Re: hand
pbob, this hand really isnt hard to play. you call the river. simple.
the hand is still interesting tho, bc im very curious what co had. |
Re: hand
I agree with Victor on everything especially that only a set of 9s makes sense.
-DeathDonkey |
Re: hand
I still don't see why QcJc is out of question...
PM me results please. |
Re: hand
[ QUOTE ]
I still don't see why QcJc is out of question... [/ QUOTE ] the flop action. there isn't much good that comes out of raising that hand on the flop unless SB is donking non-showdownable hands really. i still agree that he will show up with this and other flush draws quite a bit though. |
Re: hand
|
Re: hand
[ QUOTE ]
I agree with Victor on everything especially that only a set of 9s makes sense. -DeathDonkey [/ QUOTE ] yeah that was also the hand (99) that came to mind at first about this hand. It's the only one that makes any overly good sense imo. |
Re: hand
I don't understand how people are so quick to dismiss the flush draw. Obviously there is a lot of sense to just calling the flop with the club draw. But an expert player would also know that he has a lot of equity with a flop raise (especially if he has a gutshot draw), and he gets two benefits from raising: (1) deception which may induce a bad play on a later street, (2) some information about hand strength which will help if he makes his flush on a paired board. It's also possible CO had a read that he could profitably try to push SB off his hand in certain spots.
The river play with a flush is unusual because a check/raise would seem natural, but he might have felt that either PB was likely to check behind this river as his turn cold-calls gave away his flush draw, or he might have felt PB might raise a set on the river if bet into. So I agree that there should be some discounting of the flush draw because of the way hand was played, but I would still make it the most likely hand. |
Re: hand
[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand how people are so quick to dismiss the flush draw [/ QUOTE ] I discount it because he had the chance to cap with it 3-ways on the flop and didn't. |
Re: hand
Wouldn't he 4-bet the turn with a set of 9s? Or, differently put, is it more likely he just called the 3-bet with a flush draw on the flop or just called the 3-bet with aset on the turn?
And, either way, do you think Bob is so clearly beat here that he should fold? |
Re: hand
[ QUOTE ]
Wouldn't he 4-bet the turn with a set of 9s? Or, differently put, is it more likely he just called the 3-bet with a flush draw on the flop or just called the 3-bet with aset on the turn? And, either way, do you think Bob is so clearly beat here that he should fold? [/ QUOTE ] I think Bob is ahead. The question is if he shoudl raise. I lean towards no, but not sure. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.