ QUOTE ]

The thanksgiving game at Detroit was particularly nasty. Manning threw 6 TDs before Sorgi came in with a minute left in the 4th quarter.

Also, lets not forget that Manning only played only 3 snaps in the last game of the '04 season. He likely would have put up 3-4 more TDs had he played since Denver was his bitch.