Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
LOL http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ain/index.html

King took Lynch #8 overall.

[/ QUOTE ]

Some of the other teams are just as bad. Sabino's receivers are Calvin johnson, devin hester, roscoe parrish, robert meachem. The structure is also retarded with any TD being 10 points. There is maybe 1 good team.

[/ QUOTE ]

??

Santana Moss not a WR? CJ and S.Moss is not bad for a 12 team league, especially when your QB is Bulger and you start 3 top 25ish rbs (Maroney, McGahee and Duece), have a decent RB backup (J.Jones) and a top 6 or so TE (V. Davis).

Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
 

McNabb at #72 below a guy who has never played a down in the NFL (Calvin #63), and also below three quarterbacks that he is unquestionably better than (Young #41, Rivers #38, Hasselbeck #20).

I mean, I know he said age matters, so that can help explain Rivers and Young. But Hasselbeck is older than McNabb.

Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
 

Champ Bailey at 6 and Nate Clements at 49? Hmm...

Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
LOL http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...ain/index.html

King took Lynch #8 overall.

[/ QUOTE ]


??

Santana Moss not a WR? CJ and S.Moss is not bad for a 12 team league, especially when your QB is Bulger and you start 3 top 25ish rbs (Maroney, McGahee and Duece), have a decent RB backup (J.Jones) and a top 6 or so TE (V. Davis).

[/ QUOTE ]

Didnt see santana, my bad. either way that league sucks.

Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
 

[ QUOTE ]
Champ Bailey at 6 and Nate Clements at 49? Hmm...

[/ QUOTE ]

He has Winfield (a bit overrated), Mathis (very good), Asomugha (very good), in between those two. I think Clements is slightly better. I think he has favored Seattle, San Diego and NE over some other teams. Those teams are very good but still they don't deserve that many players in the top 50 in the league.

I think Gore is underrated, #72 is way low. I guess injury concerns might leave you here, but he did lead the NFC in rushing last year. If he's going to put Kerrey Rhodes at #29 for being so young and so good I don't see how he ranks certain players.

As someone pointed out Matt H at #20 is pretty rediculous. Roy Williams (WR) is better than #90. Westbrook is better than #96. Pacman should be hire especially if Hester is that high. Eli is too high. I guess Roy Williams (SS) is right where he belongs, maybe too high. Lee Evans should be higher. Colston way too low. Bob Sanders is way too low 196. Mario Williams is way too low. I think Landry (Redskins) is too low. Then again I like Rookies.

Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Champ Bailey at 6 and Nate Clements at 49? Hmm...

[/ QUOTE ]

He has Winfield (a bit overrated), Mathis (very good), Asomugha (very good), in between those two. I think Clements is slightly better.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont think Winfield is the 2nd best CB (which by the way you typed your post It looks that way but I didnt double check the article). So maybe King has him overated but he has never made a probowl, so in general he is vastly underated.

Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
 

[ QUOTE ]

214. Michael Vick QB, Falcons
Real kick in the face to those other 276


[/ QUOTE ]

Vick should either be way higher or off the list completely, King provides no reasoning either.

It would be very difficult to rank 500 NFL players, but just compare where he has Hasselbeck to and where he has McNabb, what a joke.

Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

214. Michael Vick QB, Falcons
Real kick in the face to those other 276


[/ QUOTE ]

Vick should either be way higher or off the list completely, King provides no reasoning either.

[/ QUOTE ]

WTF? He should be off the list. Not because he is going to jail, but because he sucks at football.

Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
 

lolbad

Re: Peter King\'s top 500 NFL players
 

Aaron Kampman at 16.

wow...