Re: Calls
 

[ QUOTE ]
problem is he could easily be bluffing with a better hand so i dont think this call is profitable in the long run

[/ QUOTE ]

not too many..

Re: Calls
 

this would be a funny followup to the bld-zeebo hand if he showed up with 33.

i click fold after he 3bets pre.

i agree with durrr river call > flop call

Re: Calls
 

[ QUOTE ]

results? rofl

[/ QUOTE ]

He had A8o so it's pretty obvious I had played him earlier with this account and not on my other account :P

Re: Calls
 

you beat 2 hands, and neither of them bet the river.

Re: Calls
 

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks for the good reply, do I really need 44%? Figured it would be around 30%.

[/ QUOTE ]

You gotta work on poker math for a bit. You need 33% equity when villain pots it, 25% when he bets half pot. How on earth do you think you need 30% equity when he makes such a big overbet ?
I would recommend learning pot odds.

Re: Calls
 

the call on the river wasnt the worst part of the play. if you thought he was bluffing from the start it would have been better to raise the flop or the turn. calling on the river isnt terrible if you seriously think hes bluffing but calling on the flop is horrendous when he could easily be on a draw air which you put him on. if you really thought he was bluffing you must raise the flop or at least the turn

Re: Calls
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So where did I go wrong?

[/ QUOTE ]

Table Lithium 6-max (Real Money)

[/ QUOTE ]
LOL