Re: Sick slow call, slow roll story (very lightly embellished)
 

[ QUOTE ]
I personally would have seriously thought of killing him, or at least hope he has an fatal accident when he's driving home.

[/ QUOTE ]

There are people that I'd like to kill but despite my enthinicity I'm not good at it so I don't bother. And as mentioned in a follow on post written late last night it seemed to me this guy really didn't know any better.

My impression is that he was the type who got beat up a lot on the playground when he was a kid. Imagine a train wreck of a guy, sort of like George from Seinfeld but worse looking with rumpled clothes, very bad grooming and a tendency to sweat excessively. That was this guy. He seemed nice enough from our previous conversation and I really did think he would be strangled someday if he didn't at least stop this sort of thing.

I also had macro reasons to restrain myself. When people take five minutes with no action pending to show down the nuts cardroom management can use the slowness of the game to justify increases in rake for the no limit games. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

~ Rick

Re: Sick slow call, slow roll story (very lightly embellished)
 

Another great story from RN.

To bad you didn't river your FH and leave him with blueballs at showdown.

b

Re: Sick slow call, slow roll story (very lightly embellished)
 

wow that is so, so sick. What's even more amazing is he had the balls to do this to you while sitting RIGHT NEXT TO YOU. Wow.

Re: Sick slow call, slow roll story (very lightly embellished)
 

[ QUOTE ]
except it is a little shorter and less like sex since who can perform twice in five minutes (except of course woman and pubescent boys )

[/ QUOTE ]

Good writing but this line just creeped me out.

Re: Sick slow call, slow roll story (very lightly embellished)
 

Rick,

You should have murdered him on the spot. I'd aquit.
edit: failing that, I'm pretty sure 2p2 would help you post bail

Re: Sick slow call, slow roll story (very lightly embellished)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
except it is a little shorter and less like sex since who can perform twice in five minutes (except of course woman and pubescent boys )

[/ QUOTE ]

Good writing but this line just creeped me out.

[/ QUOTE ]

My bad. I really try to avoid being creepy.

Anyway by this I meant a woman can "perform" sex repeatedly with a willing partner and can be multi-orgasmic (or fake orgasms repeatedly; many, perhaps most guys couldn't tell the difference).

Perhaps I should have used the words "post pubescent teen"; I think many around the age of 15 could do the deed twice in five minutes if given the chance. I'm 53 so those days are long over (but at least I can last long). But then again the thought of spending that much time with me may be pretty creepy to some woman. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

~ Rick

Re: Sick slow call, slow roll story (very lightly embellished)
 

[ QUOTE ]

What would Brian Boitano do in this situation?

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Sick slow call, slow roll story (very lightly embellished)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
except it is a little shorter and less like sex since who can perform twice in five minutes (except of course woman and pubescent boys )

[/ QUOTE ]

Good writing but this line just creeped me out.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, he didn't mean sex WITH pubescent boys.. lol

Re: Sick slow call, slow roll story (very lightly embellished)
 

best self-control ever.

it sounds like the guy was such a loser . . . .

that pounding him into the floor would have
ascribed to him value that he did not have.

Re: Sick slow call, slow roll story (very lightly embellished)
 

[ QUOTE ]
(but at least I can last long).

[/ QUOTE ]Ahh, I was wondering where the "(very lightly embellished)" part kicked in. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Seriously, kudos on your reaction. I would have either said "nice slow roll" and seethed for the next hour or tried to strangle him. A middle ground wouldn't have occurred to me.